Definitions Flashcards
Relative atomic mass (Ar)
Ratio of the mass of the average mass of one atom of an element to 1/12 the mass of an atom of 12C isotope.
Relative molecular mass (Mr)
Ratio of the average mass of one molecule of the substance to 1/12 the mass of an atom of 12C isotope
Relative formula mass (Mr)
‘Of an ionic compound’
Ratio of the average mass of one formula unit of a compound to 1/12 the mass of an atom of 12C isotope
Relative isotopic mass (Ar)
Ratio of the mass of one atom of an isotope of an element to 1/12 the mass of an atom of 12C isotope
Isotopes
Same number of protons, different number of neutrons.
Similar chemical properties (since same no. electrons) but different physical properties (since different mass)
Mole
Amount of substance containing no. of particles that is equal to avogadro’s constant (6.02 x 10^23)
Molar mass (M)
Mass of one mole of a substance, units g/mol
Molar gas volume
Volume that 1 mole of gas occupies at a particular set of temperature and pressure
Concentration
Amount of solute dissolved per unit volume of a solution, g/dm^3
Empirical vs molecular formula
Empirical: Simplest ratio of the number of atoms of each element of a compound
Molecular: Actual number of atoms of each element of a compound
Avogadro’s hypothesis
Same volume of 2 gases under same temp and pressure contain the same number of molecules
Equivilance point
Reactants have just reacted according to stiochiometric ratio given by balanced equation of the reaction
End point
Indicator in titration has just changed colour
Sampling vs dilution
Sampling: collection of a portion of a given solution
Dilution: addition of more solvent to a given solution
Mass number
Number of nucleons in a nucleus
Atomic number
Number of protons in a nucleus
Orbitals
Region of space in which there is a high probability of locating electrons
Degenerate orbitals
Orbitals of the same energy level
Aufbau principle
Electrons will always occupy the orbitals of lower energy levels first before occupying orbitals of higher energy levels
Pauli exclusion principal
The electrons in the same orbital must have opposite spins so that they can generate sufficient magnetic force to overcome force of repulsion due to like charge
Hund’s rule
When degenerate orbitals are available, electrons will always occupy orbitals singly first before any pairing occurs to minimise interelectrostatic repulsion.
Ionisation energy
Energy required to remove 1 mole of electrons from 1 mole of gaseous atoms to form 1 mole of singly positive gaseous ions.
Spontaneous
Thermodynamically favourable
How to choose indicator?
End point should coincide with equivalence point
Why solutions can be stable for long time despite E° value of reaction being spontaneous?
Actual reaction conditions could vary greatly from the standard conditions. (Temp, pressure, concentration)
Catalyst vs enzymes
Increases rate of reaction by providing an alternative pathway with lower activation energy for reaction to occur, and is chemically unchanged (and regenerated) by the end of the reaction.
Enzymes just add ‘biological’ and ‘protein in nature’
Enzymes characteristics
Highly selective
Only work over a narrow pH range and temperature range (easily denatured)
Specific in nature (can only be used for 1 task)
highly efficient
Neither homogenous nor heterogeneous, colloidal in nature
Homogenous catalyst
Catalyst is in the same physical state as the reactants
Heterogenous catalyst
Catalyst is in a different physical state from the reactants
Homogenous mixture
Reactants and products are in the same physical state
Heterogenous mixture
Reactants and products are in different physical states
What to exclude in Kp/Kc calculations?
Conc of solids, conc of more liquids in heterogenous, conc of solvents
Why TM can act as heterogenous and homogenous catalyst?
Heterogenous: Reactants form weak interactions with surface of TM, covalent bonds in reactant molecules weakened. Ea falls, and surface conc of reactant molecules increases (allows more to come into close contact with each other in correct orientation) —> rate of reaction increases —> products desorp and catalyst can be used for other reactants
Homogenous: variable oxidation states allow TM to oxidise/reduce compounds and be regenerated by transitioning btw oxidation states —> lower activation energy needed for reaction to occur (especially btw like charge ions with very high repulsion btw them)
Complex or complex ion
Central metal atom or ions surrounded by ligands that are bonded to it through a dative bond
Ligand
Ligands are neutral molecules or anions that have at least 1 lone pair of electrons that can be used to form a dative bond with a transition metal atom or ion.
Coordination number of transition metal complex
Number of dative bonds formed between ligands and transition metal atom or ion in a complex
How is a complex formed?
TM high charge density, highly polarising, attract LP of electrons from surrounding particles towards itself.
