Defenses Flashcards
7 Defenses to Contract Formation
- Misunderstanding
- Incapacity
- Mistake
- Fraud/Misrepresentation/Nondisclosure
- Duress
- Illegality
- Unconscionability
Misunderstanding
Each party attaches different meanings to the same words and neither party knows or should have known of the confusion.
Parties use a MATERIAL TERM that is OPEN TO TWO OR MORE reasonable interpretations
Who lacks capacity to make a contract?
Minors, Mentally Ill (see standards), Very intoxicated persons
Minors who contract
Blanket prohibition - contract is always voidable by the minor
Two standards for those who are mentally ill
- Cannot understand the nature and consequences of their actions [no knowledge req for other party]
- Cannot act in a reasonable manner in relation to the transaction [other party MUST KNOW]
Very Intoxicated persons who contract
Other side must know they are intoxicated - if they appear lucid, contract is NOT voidable
What happens if a party without capacity contracts for necessities?
They must still pay the fair value (NOT necessarily the contract price)
What happens after capacity is obtained?
Party who was without capacity can RATIFY the deal by keeping the benefits (after capacity is obtained)
Mistake
belief that is not in accord with a PRESENT fact (not future!)
Mutual Mistake lets the adversely affected party rescind IF…
- There is a mistake of fact at the time the deal was made
- The mistake relates to a basic assumption of the contract AND has a material impact on the deal
- The impacted party did NOT assume the risk of the mistake
Unilateral mistake lets the adversely affected party rescind IF…
- Prove ALL the elements of mutual mistake (existed at the time of the deal, material impact/basic assumption, no risk assumed)
- AND mistake would make the contract unconscionable OR other side knew/had reason to know/caused the mistake
Defense of misrepresentation must show…
- Misrepresentation of a PRESENT fact (not an opinion)
- That is material OR fraudulent misrepresentation
- That was made under circumstances in which is was justifiable to rely on the misrepresentation
This allows you a defense even when it was an INNOCENT material mistake
Nondisclosure - do you normally have a duty to tell the other side all material facts about a deal?
Not normally…EXCEPT
- Special fiduciary relationship
- active concealment
Duress
Improper threat that deprives a party from making a meaningful choice to contract (see economic duress and PA rules)
Undue Influence
A party puts very intense pressure on another party who seems weak minded or susceptible to high-pressure tactics