Defenses to Formation Flashcards

1
Q

Hurdles to Formation (SEAMMDULL)

A

Statute of Frauds, Existing Law Prohibiting Performance, Ambiguity in Words, Mistake At Time of the Agreement As to Material Fact, Misrepresentation, Duress, Unconscionability, Lack of Capacity from Promisor, Lack of Consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Infancy

A

Lack of Capacity: Child under 18 lacks capacity to enter into contracts.

However, adult to child contracts are binding on adult.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Disaffirmance

A

Lack of Capacity: Infancy: infanct may choose to disaffirm a contract ANY TIME before (or shortly after) reaching 18

If disaffirmed infant must return anything THAT STILL REMAINS at the time of Disaffirmance that infant received under contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Affirmance

A

Lack of Capacity: Infancy: Infant may affirm upon reaching 18.

May affirm either expressly or by conduct

(FAILING TO DISAFFIRM within a REASONABLE time after Reaching Age of Majority)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mental Incapacity

A

Lack of Capacity: Person so deficient that he is incapable of understanding the NATURE AND SIGNIFICANCE of the contract MAY DISAFFIRMED when lucid or by legal representative.

May likewise affirm.

Contract is VOIDABLE

Liable in Quasi-Contracts for necessities furnished to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intoxicated Persons

A

lack of capacity: So intoxicated to not understand that substance and nature of the contract.

Voidable promise if other party had reason to know of intoxication

Liable for necessities provided to them during intoxication under Quasi-Contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Duress and Undue Influence

A

Duress: Contracts are voidable.

Generally taking advantage of another person’s economic needs IS NOT DURESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Statute of Frauds

A

Contracts that need to be in writing, signed by the parties intended to be bound.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Writing Requirement of SOF

A

Something written evidencing material terms which is signed by the party intended to be bound.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Agreements Covered by SOF

A

Executor/Administrator Promises to Personally pay Estate Debts, Surety Promises/ Promises in Consideration of Marriage (Pre-Nups), Interests in Land (leases/easment for more than 1 year), Performance Not Within 1 year (excluding lifetime contracts), Goods Priced at $500 or more.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Surety Promises

A

A promise to answer for the debt or default of another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Executor/Administrator Promises to Personally to Pay Estate Debts

A

A promise to pay the estate’s debts OUT OF OWN FUNDS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Promises In Consideration for Marriage

A

Promises that induce marriage by offering something of value, prenups (ect.,)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Interests in Land

A

Leases/Easement more than 1 year, Fixtures, Minerals, Mortgages,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Performance Not Within One Year

A

Promise by its terms CANNOT BE COMPLETED WITHIN ONE YEAR

EFFECTIVE DATE: Date runs from the date of agreement

LIFETIME CONTRACTS: Not within SOF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Goods Priced at $500 of more (SWAP)

A

Must meet SOF,

Exceptions:
Specially Manufactured Goods   
Admission in Pleadings or Court
Payment or Delivery of Goods   
Merchant Confirmatory Memo
17
Q

Specially Manufactured Goods

A

Sellers made a SUBSTANTIAL BEGINNING in the manufacturing or committments

18
Q

Satisfaction of SOF

A

Full performance by either party.
Part Performance, but only to the extent of Part Performance.
Part Performance for Real Estate Contracts (2 out of 3)

19
Q

UCC SOF

A

Contens of the writing, who signed the writing, QUANTITY TERM

20
Q

Merchant’s Confirmatory Memo

A

Both parties MUST BE MERCHANTS, person who receives a signaled writing WITH QUANTITY TERM, that claims there is not a contract FAILS TO RESPONSE WITHIN 10 days

21
Q

Equal Dignity Rule

A

One can execute a contract for someone else, however, the authorization MUST BE IN WRITING if the contract to be signed IS WITHIN THE SOF.

22
Q

Contract Modification and the SOF

A

Look at deal with alleged change AND determine whether the deal with the alleged change would be within the SOF.

IF it is then the modification must be in writing

23
Q

Common Law Modifications and SOF

A

Contract provision requiring all modifications to be in writing are ignored

24
Q

UCC Contract Modifications and the SOF

A

Contract provision requiring written modifications are effective unless waived

25
Q

Illegality

A

Existing Law:

If subject matter is illegal = agreement is void
If subject matter is legal, but purpose is illegal = enforceable
ONLY IF THE PERSON DID NOT KNOW OF THE ILLEGAL PURPOSE

26
Q

Unconscionability

A

Unfair surprise and oppressive terms as of the time of the agreement.

27
Q

Ambiguity in Words of Agreement

A

Parties use MATERIAL TERM OPEN TO AT LEAST WO REASONABLE INTERPRETATIONS; AND

each party ATTACHES A DIFFERENT MEANING TO THE TERM; AND

NEITHER PARY KNEW OR HAS REASON TO KNOW THE TERM IS OPEN TO AT LEAST TWO REASONABLE INTERPRETATIONS

28
Q

MISTAKE

A

Mutual Mistake and Unilateral Mistake

29
Q

Mutual Mistake

A

If both parties are mistaken AND basic assumption of fact AND materially affects the agree exchange the CONTRACT IS VOID.

VALUE IS NOT A DETERMINATIVE FACTOR

30
Q

Unilateral Mistake

A

Generally courts don’t allow excuse by unilateral mistake

EXCEPTION: Palpable Mistake:

Other party knew or should have know of the mistake, or Mistake was discovered before significant reliance by the other party.