definitions Flashcards

1
Q

What is justiciability?

A

Justiciability refers to the types of matters that federal courts can resolve. If a case is ‘nonjusticiable,’ a federal court cannot hear it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is mootness?

A

Mootness arises when there is no longer an actual controversy between the parties, and any ruling by the court would have no practical impact.

Example: Marco Defunis’s challenge to an affirmative action program involving admission to law school was dismissed by the SCOTUS because he had already been admitted and would graduate regardless of the outcome of his case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is ripeness?

A

Ripeness refers to the readiness of a case for litigation. A case is nonjusticiable if the controversy is premature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are political questions?

A

A suit that involves what is deemed a political question will NOT be considered justiciable. This occurs when an issue is so politically charged that federal courts should not hear it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the two aspects in determining political questions?

A
  1. If the decision is committed to another branch of government - not the judiciary’s decision. 2. If there is no identifiable clear judicial standard that can be developed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is standing to sue?

A

To invoke the court’s jurisdiction, the plaintiff must demonstrate that: 1. A party must have suffered a concrete injury or be in imminent danger of suffering such a loss. 2. The injury must be ‘fairly traceable’ to the challenged action. 3. A favorable court decision is likely to provide redress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is original jurisdiction of the SCOTUS?

A

Article 3, Section 2 limits this to a small number of cases, including cases affecting ambassadors, public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state may be a party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is appellate jurisdiction of the SCOTUS?

A

Article 3, Section 2 states that in all other cases, the Supreme Court will have appellate jurisdiction, allowing it to review and change decisions of lower courts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are Article III courts?

A

Federal courts established by, or under Article 3 of the U.S. Constitution, including the Supreme Court, courts of appeals, district courts, and the Court of International Trade.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is federal jurisdiction?

A

Cases may be brought in federal courts when they involve the federal constitution, federal laws, federal officials, or federal rules or regulations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is diversity of citizenship jurisdiction?

A

Civil lawsuits may be brought in federal courts when all plaintiffs reside in one state, while all defendants reside in another state, or if a substantial amount of money is involved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is abstract judicial review?

A

Abstract judicial review occurs in the absence of an actual case or controversy and before a challenged law has taken effect.

Example: If the chamber of deputies passes a law, someone can file a petition claiming it violates the constitution, and the constitutional council can decide the abstract issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is concrete judicial review?

A

Concrete judicial review can only be exercised in concrete cases and only after the fact, requiring suits to be brought by parties with real interest in the outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the rule of four?

A

The rule of four is a practical decision-making rule used by the SCOTUS to determine whether to grant a writ of certiorari, permitting 4 of the 9 justices to grant it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is discretionary review?

A

Discretionary review gives authority to appellate courts to decide which appeals they will take out of the cases submitted to them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is original intent?

A

Original intent is the theory of interpretation by which judges ascertain the meaning of a constitutional provision by determining how it was understood at the time it was drafted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is original meaning or design?

A

Original meaning or design considers how certain words and phrases were interpreted and defined in 1781 when the document was written.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is evolutionary understanding?

A

Evolutionary understanding refers to the interpretation of constitutional provisions as they evolve over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is stare decisis?

A

Stare decisis, meaning ‘let the decision stand,’ looks to what courts have written about a clause, causing it to become a binding precedent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is settled law?

A

Settled law, or ‘black-letter law,’ refers to law that is so well-established that it is no longer subject to reasonable dispute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is selective incorporation?

A

Selective incorporation is a theory that rights guaranteed by the first 8 amendments to the U.S. Constitution are incorporated into the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is selective incorporation plus?

A

Selective incorporation plus refers to rights not limited to original provisions, including considerations from the 9th amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is the due process decade?

A

The due process decade refers to the 1960s, during which most decisions involving selective incorporation occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is total incorporation?

