Definitions and Case Law Flashcards

1
Q

Intent

A

Two specific types an intention to commit the act and secondly, an intention to get a specific result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assault

A

Means the act of intentionally applying force or attempting to apply force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Collister

A

Circumstantial evidence from which an offender’s intent may be inferred can include:

  • Offender’s actions and words before, during and after the event
  • The surrounding circumstances
  • The nature of the act itself
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Taisalika

A

Intent

The nature of the blow and the gash which it produced woud point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Grevious Bodily Harm

A

Harm that is really serious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

DPP v Smith

A

Bodily Harm needs no explanation and grevious means no more and no less than really serisous harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Waters

A

Wounds

A breaking of the skin evidenced by a flow of blood both internal and external.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Maiming

A

Mutilating, crippling or disabling a part of the body so as to deprive the victim of the use of a limb or of one of the senses … needs to be some degree of permanence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Disfigures

A

To deform or deface to or alter the figure or appearance of a person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Rapana and Murray

A

Disfigures.

The word ‘disfigure covers not only permanent damage but also temporary damage’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The Doctrine of Transferred Malice

A

Where the defendant mistakes the identity of the person injured where harm intended for one person is accidentally inflicted on another, he is still criminally responsible, under the Doctrine of Transferred Malice despite the wrong target being struck.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Injure

A

To injure means to cause actual bodily harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Recklessness

A

Acting “recklessly” involves conciously and deliberatley taking an unjustifiable risk.

It must be proved not only that the defendant was aware of the risk and proceeded regardless (a subjective test), but also it was unreasonable for him to do so (an objective test).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Camerson v R

A

Recklessness established if:

The Defendant recognised that there was a real possiblity that his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result and or that the proscribed circumstances existed.

Having regards to that risk those actions were unreasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Tihi

A

Aggravated Wounding

In addition to one of the specific intents outlined in paragraphs (a), (b) or (c ), it must be shown that the offender either meant to cause the specified harm, or foresaw that the actions undertaken by him were likely to expose others to the risk of suffering it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Wati

A

Aggravated Wounding

There must be proof of the commission or attempted commission of a crime either by the person committing the assault or by the person whose arrest or flight he intends to avoid or facilitate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Stupefies

A

Means to induce a state of stupor, to make stupid , groggy or insensible; to dull the senses or facuties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

R v Pekepo

A

Reckless Discharge

A reckless discharge of a firearm in the general direction of a passer-by who happens to be hit is not sufficient proof. An intention to shoot that person must be established.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Discharge

A

To fire or shoot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Firearm

A

Firearm acts by force or explosive, where an airgun act by force of compressed air or gas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Property

A

Property includes real and personal property, and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, money, electricity, and anything in action and any other right or interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

R v Mcarthur

A

Injures

Bodily Harm includes any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim. It need not be permanent but must be more than transitory and trifliing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

R v Swain

A

To deliberately or purposefully remove a sawn-off shotgun from a bag after being confronted by or called upon by a Police Constable amounts to a use of that firearm within the meaning of Section 198A Crimes Act 1961.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Constable

A

Holds the office of Constable and includes a Constable who holds any level of position within the New Zealand Police.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Simester and Brookbanks

A

Knowledge

Knowing means knowing and correctly believing the defendant may believe something wrongly but cannot know something that is false.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Fisher v R

A

It is necessary in the order to establish a charge under section 198A(2) for the Crown to prove that the accused knew someone was attempting to arrest or detain him because otherwise the element of mens rea of intending to resist lawful arrest or detention cannot be established.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Imprisonable Offence

A

Any offence which is punishable by a term of imprisonment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

R v Cox Possession

A

Possession

Involves two elements both physcial and mental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Robbery

A

Theft accompanied by violence or threats of violence, to any person or property, used to extort the property stolen or to prevent or overcome resistance to its being stolen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Theft

A

Dishonestly, and without claim of right takes any property with intent to deprive the owner permanently of that property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Dishonestly

A

Done or omitted without a belief that there was express or implied consent to, or authority for, the act or omission from a person entitled to such consent or authority.

32
Q

Claim of Right

A

Belief at the time of the act in proprietary or possessory right in property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed.

33
Q

R v Skivington

A

Claim of right is a defence to robbery.

34
Q

R v Lapier

A

Robbery is complete the instant the property is taken, even if possession by the theif is only momentary.

35
Q

R v Peat

A

The immediate return of the goods by the robber does not the purge the offence.

36
Q

R v Maihi

A

There must be a nexus between the act of stealing and a threat of violence. Do not need to be contemporaneous.

37
Q

Peneha v Police

A

Violence

The actions of the defendant must forcibly interere with personal freedom.

38
Q

R v Broughton

A

The threat may be direct or veiled. It may be conveyed by words or conduct, or a combination of both.

39
Q

R v Pacholko

A

The conduct of the accused must be assessed rather than the nerves of the victim.

