Defences - Short Answers Flashcards
Define the term justified
In relation to any person, “justified” means that the person is not guilty of an offence and is not liable civilly
What is R v Forest and Forest
The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of the Victim’s age.
What is R v Clancy
The best evidence as to the date and place of a child’s birth will normally be provided by a person attending at the birth or the child’s mother… Production of the birth certificate,if available, may have added to the evidence but was not essential.
What happens where 10-13 year olds are charged with Murder?
10 to 13 year olds charged with Murder or manslaughter are usually dealt with under the youth justice provisions of the CYPF Act. However charges of murder or manslaughter will be heard in the High Court following the first appearance in the Court in which the charging document was filed.
What does protected from criminal responsibility mean?
Protected form criminal responsibility means not guilty of an offence but civil liability may still arise
What type of defence does a child under 10 have?
A child under 10 years has an absolute defence
What is the standard of proof required to prove the defence of insanity to the satisfaction of the Jury?
On the balance of probabilities
Is the term disease of the mind a question of fact for the jury or a question of Law for the Judge to decide?
A question of Law
What are the two types of automatism?
The two types of Automatism are sane and insane
How is automatism described
Automatism is best described as a state of total blackout, during which a person is not conscious of their action and not in control of them.
What is the likely result of a trial where the defendant is found to have been in a state of automatism from intoxication?
The result of a trial where the defendant is found to have been in a state of automatism from intoxication is complete acquittal
What is R v Cottle? - Burden of Proof
R v Cottle
As to degree of proof, it is sufficient if the plea is established to the satisfaction of the jury on a preponderance os probabilities without necessarily excluding all reasonable doubt
What are M’Naghten’s rules
The M’Nahhten’s rules (or test) is frequently used to establish whether or to a defendant is insane. It is based on the person’s ability to think rationally, so that is a person is insane they were acting under such a defect of reason from a disease of the mind that they did not know:
- The nature and quality of their actions, or
- the what they were doing was wrong
What is R v Codere
The nature an quality of the act means the physical character of the act. The phrase does not involve any consideration of the accused’s moral perception nor his knowledge of the moral quality of the act. Thus a person who is so deluded that he cuts a woman’s throat believing that he is cutting a loaf of bread would not know the nature and quality of his act
What is R v Cottle - Automatism
Doing something without knowledge of it and without memory afterwards of having done it - a temporary eclipse of consciousness that nevertheless leaves the person so affected able to exercise bodily movements.