Definition of abnormality ( 1+2 ) Flashcards
Definitions of abnormality
- statistical infrequency
- deviation from social norms
- failure to function adequately
- deviation from ideal mental health
Statistical infrequency
when an individual has a less common characteristic therefore its abnormal
Deviation from social norms
concerns behaviour that is different from the accepted standards of behaviour in a community or society so therefore its abnormal
Strengths of statistical infrequency - real life application
P: real life application
E: diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder
E: a useful part of clinical assessment.
L: is beneficial in identify individuals with abnormal behaviours and will potentially aid them in pursuing treatment.
Limitation of statistical infrequency - unusual characteristics can be positive
P:unusual characteristics may be positive
E: An IQ over 130 is unusual, however, it is not undesirable and does not require treatment.
E: not all statistical infrequent behaviours are negative.
L: Therefore, it cannot be used on its own to diagnose disorders.
Strengths of deviation from social norms - real life application
P: there are certain behaviours that are less desirable than others.
E: high levels of aggression is considered in society.
E: identifying deviations from social norms - e.g. aggression - this can allow the development of treatments which will enable the individuals to perform socially acceptable behaviours.
L: used to identify and treat individuals with abnormal behaviour.
Limitation of deviation from social norms - cultural relativism
P: cultural relativism
E: This is because social norms vary tremendously in cultures and between cultures. For example, hearing voices is acceptable in African-American cultures, however, considered a mental abnormality in the UK.
E: cannot be used to identify abnormal behaviour in other cultures.
L: Therefore, is limited by its cultural bias.
norms are specific to the culture we live in
relatively a few behaviours that would be considered universally on the basis that they breach social norms
for example, homosexuality is considered as abnormal in some cultures
failure to function adequately
occurs when someone is unable to cope with ordinary demands of day-to-day living, so they are considered abnormal
deviation from mental health
occurs when someone does not meet a set of criteria for good mental health so they are abnormal
David Rosenhan and Martin Seligman ( 1989 )
they have proposed some additional signs that can be used to determine when someone is not coping
- when a person no longer conforms to standard interpersonal rules
- when a person experiences severe personal distress
- when a person’s behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to themselves or others
Marie Jahoda ( 1958 )
we are in good mental health if we meet this criteria :
- we have no symptoms or distress
- we are rational and perceive ourselves accurately
- we self-actualise
- we can cope with stress
we have a realistic view of the world
- we have good self-esteem and lack guilt
- we are independent of other people
- we can successfully work, love and enjoy our leisure
Strengths of failure to function adequately - represents a sensible threshold for when people need professional help
- most of us have symptoms of mental disorder to some degree at some time - around 25% people in UK experience this
- treatment and services can be targeted to those who need them most
Limitation of failure to function adequately - discrimination and social control
- in practice, it can be very hard to say when someone really failing to function and deviate social norms
- for example, not having a job or permanent address
However, some choose to live off grid - those who have high risk leisure activities or unusual spiritual practices - risk of being labelled abnormal and freedom of choice may be restricted
Strength of ideal mental health - comprehensive
- Jahoda’s concept covers most of the reasons why we might see for help with mental health
- can be discussed meaningfully with a range of professionals who might take different theoretical views