A

Total incorporation is the view that the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause embraces all guarantees in the Bill of Rights and applies them to state law cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
What are separationists?
Separationists are advocates of secession or separation from a larger group.
26
What is the Freedom from Religion Foundation?
The Freedom from Religion Foundation consists of extremist groups that are anti-religion and advocate for strict separation of church and state.
27
What are accommodationists?
Accommodationists seek compromise with opposing points of view, typically in a political context.
28
What is Justice Stone's footnote #4 in the Carolene Products Co. case?
Justice Stone's footnote #4 states that the court will protect fundamental freedoms, especially those in the First Amendment, and will protect discrete and insular minorities.
29
What is the RFRA?
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act prohibits the federal and state governments from substantially burdening a person's free exercise of religion without compelling justification. ## Footnote Case: Boerne v. Flores; Burwell v. Hobby Lobby.
30
What is RLUIPA?
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act is specifically defined to apply to zoning issues and the religious rights of prisoners.
31
What are closely-held corporations?
Closely-held corporations are non-profit corporations that encompass churches, and they may claim free exercise of religion.
32
What are public accommodations?
Public accommodations are private entities that own, operate, or lease places used by the public, such as restaurants, hotels, and theaters. ## Footnote Examples: Masterpiece Cakeshop; Heart of the Atlanta Motel.
33
Who was Roger Williams in the Rhode Island Colony?
Roger Williams was a proponent of separation of church and state, using the metaphor 'wall of separation between the garden of the church and the wilderness of the world.'
34
What is Thomas Jefferson's letter to the Baptists of Danbury, Connecticut?
In his letter, Jefferson interpreted the First Amendment as 'building a wall of separation between church and state.'
35
What did Justice Black say in Everson?
Justice Black stated that 'the wall must remain high and impregnable' between church and state.
36
What is Marbury v. Madison (1803)?
This case involved a conflict between Federalists and Anti-Federalists, establishing the power of judicial review. ## Footnote Outcome: Application for writ of mandamus denied; Marbury doesn't get the commission.
37
What is Ex Parte McCardle (1869)?
This case questioned whether Congress may withdraw jurisdiction from the Supreme Court after it has been granted. ## Footnote Outcome: Upheld Congress's power to limit appellate jurisdiction.
38
Who was John Bingham of Ohio?
John Bingham was a founding father of the 14th Amendment who advocated for total incorporation.
39
What is Barron v. Baltimore (1833)?
This case determined that the 5th Amendment does not apply to state and local governments, only to the federal government. ## Footnote Outcome: Unanimous decision.
40
What is Palko v. Connecticut (1937)?
This case established selective incorporation, ruling that the 5th Amendment's double jeopardy prohibition does not apply to the states. ## Footnote Outcome: Supreme Court upheld Palko's second conviction.
41
What is Duncan v. Louisiana (1968)?
This case questioned whether Louisiana was obligated to provide a trial by jury in criminal cases like Duncan's. ## Footnote Outcome: The court ruled that Duncan's rights were violated.
42
What was Gary Duncan found guilty of?
Assaulting a white kid by allegedly slapping him on the elbow.
43
What was Duncan's sentence?
60 days in prison and fined $150.
44
Was Duncan's request for a jury trial granted?
No, his request for a jury trial was denied.
45
Was the state of Louisiana obligated to provide a trial by jury in criminal cases like Duncan's?
Yes.
46
Were Duncan's 5th, 6th, & 14th amendment rights violated when he was denied a trial by jury?
Yes.
47
What was the outcome of the case regarding Duncan's rights?
7 to 2 in favor of Duncan; the court held that the 6th amendment was fundamental to justice and states must provide jury trials under the 14th amendment.
48
What was the significance of the Slaughterhouse Cases of 1873?
It was the first interpretation of the 14th amendment, resulting in the refusal to extend privileges & immunities.
49
What was the view of the Old-Order Amish regarding secondary education?
They believed it was not necessary.
50
Did Wisconsin's compulsory attendance law violate the First Amendment?
Yes.
51