40
Q

Extort

A

To obtain by coercion or intimidation

41
Q

Prevent

A

To keep from happening.

42
Q

Overcome

A

To defeat; to prevail over; to get the better of in a conflict.

43
Q

R v Wells

A

There is no requirement that the harm be inflicted on the victim of the robbery, thus infliction of harm to a person seeking to prevent the escape of the offender would come within the section.

44
Q

R v Joyce

A

Together with

At least two persons were physically present at the time the robbery was committed or the assault occurred.

45
Q

R v Galey

A

Together with

Two or more persons having the common intention to use their combined force.

46
Q

Being Armed With

A

Defendant is carrying the item or has it available for immediate use as a weapon.

47
Q

Offensive Weapon

A

Any article made or altered for use for the causing bodily injury, or intended by the person having it with him for such use.

48
Q

R v Bentham

A

Whats is possessed must be under the definition be a thing. A persons hand or fingers are not a thing.

49
Q

Being together with

A

Physcial Proximity and Joint Enterprise

50
Q

Blackmail

A

Threatens, communication of the threat or accusation or disclosure or threats to damage property or endanger person obtains benefit or pecuniary advantage or privlege or valuable consideration or property.

51
Q

What must be proven for Blackmail

A

Threatened expressly or by implication:

Make any accusation against any person or

dislcose something about any person or

endager the safety of any person

and that the suspect intended to:

Cause the person to whom the threat is made to act in accordance with the will of the person making the threat and

obtain any

Benefit or

to cause loss to any other person

52
Q

Demanding with intent to steal

A

Without claim of right, by force or with any threat, compels any person to execute, make accept, endorse, alter, or destroy any document capable of conferring a pecuniary advantage with intent to obtain any benefit.

53
Q

Unlawfully

A

Without lawful justification or excuse.

54
Q

R v Wellard

A

The essence of the offence of kidnapping is the deprivation of liberty coupled with a carrying away from the place where the victim wants to be.

55
Q

R v Crossan

A

Taking away and detaining are seperate and distinct offences.

56
Q

R v Pryce

A

Detaining is an active concept meaning to keep in confinement or custody.

57
Q

Consent

A

Consent is a person’s concious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another.

58
Q

R v Cox Consent

A

Consent must be full voluntary, free and informed … freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgment.

59
Q

R v Crossan (By any violent means)

A

Incapable of resisitance includes a powerlessness of the will as well as a physical capacity

60
Q

Section 209A, Crimes Act 1961

A

For the purposed of sections 208 and 209, a person under the age of 16 years cannot consent to being taken away or dtained.

61
Q

Consent obtained by fraud

A

deceive the victim into agreeing to a proposition by misrepresenting the facts or their intentions.

62
Q

Consent obtained by duress

A

Acquiesce to an offenders demands based on fear of the consequences if they refuse.

63
Q

R v Mohi

A

The offence is committed at the time of taking away, so long as there is, at that moment, the necessary intent.

64
Q

Section 210A, Crimes Act 1961

A

A person who claims in good faith a right to the possession of a young person under the age of 16 years cannot be convicted of an offence against section 209 or section 210 because he of she gets possession of the young person.

65
Q

Ransom

A

A ransom is a sum of money demanded or paid for the release of a person being held captive.

66
Q

Confine

A

Confining a person can include restricting their movements to within a geographical area, but also has wider meaning that includes curtailing their activity and exercising control and influence over them.

67
Q

Imprison

A

To imprison a person meansto put them in prison, or to confine them as if in prison.

68
Q

Section 210, Crimes Act 1961

A

It is immaterial whether the young person consents, or is taken or goes or is received at his or her own suggestion and it is immadterial whether the offender believes the young person to be of or over the ages of 16.

69
Q

R v Forrest and Forrest

A

The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of the victims age.

70
Q

R v Chartrand

A

Whether the defendant may have had an innocent motive, or intended to interfere with possession for a very short period of time is beside the point.

It is not necessary to prove the accused intended a permanent deprivation.

71
Q

Knowledge

A

The offender must know the young person they are receiving has been abducted.

72
Q

AP Simester and WJ Brookbanks

A

Knowing means knowing or correctly believing. the defendant may believe something wrongly, but cannot know something is false.

73
Q

R v Waaka

A

Intent may be formed at any time during the taking away. If a taking away commences without the intent to have intercourse, but that intent is formed during the taking away, then that is sufficient for the purposes of the section.

74
Q

R v M

A

The Crown must prove that the accused intended to take away or detain the complainant and that he or she knew that the complainant was not consenting.

75
Q

Migrant Smuggling

A

Involves a person who has freely consented to be brought into New Zealand as an illegal immigrant and is not subjected to coercion or deception.

76
Q

People Trafficking

A

Involves a person who is brought into New Zealand by means of coercion or deception.

77
Q

Investigation approaches to MS and PT

A

Reactive Investigation

Proactive Investigation

Disruptive Investigation