Definitions and Case Law Flashcards
Rape
Section 128(2) Crimes Act 1961
Person A rapes Person B if Person A has sexual connection with Person B, effected by the penetration of Person Bs genitalia by Person As penis -
- without Person Bs consent AND
- without believing on reasonable ground that person B consents to the connection
Penetration
Section 2(1A) Crimes Act 1961 Introduction and penetration have the same meaning.
Introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
Proof of Penetration is Required
Proof of penetration may be provided by:
- the complainants evidence
- medical examination (DNA, injuries)
- accused’s admissions
Genitalia
section 2 Crimes Act 1961
Genitalia includes any surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring male or female genitalia (whether the person concerned is male, female or of indeterminate sex)
R v Koroheke
The genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior… they include the vulva (and) the labia both internal and exterior at the opening of the vagina
Penis
Section 2 Crimes Act 1961
Penis includes any surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to a naturally occurring penis (whether the person concerned is male, female or of indeterminate sex)
Consent
“Consent” is a persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another
R v Cox
Consent must be…. full, voluntary, free and informed…. freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to make a rational judgement
Matters that do not constitute consent sec. 128(A)
- not protesting or offering resistance to the application of force
- the application of/ threat of/ fear of force to self or other
- asleep or unconscious
- so effected by drugs/alcohol they cannot consent
- so effected by physical or mental impairment they cannot consent
- mistaken ID
- mistaken as to the nature and quality of the act
Reasonable Grounds (3 tests)
Reasonable Grounds
The establishing of reasonable grounds is a three step process.
Subjective Test, Step 1: Absence of consent
- What was the complainant thinking at the time? i.e. was s/he consenting?
Subjective Test, Step 2: Belief in Consent
- Did the offender believe the complainant was consenting? i.e.: what was the offender thinking?
Objective Test, Step 3: Reasonable Grounds for belief of consent
- If the offender believed the complainant was consenting, was that belief on reasonable grounds? What would a reasonable person have believed if placed in the same position as the defendant?
R v Gutuama
Under the objective test the Crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accuseds shoes could have thought the complainant was consenting”
Unlawful sexual connection
Section 128(3) Crimes Act 1961
Person A has unlawful sexual connection with Person B if Person A has sexual connection with Person B: -
- without Person Bs consent to the connection AND
- without belief on reasonable ground that Person B consents to the connection
Sexual Connection
Section 2 Crimes Act 1961
a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of a person, other than for genuine medical purposes, of:
i) the part of the body of another person, OR
ii) an object held or manipulated by another person, OR
b) connection between the mouth and tongue of one person and a part of another persons genitalia or anus, OR
c) continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b)
Sexual Violation
Section 128(1) Crimes Act 1961
(1) Sexual Violation is the act of a person who:
a) rapes another person; or
b) has unlawful sexual connection with another person
section 131A(1)(c) Dependant family member
if she or she is living with the other person as a member of the other persons family, and the other person is not a person referred to in paragraph (a) but has:
i) power or authority over him or her; and
ii) a responsibility for, or significant role in his or her care or upbringing