What was the outcome of Wisconsin v. Yoder?
Unanimous decision in favor of the individual's exercise of religion.
52
What did Employment Division v. Smith (1990) address?
Whether a state can deny unemployment benefits to a worker fired for using illegal drugs for religious purposes.
53
What was the outcome of Employment Division v. Smith?
Yes, the court ruled that religious beliefs do not excuse compliance with valid laws.
54
What is the significance of laws of general applicability?
They prevent the use of strict scrutiny or violation of the First Amendment.
55
What was the outcome of Sherbert v. Verner (1933)?
7-2 decision that the free exercise clause prohibits government from imposing significant burdens on religious practices.
56
What did City of Boerne v. Flores (1997) involve?
The RFRA and whether Congress can override SCOTUS's interpretation of constitutional rights.
57
What was the outcome of City of Boerne v. Flores?
The court ruled that it was up to the courts to determine the proper test, not Congress.
58
What was the issue in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores (2014)?
Whether a for-profit company can deny health coverage for contraception based on religious objections.
59
What was the outcome of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores?
5-4 decision allowing the company to deny contraceptive coverage.
60
What did Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964) address?
Whether Title II of the Civil Rights Act exceeded Congress's commerce clause powers.
61
What was the outcome of Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States?
Unanimous decision that the government could enjoin the motel from racial discrimination.
62
What was the conflict in Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission?
A gay couple sued a cake maker for refusing to make a wedding cake.
63
What was the outcome of Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission?
7-2 decision for the cake shop; creating cakes was considered artistic expression.
64
What was the issue in Everson v. Board of Education (1947)?
Whether New Jersey's reimbursement for transportation to religious schools violated the establishment clause.
65
What was the outcome of Everson v. Board of Education?
5-4 decision that the law did not violate the constitution.
66
What is the child benefit theory established in Everson v. Board?
State funds can be given to students in private schools if justified as benefiting the child.
67
What did Lemon v. Kurtzman establish?
Whether state funding for non-public, non-secular schools violates the establishment clause.
68
What was the outcome of Lemon v. Kurtzman?
The court found excessive entanglement, violating the establishment clause.
69
What is the three-part test established in Lemon v. Kurtzman?
1. Is it secular? 2. Is it neutral? 3. Is there excessive entanglement?
70
What was the issue in Lee v. Weisman (1992)?
Whether a rabbi's prayer at a public school graduation was coercive.
71
What was the outcome of Lee v. Weisman?
It was held to be coercive.
72
What was the endorsement test established in Lynch v. Donnelly?
To avoid implications of the secular purpose test.
73
What was the outcome of U.S. v. Ballard?
You cannot be prosecuted for any religious belief.
74
What was the issue in Abington Township v. Schempp?
Whether mandatory Bible reading in public schools violated the First Amendment.
75
What was the outcome of Abington Township v. Schempp?
8-1 decision that it violated the First Amendment.
76
What was the outcome of Marsh v. Chambers?
6-3 decision allowing legislative prayer as part of societal fabric.
77
What was the outcome of Town of Greece v. Galloway?
Similar to Marsh; towns may allow volunteer chaplains to open meetings with prayer.
78
What was the outcome of Agostini v. Felton?
The government may pay for teaching secular subjects in religious institutions.
79
What was the outcome of Zelman v. Simmons-Harris?
States may provide vouchers for students to attend private religious schools.
80
What was the outcome of Edwards v. Aguillard?
Yes, it was a violation of the establishment clause.
81
What was the outcome of Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District?
Intelligent design was not considered science; it was religion disguised.
82
What was the outcome of Santa Fe ISD v. Doe?
Student-led prayers at football games were deemed coercive.
83
What was the outcome of Van Orden v. Governor Rick Perry?
5-4 decision; the presence of the Ten Commandments did not violate the establishment clause.
84
What was the outcome of Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC?
The ministerial exception did not apply to her case.