Defamation, Privacy, Dignitary Harms Flashcards
What are the elements of defamation?
- defamatory statement
- that specifically identifies P (reader would understand who it was)
- published to a third party
- damage to P reputation
- falsity of statement
- fault on the part of D
What is a defamatory statement? Must be on face?
One tending to adversely affect one’s reputation. Statement of opinion is only actionable if it appears to be based on specific facts. Name-calling insufficient.
If not defamatory on face, can plead additional facts as inducement to establish defamatory by innuendo.
Cam you defame dead person? Corp?
No, yes
is extrinsic evidence allowed to prove that defamatory statement refers to P?
Yes - this is called colloquium.
Can statement re a group be actionable defamation?
- if refers to all members of small group - yes
- if refers to some members of small group - yes, if P can show reader would view statement as referring to them
- large group - NO
Must publication of defamation be intentional?
Publication must be intentional but not defamation itself.
What is the single publication rule?
Generally, each repetition of statement is considered separate publication for damages purposes, but now most states have single publication rule which says copies of periodicals/newspapers/etc. are all treated as one publication.
Who may be held liable for defamation?
Primary publishers to same extend as author or speaker.
Anyone who repeats (even if says they do not believe it) (?)
not ISPs
What damages must defamation P show?
Depends on type of defamation:
(1) libel: defamation in permanent form (writing, tv) - general damages are presumed, P does not need to prove special damages
- minority jdx’s: ONLY if statement is libel on its face will they presume general damages, otherwise require special damages proof
(2) slander: spoken defamation - P must prove special damages UNLESS the statement:
- adversely reflected the P’s biz or profession
- stated P committed serious crime
- impute P w/ serious sexual misconduct
- state P has loathsome disease
When does P have to prove falsity?
Most jdx’s require P to prove falsity. At c/l rule was D use truth as defense. Some states still follow c/l rule - but even then P will have to prove falsity in cases where P is obligated under 1A to prove fault.
What degree of fault must defamation P show?
In general, majority states req. showing of fault in all cases (negligence+).
(1) public official or public figure - ACTUAL MALICE
- public figure = someone who has achieved pervasive fame or notoriety OR by voluntarily assuming a central role in a particular public controversy
- actual malice = knowledge of falsity OR reckless disregard wrt falsity
(2) private person + matter of public concern - NEGLIGENCE
- if negligent, then can only recover for actual injury (= any proven injury)
- if actual malice found, damages presumed + can get punitives
What are 3 possible defenses to defamation?
- consent - complete defense (valid, knowing, voluntary, etc)
- truth (when P not obligated to prove)
- privilege
(a) absolute privilege for comms between spouses + remarks made during judicial proceedings, by legislators during proceedings (ANY comments), or by federal executive officials in compelled broadcasts
(b) qualified privilege - D has burden to show privilege applies i.e. that there is public interest in encouraging candor (e.g. references and recs, reports of public hearings, statements made to ppl taking official action, statements made in defense of self/reputation)
What are the 4 types of invasion of privacy? What is req’d of all?
- appropriation of P’s picture or name
- intrusion on P’s affairs or seclusion
- publication of facts placing P in false light
- public disclosure of private facts about P
Reqs:
- personal right - doesn’t extend to others
- must be proximately caused by D
- NO need to prove special damages - emotional distress and mental anguish sufficient
Does P need to prove special damages in invasion of privacy claim?
No - emotion distress and mental anguish are enough
What is appropriation of P picture/name claim?
- unauthorized use
- of P photo or name
- for D’s commercial advantage
Note: liability generally limited to ads, promotions (mere economic benefit insufficient)