Definitions

Question 1

Define Evidence

Answer 1

“Evidence” is the term for the whole body of material which a court or tribunal – ie in criminal cases the Judge or jury – may take into account in reaching their decision. Evidence may be in oral, written or visual form

Question 2

Define Admissible Evidence

Answer 2

Evidence is admissible if it is legally able to be received by a court.

Question 3

Define Relevance in relation to Evidence

Answer 3

Evidence is relevant “if it has a tendency to prove or disprove anything that is of consequence to the determination of a proceeding” (s7(3)of the Evidence Act 2006).

Question 4

Define Facts in Issue

Answer 4

Evidence is relevant “if it has a tendency to prove or disprove anything that is of consequence to the determination of a proceeding” (s7(3)of the Evidence Act 2006).

Question 5

Define Exclusionary Rules

Answer 5

These are rules that exclude evidence (usually because it is unreliable, unduly prejudicial or otherwise unfair to admit it).

Question 6

Define Weight of Evidence

Answer 6

The “weight” of evidence is its value in relation to the facts in issue. The value will depend on a wide range of factors, such as:
* the extent to which, if accepted, it is directly relevant to or conclusive of, those facts
* the extent to which it is supported or contradicted by other evidence produced
* the veracity of the witness. The “weight” is the degree of probative force that can be accorded to the evidence

Question 7

Define Offer Evidence

Answer 7

Evidence must be elicited before it is “offered”: Merely putting a proposition to a witness is not offering evidence; it becomes so when the witness accepts the proposition – s96(1) of the Evidence Act 2006. Offering evidence in the Evidence Act 2006 includes eliciting evidence by cross-examination of a witness called by another party.

Question 8

Describe the ways to Give EVIDENCE

Answer 8

“Giving evidence” is included in “offering evidence”: a witness “gives evidence”; a party “offers evidence”. A party who testifies both gives and offers evidence.

Ordinary way: either orally in a courtroom in the presence of a judge (or judge and jury), parties to the proceeding, counsel, and members of the public allowed by the judge; or in an affidavit filed in court or by reading a written statement in a courtroom, if both prosecution and defence consent, the statement is admissible, and it is the personal statement of the deponent or maker;

Alternative way: – in the courtroom but unable to see the defendant or other person; outside the courtroom; or by video recording made before the hearing. The Courts (Remote Participation) Act 2010 provides for audio and visual communication between participants (by audio-visual link), when some or all of them are not physically present at the place of hearing for all or part of the proceeding. The criteria under that Act does not limit the operation of ss103-106 of the Evidence Act 2006, which provides for applications and directions regarding alternative ways of giving evidence;
Any other way: provided for by the Evidence Act 2006 or any other relevant enactment

Question 9

Define Incriminate

Answer 9

To incriminate is to provide information that is reasonably likely to lead to, or increase the likelihood of, the prosecution of a person for a criminal offence.

Question 10

Define Proceedings

Answer 10

This means a proceeding conducted by a court, and any application to a court connected with a proceeding.

Question 11

Define Statement

Answer 11

This is a spoken or written assertion by a person, or non-verbal conduct of a person intended by that person as an assertion of any matter

Question 12

Define Witness

Answer 12

This is a person who gives evidence and is able to be cross-examined in a proceeding.

Question 13

Define Hearsay Statement

Answer 13

This is a statement that was made by a person other than a witness, and is offered in evidence in the proceeding to prove the truth of its contents. This definition means that out-of-court statements made by a “witness” are not excluded by the hearsay rule because the maker is available to be cross-examined. Such statements may still be excluded by a different rule. A statement offered for some purpose other than proving the truth of its contents, for example merely to show that the statement was made or uttered, is not a hearsay statement.

Question 14

Define Veracity

Answer 14

This is the disposition of a person to refrain from lying, whether generally or in a proceeding.

Question 15

Define Propensity

Answer 15

Propensity evidence is evidence about a person’s propensity to act in a particular way or have a particular state of mind, and includes evidence of acts, omissions, events or circumstances with which a person is alleged to have been involved.

Question 16

Define Direct Evidence

Answer 16

This is any evidence given by a witness as to a fact in issue that he or she has seen, heard or otherwise experienced (e.g. an eyewitness who states that she saw the defendant stab the complainant with a knife).

Question 17

Define Circumstantial Evidence

Answer 17

This is evidence of circumstances that do not directly prove any fact in issue, but which allow inferences about the existence of those facts to be drawn (e.g. the defendant was seen in the vicinity of the scene of the crime).

Question 18

Define Enforcement Agency

Answer 18

This refers to the New Zealand Police or anybody or organisation that has a statutory responsibility for the enforcement of an enactment, including the New Zealand Customs Service, the Ministry of Fisheries and the Inland Revenue Department.

Question 19

Define “Beyond reasonable doubt”

Answer 19

The courts have been reluctant to provide a detailed definition for this meaning. However in the R v Wanhalla and after reviewing models overseas, juries have been told that this means “an honest and reasonable uncertainty left in your mind about the guilt of the defendant after you have given careful and impartial consideration to all of the evidence”
In summary, if, after careful and impartial consideration of the evidence, you are sure that the accused is guilty you must find him or her guilty. On the other hand, if you are not sure that the accused is guilty, you must find him or her not guilty. ”

Question 20

Define Balance of Probabilities

Answer 20

Where the defence is required to prove a particular element, such as insanity, on the balance of probabilities, it must simply show that it is more probable than not. If the probabilities are equal, the burden is not discharged.

Question 21

Define Expert s4 EA06

Answer 21

Section 4 of the Act defines an “expert” as “a person who has specialised knowledge or skill based on training, study or experience”
The expert is required to demonstrate to the court that he or she has the requisite qualification to be deemed “expert” in the field in question; the expert may be qualified through formal study and training, from experience, or both. Evidence offered by an expert should be within his or her area of expertise

Question 22

Define Corroboration

Answer 22

It not defined in the act. However It is independent evidence that tends to confirm or support some fact of which other evidence is given and implicates the defendant in the crime charged