Def Elements And Causation Flashcards

1
Q

Def Elements And Causation

A

Concise description of a conduct that a person can be held liable for
Not general for all crimes
Allows ordinary persons and court to knw which requirements to apply to a certain crime
Whoever does x commits a crime
Is a description of the kind of act prohibited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Difference between Def elements of a crime and definition of a crime

A

Def of a crime… Includes elements of crime and Req for Unlawfulness and culpability

Def elements… Not including Unlawfulness or culpability

Xs act is the realization of the Def elements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

List the forms of Causation

A

Formally defined crimes and materially defined crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is formally defined crimes

A

Defitional elements that prescribes a particular type of conduct irrespective of the outcome.
Must include an act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are materially defined crimes

A

Defitional elements that do not prescribe a specific conduct but that any conduct causes a specific condition.
Not concerned with how.
Must be an act
Aka result or consequence crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe what is meant by a casual link

A

In materially defined crimes.. Must be a casual link between xs conduct and the prohibited result.
Did xs act precipate ys death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain causing of death

A

Time and circumstances that resulted in someone’s death…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the principles that determine causation

A

Factual and legal causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is factual causation

A

Conditio sine qua non… But for.

If not for persons action wld x still be alive… If cannot think away the end result then guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is legal Causation

A

Policy considerations that it is reasonable and fair tht xs act caused ys death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What constitutes legal causation

A

Various tests tht courts use to establish if x is the legal cause of a person’s death.
Eliminating factual causes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Theories of legal Causation

A

Individualisation
Adequate causation
Novus actus interveniens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain individualisation theory

A

Many conditions or factors that result in factual cause that is eliminated, look for the most operative for legal cause

Problem.. 2 or more condos can be operative in equal measures
If more than 3 persons can’t regard one as the only cause of another’s death

Little support of this test tdy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain adequate Causation

A

Aka the generalization theory
Ordinary person with certain type of conduct and certain type of result.
Contrast of normal with abnormal

It is a legal cause of a situation if according to human experience in the normal course of events, the act brings about tht kind of a situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain Novus actus interveniens

A

New intervening event
An event occurs between xs act and ys death tht breaks chain of Causation.

Def Novus is if an constitutes an unexpected, abormal or unusual occurrence, occurrence that according to general human experience, deviates from normal course of events or cannot be regarded as a probable result of xs act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why does Novus differ frm adequate?

A

Novus an act cannot be such if x knew or for saw it may occur

17
Q

Courts approach to legal Causation theories

A

Courts have no single one tht is right or wrong
Guided by policy considerations
Reasonable, fair and just
Use more than one specific theory
Can also base legal Causation on considerations outside of specific theories

18
Q

What is similar to Novus and adequate?

A

Both are based on consequences expected to occur from a type of conduct in which x engaged in and consequences not normally expected to occur frm such conduct