Defenses Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

TYPES OF DEFENSES

A

Failure of proof, offense modification, justifications, excuses, nonexculpatory public policy defenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

FAILURE OF PROOF

A

An individual’s simplest defense in a criminal prosecution is to claim that the prosecution has not or cannot prove an element of the offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

OFFENSE MODIFICATIONS

A

In rare cases, all of the elements of the offense are satisfied but the actor has not caused the harm or evil sought to be prevented by the statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

JUSTIFICATIONS

A

Where the harm was justified (that is, right and good) given the circumstances (ex., self-defense, defense of others, etc.). Applies to all offenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

EXCUSES

A

Excuses admit that the deed may be wrong, but excuse the actor because conditions suggest that the actor is not responsible for their deed (ex., insanity, PTSD, etc.). Applies to all offenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

NONEXCULPATORY PUBLIC POLICY DEFENSES

A

Where the actor is blameworthy/culpable for the offense, but there is a societal benefit from foregoing their conviction.

Example: Foreign Immunity, Incompetency, Judicial, Legislative, and Executive Immunities. Each further an important societal interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

SELF-DEFENSE: C/L

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

SELF-DEFENSE: MPC 3.04(1)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

S/D NECESSITY REQUIREMENT

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

AGGRESSOR

A

Cannot claim the right of self-defense, but can regain the right upon communicating to the adversary an intention to withdraw and attempting to do so in good faith (Peterson).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

APPROACHES TO RETREAT

A

“Retreat to the wall” (minority; common law) vs. SYG when reasonably necessary for self-preservation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

STAND YOUR GROUND (SYD)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

RETREAT-TO-WALL

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

CASTLE DOCTRINE

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

S/D REQUIREMENTS

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

S/D REASONABLE BELIEF

A
17
Q

S/D AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

A
18
Q

BATTERED WOMAN/SPOUSE SYNDROME

A
19
Q

NECESSITY DEFENSE

A
20
Q

N/D REQUIREMENTS

A
21
Q

N/D: MPC vs. C/L APPROACHES

A