Defenses Flashcards

1
Q

Self-Defense

A

against non-deadly force; against deadly force; timing requirement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Self defense Against non-deadly force

A

when attacked, reasonable(necessary) force to defend yourself; actor is liable for usign excessive force; no duty to retreat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Self-defense against deadly force

A

deadly force if he reasonably believes it will be used; no duty to retreat in your own home; or retreat nto safe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Self-defense Timing Requirement

A

threat must be imminent; no revenge aspect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Defense to 3rd person

A

reasonable force to defend 3rd person from harm; must correctly and reasonably believe intervention is necessary and V has right of SD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Defense to property

A

reasonable force to prevent/ terminate another’s intrusion upon land/chattels if: intrusion is not privilged, believe use of force only way to prevent intrusion, actor has asked target to stop and they ignore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Defense to property (Force)

A

never use deadly force to defend property unless human is in danger, trespasser has privilege to defend himself from excessive force or confinement, amount of force depends on the nature of trespasser

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Contributory Negligence

A

if P is in any way negligent no recovery; Standard of care is same as negligence; 4 states have this MD is one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Last Clear Chance Doctrine

A

remedy to the harshness of CN; allows P to recover if CN; person with LCC to avoid accident and fails is liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2 situations when LCC is available

A

D did not see peril of P but should have, could have avoided accident with reasonable care; D DID see P or peril of P should have appreciated the danger and failed to take reasonable care to avoid injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Elements of LCC in MD

A

D had actual knowledge of Ps CN; D could avoid accident with Reasonable care; D act/failure to act occurred after P was CN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Assumption of Risk

A

P voluntarily assumes a risk of harm from the negligent or reckless conduct of D; P cannot recover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

AoR person has to

A

actually know and appreciate the danger; subjective standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

4 types of AoR

A

Express assumption of known risk; implied assumption of risk; involuntary assumption; voluntary assumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Express assumption of known risk

A

P expressly agrees to accept a risk/harm from D’s negligent conduct; P cannot recover unless agreement is invalid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Implied AOR

A

P knows appreciates, and understands the risk created by D’s negligent or reckless conduct and voluntarily subjects himself to the risk

17
Q

involuntary assumption

A

reasonable encounter of a risk created by D

18
Q

Voluntary assumption

A

unreasonable encounter of a risk created by teh D

19
Q

AOR does not apply

A

statutes; common carrier; intentional torts

20
Q

Patent Danger Rule

A

no duty owed to those who encounter dangerous conditions that are open and obvious; no BOP on D

21
Q

Sudden Emergency Rule

A

not liable for reasonable response to sudden emergency, so long as person did not create the emergency

22
Q

Comparative negligence

A

allows P to recover if CN; liability with fault; trier of fact weighs P’s negligence against D to reduce damages

23
Q

Types of Comparative Negligence

A

pure CPN; Modified CPN; Phantom tort feasors;

24
Q

Pure Comparative negligence

A

P can recover unless his Neg is sole Prox Cause of the harm (100%)

25
Q

Modified Comparative Negligence

A

some degree of contributory negligence bars all recovery and a lesser degree diminishes recovery

26
Q

50% rule

A

P cannot recover if 51% negligent; less than 50% can recover

27
Q

49% rule

A

P can recover if 49% or less; if 50% or greater then cannot recover

28
Q

Immunities

A

avoids liability in tort under all circumstance; does not deny the tort but the liability; does not excuse intentional torts

29
Q

Governmental Immunity

A

municipal gov are immune from liability from injuries resulting from functions which deal with the judgment and discretion of planning and policy making

30
Q

Parental Immunity

A

children and 3rd parties cannot sue parents; no reasonable person standard for parents;

31
Q

Charitable immunity

A

immune b/c they do good for public interest; act in the interest of the public; may seek damages up to insurance costs

32
Q

MD rules for immunity

A

can sue up to 200,000; no punitive damages; parent immunity for negligence; charitable immunity (sue up to amount of insurance); invasion of privacy; intentional tort