Defences in Tort Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What type of defence is contributory negligence?

A

General and partial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What Act does contributory negligence come under?

A

LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) ACT 1945

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is contributory negligence?

A

The amount of damages awarded against D can be reduced by the judge according to the extent to which C has contributed to their own harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What must D prove to be successful with contributory negligence?

A
  • C was negligent in that she failed to take reasonable care in the circumstances for her own safety
  • C’s fault was a contributory cause of the harm suffered
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the case JONES V LIVOX QUARRIES say about contributory negligence?

A

C’s behaviour must mean that the harm was reasonably foreseeable and C should take into account the possibility of others being careless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

At what age are people incapable of contributory negligence?

A

Under 5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does the case FROOM V BUTCHER say about contributory negligence?

A

C’s fault must have helped to cause the harm that she suffered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What type of defence is consent?

A

Complete

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does D need to prove to be successful with consent?

A

C was aware of the specific risk of injury that occurred and C willingly agreed to run the risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the case MORRIS V MURRAY say about consent?

A

Where C is intoxicated, the question is whether C was so intoxicated that she was incapable of appreciating the specific risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the case SMITH V CHARLES BAKER & SONS say about consent?

A

The defence will not succeed where C has no choice but to accept the risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does the case HAYNES V HARWOOD say about consent?

A

Consent is not available where C is a rescuer going to a person’s aid because they are under a moral or legal duty to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does the case ICI V SHATWELL say about consent?

A

If an employee acts against employer’s orders or statutory rules then consent will be available

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does the case CONDON V BASI say about consent?

A

In a sporting context, consent will succeed where the injuries are a result of conduct that falls within what can be reasonably expected in the sport

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly