Defences - Chapter 6 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

How much the defendant prove their defence applies

A

On the balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When will ex turpi cause non oritur actio defences be used

A

Claimant was in criminal act When they suffered harm

Or

They allege they committed a crime as a result of defendants negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Volenti non fit injuria defences

A

Claimant gave voluntary informed consent to the activity that involved the injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Contributory negligence defence

A

Claimant was part to blame for the accident, put themself in dangerous position of increased the extend of their own injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

S2 unfair contract terms act 1977 or s65 CRA 2015 defence

A

Contractual exclusion clause that limits defendants liability to the claimant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Function of a defence

A

To reduce or eliminate the defendants liability for the damage suffered by the claimant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a complete or full defence

A

A defence which completely absolves the defendant of all liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Two important common law defences

A

Ex Turpi causa non oritur actio

Volenti non fit injuria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ex Turpi causa covers…

A

Connection between illegal activity and the claimant with the injury they’ve suffered

The damage arose directly out of the illegal activity

It would be contrary to public policy to allow the claimant remedies

Clunis v Camden (mental health patient stabbed a man)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Inextricable link test

A

Ex Turpi causa defence to apply there must be a link between the criminal act and loss claimed.

Gray v Thames trains ltd - dismissed claim

Allen v Hounga - upheld claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Volenti non fit injuria defence

No injury can be done to a willing person

A

Defence must show the claimant voluntarily consented with knowledge of the risk to injury. Stermer v Lawson

Consent must be freely given smith v baker

(Employers must establish that the employee had agreed to and took part in the dangerous activity) imperial chemicals v shatwell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

If a person rescues someone but sustains injury can they claim

A

Yes, providing they did not feel they had any choice but to reduce the victims. They did not freely consent.

Ward v T E Hopkins and son

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can Sport spectator injury be claimed

A

Not usually as the spectators are considered as knowing the risk when attending an event - Murray v harringgay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the outcome of a contributory defence

A

Reduction in the amount of damages which are paid by the defendant.

Law reform (contributory negligence) act 1945

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How must the defendant prove contributory negligence

A

The must prove

Claimant is partly to blame for the accident in which they are injured- Fitzgerald v Lane

Claimant has put themselves in a dangerous position which exposed them to risk to be injured - Davies V swan motor co

Claimant fails to take reasonable car for their own safety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When will the court be reluctant to hold that a claimant has been contributory negligent.

A

The claimant is a child

The claimant is an employee

The claimant was a rescuer

The claimant was in a ‘dilemma principle’ (difficult situation)

17
Q

Limitation period under s2 limitation act 1980

A

Period of 6 years from the date of cause of action arose

18
Q

When does s2 not apply

A

If claimant is under disability(under age)

Or deceased

19
Q

What is statue barred

A

Limitation time frame has passed

20
Q

3 exceptions to 6 year rule

A

Personal injury cases

Death of the claimant

Latent damage

21
Q

When does the limitation period begin for personal injury

A

When the wrong doing occurred

When the injury was sustained

When the claimant had knowledge of the injury

Hayward and others v fawcetts and another - the relevant date is not when the claimant first knew they had a claim but the earlier date when they first knew enough to begin investigating the defendants negligence

22
Q

What is limitation for death of a claimant

A

3 years upon the date of death or when their relatives or representatives had knowledge of the death

23
Q

What is limitation for latent damage

A

6 years from damage is done

Then further 3 years when claimant discovered the damage

24
Q

What is long stop

A

No claim can be raised more than 15 years after the date of defendants negligence

25
Q

Ss62, 65CRA or S2 unfair contract terms act provide that… (limitation clauses)

A

It is impossible got anyone to exclude or restrict their liability for personal injury or death caused by their negligence

And

Any clauses excluding or restricting liability for other damages or loss as a result of their negligence are not valid if they are unfair.