Can accommodate more electrons also because energetically accessible vacant 3d, 4s, 4p, 4d electron subshells. Overall of empty orbital in TM atom or ion and fully filled orbital of ligand —> forms a dative bond
How stability of TM ions can be affected by dif ligands?
2024 prelim p2 qn
- haemoglobin + 4O2 ⇌ oxyhaemoglobin + 4H2O
- at high conc of O2 (eg lungs), ligand exchange happens, water ligands replaced with O2 ligands, POE shift right, H2O and oxyhaemoglobin released
Colour of TM complexes
Cu:
Cu(H2O)6 2+ blue
Cu(NH3)4(H2O)2 2+ dark blue
CuCl4 2- yellow
CuI white ppt
Cu2O brick red ppt
Cu(OH)2 blue ppt
Cr:
Cr2O7 2- orange
CrO4 2- yellow
Cr(H2O)6 3+ green
Cr(OH)3 grey green ppt
Cr(OH)6 3- dark green
Fe:
Fe(H2O)6 2+ pale green
Fe(H2O)6 3+ yellow
Fe(H2O)5SCN 2+ blood red
Fe(OH)2 green ppt
Fe(OH)3 reddish-brown ppt
Mn:
MnO4 - purple
Mn(H2O)6 2+ colourless/pale pink
Mn(OH)2 off-white ppt
Mn(OH)3 brown
MnO2 brown ppt
Al:
Al(OH)3 white
Al(OH)4 - colourless
Ag:
Ag(NH3)2 + colourless
AgCl white ppt
AgBr off-white ppt
AgI yellow ppt
Zn:
Zn(OH)2 white
Zn(OH)4 2- colourless
Zn(H2O)6 2+ colourless
Zn(NH3)4 2+ colourless
How colour arises in complexes
Assuming shape of complex as octahedral, due to ligand approach, orbitals are split into 2 dif energy levels (d-d splitting) An electron from the lower energy level absorbs a photon from the electromagnetic spectrum and is promoted to a higher energy level. Wavelength of photon is determined by degree of splitting. The colour observed is complement to those absorbed in visible region of spectrum.
Ionic bond
eFOA btw oppositely charged ions
Metallic bond
eFOA between sea of delocalised electrons and lattice of positively charged ions
Covalent bond
eFOA between shared pair of electrons and positively charged surrounding nuclei
How to determine strength of ionic bond?
Ionic bond strength: lattice energy (energy released when 1 mole of ionic solid is formed from its isolated gaseous ions an infinite distance apart)
Factors affecting metallic bond strength
Charge density of cation
No of delocalised electrons
—> more extensive/stronger eFOA
Factors affecting covalent bond strength and explain why each factor affects
Multiplicity of bond: more shared electron pairs = stronger eFOA between shared pair of electrons and nuclei of atoms = stronger covalent bond
Size of atom: smaller = less diffuse orbitals = more effective overlap = stronger covalent bond
Proximity of lone pairs: closer together = more (excessive) repulsion between LP = weaker covalent bond
Polarity: comparable size, induction of partial charges due to electronegativity differences = more polar bond, eFOA between partial charges strengthens covalent bond
Formation of dative bonds
One compound has a lone pair of electrons available for donation and the other has energetically accessible orbitals that it can use to accept electrons
NOT THE SAME as H bond! Don’t mix up!
Neither need to be highly electronegative for this
Sigma bond
Head on overlap, electron density concentrated between the nuclei of the 2 bonding atoms
Pi bond
Side on overlap, less effective, region of overlap is above and below nuclear axis, node present
Node
Region of space in which there is a zero probability of locating electrons
Ionic bonds with covalent character
Ionic bonding, assumed to be perfectly symmetrical spheres. But when oppositely charged ions are close to each other, partial sharing of electrons because cation attracts valence electrons of anion towards itself and polarises electron cloud of anion. Partial covalent character
Factors for degree of covalent character in ionic bond
Charge density of cation
Polarisibility of anion
Ionic character in covalent bond
Perfect covalent bond—> non polar only exists when electronegativities are exactly the same
Most molecules, not. Partial positive and partial negative charges induced, ionic character
Factors affecting ionic character in covalent bond
Net dipole moment (dipole moment = charge x distance between the nuclei of the 2 atoms)
Id-id, pd-pd interactions description
eFOA between polar ends of the molecule / between opposite partial charges
H bond description
eFOA between highly electron deficient H (that is covalently bonded to a highly electronegative atoms) and lone pair of electrons on highly electronegative atom
Drawing of dot and cross diagram: is it central atom or side atoms that must be satisfied?
