Defenses Flashcards
m’naughten tet
at the time of commission
such a defect of reasoning due to disease of the mind
-didnt understand nature and quality of his act (lemons/ wife’s throat)
-if he did, didn’t know what he was doing was wrong
irresistable impulse test
mental disease kept him from controlling conduct
durham rule
unlawful act was the product of mental disease or defect (but-for)
MPC
-result of mental disease/ defect
-lacked substantial capacity to appreciate wrongfulness of conduct or
-conform conduct to the req of law
—-
MD
diminished capacity
result of mental defect
didnt have a state of mind that’s an el of the offense
–
Not a thing in MD
vol intox
defense if it negates a req MR. not recklessnes, neg, SL
invol intox
is a defense under the same circ as insanity
infancy- CL
under 7: total incapacity
7-14: rebuttably presumed to lack crim capacity
14+: responsible as adults
self defense
reas belief imminent danger of unlawful bod harm amnt of force nec to prevent such harm not the inital aggressor maj: no duty to retreat -- MD reasonable, honest belief not the aggressor not unreasonable force duty to retreat (unless in dwelling) -aggressor can use if he communicates withdrawal
defense of 3p: mistaken belief that 3p was in danger…?
reasonable but mistaken = ok
necessity
avoid imm inj resulting from natural forces
OR
where D believes a greater harm would result from compliance w the law
duress
not a defense to murder
-reas believes
only way to avoid unlawful threats of great bod harm or imm death is to engage in unlawful conduct
entrapment
crim act is the product of creative activity, originating w law enf officials
-D is in no way predisposed to commit the cr
mistake of fact
negates MR- there would be no crime if things were as D nbelieved them to be,
gen intent: must be reasonable
spec intent: must be honest
mistake of law
not a def