Defences to TATP and the Rule in Wilkinson Flashcards

1
Q

What can Consent not be induced by

A

A fraud misrepresentation or duress

R v Williams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Consent - Adults and Medical practice

A

Adults of sound mind are capable of consenting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Consent - Children and Medical Practice

A

Children can consent to medical treatment in certain situations

CF Gillick v West Norfolk AHA

Parents may consent on their behalf

Re W

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Limits to consent

A

Criminal law places limits on the potential to consent to ABH, uncertain whether these considerations apply in tort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Necessity

A

Rarely invoked, allows intervention on the basis that it allows the defendant to prevent greater harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Self defence - Proportionality in Tort

A

Different to criminal law

Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex

Defendant needs to demonstrate that their conduct was reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Self Defence - Excessive Force

A

Lane v Holloway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Self Defence - Proportionate force

A

Cross v Kirkby

Court also took into account that it happened in the heat of the moment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Provication

A

Not a defence

Lane v Holloway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Contributory Negligence

A

Not applicable to intentional torts

Cooperative Group v Pritchard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lawful Authority

A

Encompasses power held by the police ect, but also citizens undertaking arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly