Defenses to contract Flashcards
What are the seven defenses to a Contract
Misunderstanding Incapacity mistake fraud and Misrepresentation Duress Illegality Unconscionability
Misunderstanding
when each party is saying the same thing but attaching
a different meaning to different things
What do you need to show for Misunderstanding as a
defense?
Must show
1. parties used a material term which is open to one or two
interpretations- the objective standard test governs
- each side attaches a meaning to each of those terms
- either party knows about or should know about the
confusion
Incapacity
when one party lacks the capacity to contract
who is protected under Incapacity to K?
- Minors - under 18
- intoxicated PPL (if the other side knows) treated as if
they’re mentally ill - mentally ill- two standards
a. the person cannot under the nature and
consequences of his actions orb. the person cannot act in a reasonable manner and the
other side knows this
Who gets the most and least protection in incapacity to K defense?
Minors get the most protection- blanket rule
Mentally ill get intermediate protection
intoxicated get the least- depends on the other side konws
Exceptions to voidable incapacity K?
Gen Rule= incapacitated person can disaffirm the contract
Exceptions
- When necessities are involved
- the party w/o capacity must still pay fair value for the
necessity
- Necessities are things that you need to live i.e.
food,
shelter, - After/When capacity is obtained/regained
- a party w/o capacity can also ratify the deal after they
become capable- EX. if a 16 y/o after 18 can ratify- once ratified can’t void
- Less protection for intoxicated but different for the mentally ill - usually after they reach a lucid period
- EX. if a 16 y/o after 18 can ratify- once ratified can’t void
Mistake
a belief that is not in accord w/ a present fact
2 types of mistake
1. mutual - effects both parties 2. unilateral - one side is fundamentally affected by the mistake- the other side is unaffected or does not care.
When can a party rescind in a MUTUAL MISTAKE scenario?
Adversely affected party can rescind K if:
- there is a mistake of FACT existing at the time the deal is
made (not an opinion) - The mistake relates to a basic assumption of K and has
a material impact on the deal; AND - The adversely affected party must not have assumed the risk
EX. a compromise of conscious ignorance - buying assumes risk since both are unaware
Who can use UNILATERAL MISTAKE defense?
The affected party proves all the elements of mutual mistake PLUS show that
either-
1. the mistake would make the K unconscionable OR
- the other side knew of it, had reason to know, or caused the mistake
Fraud
Two types
Fraud in the execution
- trick someone into signing something they don’t even
know is a K
Misrepresentation
Misrep - false statement at the time of K, can be accidental
Must show that there is a misrep of
- a present FACT(not opinion)
- that is MATERIAL or FRAUDULENT misrep
- which Is made under the circumstances where it’s justifiable to rely on the Representation
Nondisclosure
- close to misrep
is when seller remains silent
Gen Rule- normally you don’t have to tell the other side everything related to the deal
Exception
- active concealment - is tantamount to fraud
- special fiduciary duty
Duress
is an improper threat that deprives a party from making a meaningful choice to K.
2 TYPES
- UNDUE INFLUENCE
- arises when a party puts very intense sales pressure on another party who often seems weak minded or susceptible to high-pressure sales tactics. - ECONOMIC DURESS
- when one party makes threats to induce another party to K (or modify a K)
Illegality
illegal Ks are unenforceable BUT a K entered in furtherance of an illegal act (that is not itself illegal) will still be enforced.
The law will leave the parties where they stand, but there is a modern trend toward allowing less-guilty parties to recover restitution (i.e get their money back)
- Ks against Public Policy will not be enforced - meaning Ks that are not formally illegal but present some other pp concern… EX. broad exculpatory agreements