defamation Flashcards
what is the definition of defamation?
the publication of a statement which reflects on a person’s reputation and tends to lower him in the estimation of right-thinking members of society
what are the two forms of defamation?
slander and libel
what is slander?
temporary form
spoken words, gestures, sign language
what are the requirements of slander?
allegation has been published to more than one person
allegation must refer to claimant
words spoken tend to lower the claimant in the eyes of right thinking members of society
publication is likely to have or has caused serious harm
what is the test for remoteness of damage for slander?
Lynch v Knight
the loss is such as might fairly and reasonably on the facts of the case have been anticipated and feared to result
what situations will the courts presume that damage has occurred - slander?
- imputation of a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment
- imputation of professional unfitness or incompetence
- imputation of unchastity or adultery by a female
- imputation of a contagious disease
what is libel?
a permanent form
requirement for serious damage
what will a libel claimant have to prove?
as a fact on the balance of probabilities that serious reputational harm was caused or likely to be caused
what are the defences to defamation?
- truth
- honest opinion
- absolute privilege
- qualified privilege
- publication on a matter of public interest
how can someone raise the defence of truth?
defendant must prove on the balance of probabilities that the statement is substantially true
the most important part must be true
how can someone raise the defence of honest opinion?
3 requirements:
- must be a statement of opinion
- basis for this opinion must consist of a comment on a set of facts
- must be reasonable
how can someone raise the defence of absolute privilege?
applies where the need to protect freedom of speech is so important that an absolute defence is necessary
how can someone raise the defence of qualified privilege?
applies in situations where it is desireable that freedom of speech is protected but author is acting honestly and without malice
how can someone raise the defence of publication on matters of public interest?
defendant can show that the statement was or formed part of a statement on a matter of public interest and the defendant reasonably believed that publishing the statement was in the public interest
how can you mitigate your loss as a defendant?
honestly and reasonably believing a statement to be true so published it
mistaken identity intending a statement to refer to someone else