Defenses Flashcards
What are the primary defenses to crimes?
insanity; intoxication; self-defense; defense of others; defense of dwelling; mistake of fact; mistake of law; ignorance of law; entrapment.
Explain the M’Naghten Rule for insanity
at the time of his conduct, the defendant lacked the ability to know the wrongfulness of his actions or understand the nature and quality of his actions.
Explain the Irresistible Impulse Test for insanity
the defendant lacked the capacity for self-control and free choice.
Explain the Durham Rule for insanity
the defendant’s conduct was a product of mental illness.
Explain the Model Penal Code test for insanity
the defendant lacked the ability to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law.
Voluntary Intoxication is a defense only to . . .
specific intent crimes.
Addicts and alcoholics are considered as being . . .
always voluntarily intoxicated.
Involuntary intoxication is a defense to . . .
all crimes.
When may a victim use non-deadly force in self-defense?
where the victim reasonably believes that force is about to be used on him.
Under the majority rule, when may a victim use deadly force in self defense?
under the majority rule, the victim may use deadly force in self-defense any time the victim reasonably believes that deadly force is about to be used on him.
Under the minority rule, when may a victim use deadly force in self defense?
under the minority rule, a victim must attempt a retreat if it is safe to do so. However, a victim need not retreat if they are 1) in their home; 2) the victim of a rape or robbery; or 3) they are police officers.
To get the defense of self-defense, the original aggressor must . . .
1) withdraw; and 2) communicate that withdrawal.
When may a defendant raise the defense of defense of others?
if the defendant reasonably believes that the person assisted would have had the right to use force in his own defense.
Duress is a defense to a criminal act if . . .
1) the person acts under the threat of imminent infliction of death or great bodily harm; and 2) that belief is reasonable.
Can threats to third parties suffice for a claim of the defense of duress?
yes