Defenses Flashcards

1
Q

When can a party argue mutual mistake as a defense to the enforcement of a contract?

A

the contract may be voidable if 1) the mistake concerns a basic assumption on which the contract is made; 2) the mistake has a material affect on the agreed-upon exchange; and 3) the party seeking avoidance did not assume the risk of the mistake.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

If only one of the parties to a contract is mistaken about facts relating to the agreement, the mistake will not prevent formation of the contract unless . . .

A

the nonmistaken party knew or had reason to know of the mistake made by the other party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Where an offeror transmits an offer to an intermediary, and the intermediary transmits the offer to the offeree incorrectly, which version of the offer governs?

A

the version of the offer transmitted by the intermediary unless the other party knew or should have known about the mistake.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the result where there is a term in a contract subject to at least two possible meanings, and one of the parties was aware of the ambiguity but did not inform the other party of the ambiguity?

A

there is an enforceable contract, where the ignorant party’s understanding of the contract prevails.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fraud in the Inducement

A

where one party induces reliance by another party on facts that the inducing party knows are not true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Are contracts which are caused by fraud in the inducement automatically void?

A

No, they are voidable; i.e. they are capable of being voided at the choice of the defrauded party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When is a non-fraudulent misrepresentation voidable?

A

if the misrepresentation was material.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When can a minor disaffirm a contract?

A

at any time, so long as it was the minor who entered into the contract with the adult.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When can an adult disaffirm a contract with a minor?

A

if the contract was made by the adult to the minor, they cannot disaffirm and the minor can enforce the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If a minor chooses to disaffirm the contract with an adult, what must she do?

A

she must return anything she received under the contract that still remains at the time of disaffirmance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Can a minor disaffirm a contract for necessaries?

A

Yes, but she is liable for restitution for the value of benefits received.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Where a minor makes a contract, and later reaches the age of majority, may he still disaffirm?

A

yes, so long as he does not affirm the contract first. A contract by a minor is not automatically affirmed by his reaching the age of majority. He must somehow affirm it while over 18 to bind himself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A person who is mentally incapacitated when a contract is first formed can either affirm or disaffirm the contract when . . .

A

they are lucid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is a person who was intoxicated at the time of their entering into a contract bound by the contract?

A

yes, if the other party did not know of their intoxication; no, if the other party had reason to know of the intoxication. However, an intoxicated individual can affirm a contract they entered into while intoxicated once they have sobered up.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Contracts induced by duress or undue influence are _____________.

A

voidable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does taking advantage of a person’s economic needs considered duress?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Are threats against one’s property considered duress?

A

Yes

18
Q

The Statute of Frauds requires that certain agreements be . . .

A

written and signed by the party to be charged.

19
Q

Do emails evincing a contract satisfy the statute of frauds?

A

yes

20
Q

Can several pieces of paper satisfy the statute of frauds?

A

yes

21
Q

Does writing on a napkin showing the particulars of the contract satisfy the statute of frauds?

A

yes

22
Q

Under the SoF, must a signature be handwritten?

A

No, it can be typed or printed, so long as it is intended to be a signature.

23
Q

What can suffice to be a signature under the UCC?

A

a party’s initials or letterhead.

24
Q

Must both parties to a contract sign the contract under the SoF?

A

No, only the party to be charged.

25
Q

Must a contract to build a building on the land be written and signed under the SoF?

A

No, these are not covered by the SoF because they do not create an interest in land.

26
Q

________________ by the seller will take a contract out of the statute of frauds.

A

full performance

27
Q

________________ by the buyer will take a contract out of the SoF.

A

partial performance

28
Q

When is a writing not required under the SoF?

A

there are three instances where a writing is not necessary under the SoF because the terms are satisfied: 1) specially manufactured goods; 2) admissions in pleadings or court; and 3) if goods are received/accepted or paid for.

29
Q

The Merchant’s Confirmatory Memo rule only applies to what kind of contracts?

A

oral contracts between merchants.

30
Q

How long does a receiver of a merchant’s confirmatory memo have to object to the memo before it is binding on both parties?

A

10 days

31
Q

What is the effect of a contract not meeting the requirements of the SoF?

A

the party to be charged can choose not to enforce the contract. If they choose to enforce it anyways, the statute is waived.

32
Q

Where a buyer makes an oral promise to pay for real estate and there is no writing, the seller can avoid having to make a writing by . . .

A

conveying the land to the buyer; i.e. completing performance. Complete performance by a seller removes a contract from the statute of frauds.

33
Q

Where a seller makes an oral contract to sell real estate to a buyer and there is no writing, the buyer can avoid having to make a writing by . . .

A

partial performance. Partial performance by a buyer to an oral sale of land contract takes a sale of real estate out of the statute of frauds.

34
Q

When does partial performance of a sale of goods contract take the contract out of the statute of frauds?

A

where the goods are 1) specifically made; or 2) the goods have been either paid for or accepted.

35
Q

An oral contract that cannot be completed within one year but has been fully performed by one party is _____________.

A

enforceable

36
Q

Is a contract with unfair prices for goods unconscionable?

A

No

37
Q

A contract contains a clause which shifts the burden of risk of loss normally borne by one party to another. Is this unconscionable?

A

yes

38
Q

A contract contains a provision stating that the buyer takes the goods as they are and that the seller is not responsible for any defects in them. Unconscionable?

A

yes

39
Q

An exculpatory clause releasing a party from _____________ behavior is unconscionable, whereas an exculpatory clause releasing a party from ______________ conduct are usually upheld if the clause is not inconspicuous.

A

intentional wrongful; negligent

40
Q

Are contractual clauses limiting liability for damages unconscionable?

A

Generally, no.

41
Q

Unconscionability is determined by the circumstances as they existed at the time . . .

A

the contract was formed.

42
Q

How will a court treat a contract in which there is an unconscionable provision?

A

the court will either 1) refuse to enforce the contract; 2) refuse to enforce the specific provision while keeping the rest of the contract enforceable; or 3) limit the application of any clause so as to avoid an unconscionable result.