Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

criminal law > Defences > Flashcards

Defences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

where was automatism introduced?

A

Ross v HMA 1991

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what was the law prior to Ross v HMA 1991 on mental defences?

A

only insanity was an accepted mental defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what crimes does automatism defend against?

A

defence to any crime that requires mens rea, because punishing people who lack mens rea does not fulfill the main aims of punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the case authority for Automatism and what was the definition provided?

A

Ross v HMA “a total alienation of reason” or “an external factor which was not self-induced”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

where was the definition provided in Ross v HMA 1991 reinforced?

A

Cardle v MUlrainey 1992

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what does the automatism defence not cover?

A

irresistible impulses and voluntary intoxication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what evidence is required to use the defence of automatism?

A

medical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the problems with the defence of automatism (2)?

A
  • does not include factors beyond control but not external. For instance, diabetes, sleepwalking
  • if acquitted court no power to make order for public protection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the key legislation for mental disorder defence?

A

Criminal Procedure Act 1995 s51

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is mental disorder a defence to?

A

any crime that requires mens rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

if both automatism and mental disorder result in acquittal, why distinguish between mental disorder and automatism?

A
  • episodes of mental disorders might recur, therefore law allows for public protection
  • states of automatism (caused by an external factor) are less likely to be repeated and so does not allow for public protection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the legal definition of the disturbed state of mind which the mental disorder defence involves?

A

An inability at the time of the conduct constituting the offence “to appreciate the nature or wrongfulness of the conduct”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the good thing about the flexibility of the definition of mental disorder? (3)

A
  • Appreciation is broader than mere knowledge and includes a level of rational understanding.
  • “wrongfulness” includes moral and legal wrongfulness. HM Advocate v Sharp 1927 JC 66
  • The test contains two alternative conditions – EITHER the nature OR the wrongfulness of the conduct.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What caused the inability to appreciate the nature or wrongfulness of the conduct?

A 
mental disorder; defined as: 
Defined as: 
“mental illness; 
personality disorder; or learning disability, 
however caused or manifested”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what conditions are excluded from the defence?

A
  • psychopathic personality disorder

- implies irresistible impulses and voluntary intoxication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who bears the burden of proving that the accused does/does not qualify for Mental Disorder Defence and to what standard must this be proved?

A

The accused must prove the defence of Mental Disorder on the balance of probabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is unfitness for trial?

A

A person who is suffering from mental disorder at the time of the trial may be able to rely on a plea in bar of trial, which means that they cannot be tried.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

how is the unfitness for trial different to the Mental Disorder Defence?

A

This is different from the Mental Disorder Defence, which can be raised if the person is fit for trial, but was suffering from a mental disorder AT THE TIME OF THE ‘CRIME’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what is the definition of Diminished responsibility?

A

“the person’s ability to determine or control conduct for which the person would otherwise be convicted of murder was, at the time of the conduct, substantially impaired”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

where can the definition of diminished responsibility be found

A

Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 s51B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

To which crimes will Diminished Responsibility provide a defence?

A

This defence only applies to murder.

22
Q

What caused the substantial impairment of the ability to determine or control conduct with regards to diminished responsibility? (3)

A
  • Abnormality of mind’ CP(S)A 1995, s51(B)(1)
  • Diminished responsibility includes mental disorder. CP(S)A 1995, s51(B)(2)
  • Diminished responsibility can be based on the condition of psychopathic personality disorder.
23
Q

what is excluded from the scope of the defence of diminished responsibility?

A

voluntary intoxication

24
Q

Who bears the burden of establishing the defence of Diminished Responsibility and to what standard?

A

“It is for the person charged with murder to establish, on the balance of probabilities, that the condition set out in subsection (1) is satisfied.”

25
Q

what changes does the defence of diminished responsibility make?

A

If the defence of diminished responsibility is established then:
‘A person who would otherwise be convicted of murder is instead to be convicted of culpable homicide’ CP(S)A 1995, s51B(1)

26
Q

is necessity a complete defence?

A

ye

27
Q

what crimes is necessity available to?

A

all crimes except murder

28
Q

when does necessity apply?

A

when breaking the law is necessary in order to avoid dangerous circumstances (availability subject to various limitations)

29
Q

when is the defence of necessity appear to be a justification?

A

where breaking the law is clearly the lesser evil

30
Q

what happens when both options are equally bad, with regards to necessity?

A

the defence looks like an excuse

31
Q

what is the case authority for necessity?

A

Lord Advocates Reference No 1 of 2000

32
Q

What was the Lord Advocates Reference definition of necessity

A

good cause to fear the death would result unless he acted

33
Q

what were the seven requirements for necessity laid out in the Lord Advocates Reference

A
  • Good cause to fear that death or serious injury would result unless he acted;
  • Immediate danger;
  • At the material time there was no alternative course of action;
  • At the material time, have reason to think that the acts carried out had some prospect of removing the perceived danger.
  • That cause for fear must have resulted from a reasonable belief as to the circumstances;
  • The actor must have been impelled to act as he did by those considerations;
  • The defence will only be available if a sober person of reasonable firmness, sharing the characteristics of the actor, would have responded as he did.
34
Q

what case demonstrates the immediacy of the danger aspect of necessity

A

Ruxton v Lang 1998

35
Q

what is coercion

A

when someone threatens to harm the accused if he does not break the law

36
Q

what is the difference between necessity and coercion

A

breaking the law to avoid dangerous circumstances other than a kind of threat

37
Q

is coercion a complete defence?

A

yeah

38
Q

what crimes are exempt from the defence of coercion

A

murder

39
Q

what is the key case for the defence of coercion and what did it conclude?

A

Thomson v HM Advocate 1983

that there must be threats of death or serious injury against or a third party

40
Q

What factors suggest the accused is telling the truth about being coerced?

A

A backward and inferior part in the perpetration

Disclosure of the fact as well as the restitution of the spoil on the first safe and convenient occasion.

41
Q

what is the case authority for self- defence

A

HMA v Doherty 1954

42
Q

what are the three requirements for self-defence?

A

Imminent danger to life or limb

No reasonable opportunity to retreat

Reaction must be proportionate

43
Q

in a self- defence case accused has to satisfy all requirements. What case emphasised this?

A

Pollock v HMA 1998

44
Q

what is meant by a necessary and proportionate response?

A

General rule:

You cannot kill to prevent non-fatal attack.

Protection of life is crucial.

Right to life is a human right.

45
Q

is self- defence an accident?

A

not an accident if there is an intention to kill or injure

46
Q

what are the two types of provocation recognised?

A

provocation by assault or provocation by infidelity

47
Q

what is the case authority for Provocation?

A

Drury v HMA 2001, it set out requirements

48
Q

what are the requirements of the defence of Provocation?

A
  • a recognised provocation
  • loss of self control
  • be proportional
49
Q

Infedelity is only a defence in Scotland. What is the problem with this defence?

A

sexual autonmy implies right to choose to leave relationship whenever chooses

50
Q

is the defence available to all?

A

yes regardless of gender or sexual orientation

51
Q

what is the “ordinary person test”?

A

A person of same age & sex with normal self-restraint & tolerance might have reacted that way in those circumstances.

criminal law (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions