Defences involving other people Flashcards
Explain Section 24 Compulsion:
A person who commits an offence under compulsion by threats of immediate death or GBH from a person who is present is protected from liability if they believe that the threats will be carried out and they are not party to any association or conspiracy.
Immediacy and presence required for compulsion:
The threats of death or GBH must be immediate and from a person present at the time.
However, different standards may suffice where women and children act under threats
Is a ‘mistake’ available as a defence?
Except in cases where proof of intent is unnecessary, mistake or ignorance is available as a defence.
E.g. mistaking cannabis seeds as tomatoes
Explain entrapment:
Entrapment occurs when an agent of an enforcement body deliberately causes a person to commit an offence, so that person can be prosecuted.
Can Entrapment be a defence in NZ?
The Courts have rejected entrapment as a defence per se, preferring instead to rely on the discretion of the trial judge to exclude evidence that would operate unfairly against the defendant.
How would the court assess fairness regarding ‘entrapment’ by law enforcement?
In assessing fairness, the court will examine the reason the defendant was targeted and the way in which the agent was involved in the initiation of the offending activity,
Explain Section 48 - Self Defence
Everyone is justified in using, in defence of himself or another, using such force as, in the circumstances as he believes them to be reasonable
Explain the subjective/objective test regarding Self Defence:
Subjective - Deciding that force is required
Test of reasonableness
Objective - The degree and manner of the force used
What is the testing criteria for the degree of force used in Section 48 - Self Defence:
- What are the circumstances that the defendant genuinely believes exist (whether it is mistaken belief or not)
- Do you accept that the defendant genuinely believes those facts
- Is the force used reasonable in the circumstances
Who decides the evidential threshold for self defence?
The judge decides whether evidence that could be the basis for self-defence is fit to be left to the jury.
Self defence should be put to the jury unless it would be impossible for the jury to entertain a reasonable doubt.
What was shown regarding self defence in R v Ranger (preemptive)
if the defendant really did think the lives of herself and her son were in peril because of the deceased it could be reasonable that a pre-emptive strike with a knife would be reasonable force
Define ‘alibi’
“The plea in a criminal charge of having been elsewhere at the material time: the fact of being elsewhere”
Explain Section 22 of the Criminal Disclosure Act - Notice of Alibi
If a defendant intends to adduce evidence in support of an alibi, the defendant must give written notice to the prosecutor.
Within 10 working days
What must be included in the written notice to the prosecutor regarding an defendants alibi?
- Name and address of the witness
- If name and address not known to the defendant when the notice is given, any matter known by the defendant that might be of material assistance in finding that witness
What is the O/C responsibilities regarding a defendant’s alibi?
Ensure a QHA and active charges report is prepared on the witness
Make inquiries to confirm or rebut evidence in support of the alibi