Always satisfy Side atoms first then consider whether centre one has energetically accessible centre
Nature or bonding in AlCl3, BeCl3 and BCl3
All covalent, because high charge density of cations causes electron cloud of anion to be polarised to a very large extent (GMS)
But for AlCl3 if they ask structure, it is actually GICLS as a solid, SMS as molten/gas (period 3 notes) so this one specifically needa see context
Why mostly bonds will be hybridised orbitals?
Much more effective overlaps than s-s or p-p so much stronger bond
(s orbitals spend more time close to their respective nuclei, and less in the binding region. p orbitals spend more time in the binding region; that is close both the nuclei; thus s-p overlap forming a stronger bond than s-s overlap - https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/why-s-p-orbital-overlap-is-stronger-than-s-s-overlap.498941/#)
Why there is a difference between experimental and theoretical values of LE?
(Emphasis on ‘difference’ not larger experimental than theoretical; you can’t predict that)
Explain the covalent character thing
LE calculated on assumption that ions are 2 perfectly spherical point charges but there’s a disagreement in values for experimental (consider polarising power of cation and polarisability of anion —> degree of electron cloud distortion, electron sharing and covalent character). Higher covalent character = larger disagreement.
FYI
Hey apparently they use coloumb’s law to calculate; link btw phys electric fields and like chem ionic charge
Larger theoretical than experiential suggests covalent bonds —> ionic weakened (When ionic bonds exhibit covalent character, there is a degree of sharing of electron density between the ions. This sharing reduces the effective charge that each ion experiences, as the electron cloud is distorted so strength of ionic bonds reduced.)
vs larger experimental than theoretical suggests more energy is needed to overcome the covalent bonds between the lattice ions to break up the lattice. (Since additional bonds and interactions created ig)
Structures and descriptions
Giant metallic crystal lattice structure: orderly arrangement of metal cations and sea of delocalised electrons held together by strong eFOA between …
Giant molecular structure: each c atom is covalent bonded to .. other atoms with eFOA between shared pair of electron and nuclei of surrounding atoms … (hexagonal + layers w id-id due to delocalisation of remaining electron / extensive tetrahedral network)
Simple molecular structure: weak interactions (pd-pd/id-id/h bond) between … molecules
Giant ionic crystal lattice structure: regular arrangement of cations and anions held together by strong eFOA between opp charged ions
Electrical conductivity for each structure (what is the key thing to say?)
Ions/electrons can act as mobile charge carriers to carry charges around —> can conduct electricity
Non-conductor: no mobile charge carrier since covalent molecules in SMS are neutral/since ions are held in fixed position by strong ionic bonds (GIS)
GMS- graphite structure, good conductors in direction parallel to layers as delocalised electrons act as mobile charge carrier under applied PD but poor conductor in direction perpendicular to plane as delocalised electrons cannot jump across layers
Physical properties (for each structure)
GMCLS: ductile and malleable (mobility of delocalised electrons allows layers of cations to slide over each other without shattering structure)
GICLS: brittle (slight displacement brings together ions of like charge, shattering lattice structure), hard (strong eFOA)
GMS: diamond: hard (strong eFOA), graphite: flaky and slippery (weak idid between layers)
SMS: soft (weak idid)
Bp/mp format
Structure
Bonding
Energy
Why lone pair more repulsion that bond pair?
Lone pair held closer to nucleus than bond pair since bp shared w another atom
VSEPR theory
Electron pairs arrange themselves ard central atom to reduce repulsion, because LP-LP repulsion>LP-BP>BP-BP
Coordination number and factors
Number of closest neighbours surrounding an ion in a lattice structure
Ionic radius
VSEPR shapes, name and angle
2BP Linear, 180
3BP Trigonal planar, 120
2BP, 1LP Bent, 117.5
4BP Tetrahedral 109.5
3BP, 1 LP Trigonal pyramidal, 107
2BP, 2 LP Bent, 104.5
5BP Trigonal bipyramidal, 120, 90
4BP, 1 LP See-saw shape, 117.5, <90
3BP, 2 LP T-shaped 115, <90
2BP, 3 LP Linear, 180
6BP Octahedral, 90
5BP, 1 LP square pyramidal, <90
4BP, 2 LP square planar, <90
Electrolytic vs Electrochemical cell
Electrolytic cell: electric energy to chemical energy
Electrochemical cell: chemical energy to electrical energy