Defences A01 Flashcards

1
Q

Define Volenti

A

if the claimant has voluntarily undertaken the risk of harm then they have no claim against the party who inflicted it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What type of defence is volenti

A

complete defence = the defendant will incur no liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Consent must be….. (case)

A

Freely given, not under duress - Bowater v Rowley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Test for volenti

A

subjective test to assess whether the claimant had the knowledge and capacity to understand the risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The mere fact the claimant is aware of the risk.. (case)

A

is not conclusive proof they have consented to it - Smith v Baker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

There are occasions where the courts have allowed the defendant employers to rely on volenti like in… (case)

A

ICI v Shatwell where the employees had undertaken an unsafe method of working entirely of their own accord and in breach of explicit instructions given by their employer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define contributory negligence

A

when the claimant is partly responsible for the harm they have suffered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What must be established foe contributory negligence

A

That the defendant was negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

judge in Froom v Butcher held that if a defendant didn’t wear a seatbelt there are set percentages that would apply to the damages:

A

If wearing a seatbelt would:

  • not made any differences to the injuries sustained - no reduction
  • have lessened the severity of her injuries - 15% reduction
  • have prevented the injuries - 25% reduction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Children (case)

A

allowances are made for children, lower standard of care - Gough v Thorne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Law on mistakes regarding contributory negligence (case)

A

usually mistakes made, especially in the heat of the moment they will not be found contributory negligent - Jones v Boyce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Law on drunk drivers regarding contributory negligence (case)

A

if the claimant gets into the car with a driver they know to be drunk then they may be found to have been found ti have contributed to their own injuries as held in Owen v Brimmel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly