Defences (other people) Flashcards
Define/describe “compulsion or duress”
The act of compelling a person to do something against their will.
Legally, a person can be said to be acting under “compulsion” if they commit an offence having been: ______…
Compelled to do so by threats of immediate death or GBH to them or another person present
Threats involved in a defence of compulsion must be ___________ at the time of the offence, and be so grave that they might well have caused a ___________ to act the same way
Operating on their mind
Reasonable person placed in the same situation
Regarding the defence of compulsion, What is meant by the term “belief must be genuine”?
They must genuinely believe the threat of death/GBH and must not be a party to any association or conspiracy involved
For a defence of compulsion,
The threats of death/GBH must be _________ and from a person ______ at the time
Immediate
Present
(Though different standards may suffice for women and children)
R v Joyce is an illustration of how to decide who is actually “present” re a defence of compulsion.
Explain r v Joyce
The court of appeal decided that the compulsion must be made by a person who is present when the offence is committed.
In this case the guy was inside the service station while Joyce was outside Joyce was not threatened with immediate death from someone who was present.
Is “mistake” an available defence?
Yes, except for cases where you don’t have to prove mens rea
Classic example is tomato vs cannabis
Is entrapment an available defence?
No, NZ courts have rejected entrapment as a defence,
However! It’s is up to the discretion of the judge to exclude evidence that would operate unfairly against the defendant ie when undercover police have overstepped the line.
Police v Lavelle
It’s permissible for undercover officers to merely provide the opportunity for someone who is ready and willing to offend
So long as the officers did not initiate the persons interest or willingness to so offend
As per s48 CA, define
self defence and the defence of another
Everyone is justified in using, in the defence of himself or another’s such force as, in the circumstances as he believes them to be, it is reasonable to use.
What is the subjective-objective test regarding using self defence as a defence?
- what are the circumstances that the defendant genuinely believed existed? (Subjective)
- do you accept the defendant genuinely believes those facts?
- is the forced used reasonable in the circumstances? (Objective)
What if the force used in “self defence” is clearly unreasonable?
They may be liable of excessive force under s62 crimes act (or unable to use as a defence to the charge)
Who decides on the evidential threshold for using “self-defence” as a defence?
The judge decides whether the evidence could be the basis for a self defence argument, then leaves it to the jury.
Is it possible for a pre-emptive strike to apply to a defence of self defence?
Yes
Consider the woman who stabbed her husband genuinely believing that her and her son would be shot if she did not.
Define “alibi” as per chambers dictionary
The plea in a criminal charge of having been elsewhere at the material time- the fact of being elsewhere