Deductive arguments Flashcards

1
Q

What is a deductive argument?

A

An argument of such a form that if it’s premises are true, the conclusion must be true too

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Modus ponens

A

If p, then q.
p.
Therefore, q.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Modus tollens

A

If p, then q.
Not-q.
Therefore, not-p.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hypothetical syllogism

A

If p, then q.
If q, then r.
Therefore, if p then r.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is q and p

A

q is the consequent, p is the antecedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Disjunctive syllogism

A

p or q.
not-p.
therefore, q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Dilemma

A

p or q.
if p then r.
if q then s.
therefore, r or s

(hedgehog dilemma –> closer 2 hedgehogs get, the more likely they are to poke each other, but if they remain apart, they will be lonely. therefore, they suffer physically or emotionally)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reductio ad absurdum

A

A version of modus tollens, means “reduction to absurdity”
Arguments by reductio establish their conclusions by showing that assuming the opposite leads to absurdity

  • to prove: p
  • assume the opposite: not-p
  • Argue that from the assumption we’d have to conclude: q
  • show that q is false (contradictory, ‘absurd’)
  • conclude: p must be true after all
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

An argument of such a form that if it’s premises are true, the conclusion must be true too

A

What is a deductive argument?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If p, then q.
p.
Therefore, q.

A

Modus ponens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If p, then q.
Not-q.
Therefore, not-p.

A

Modus tollens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

If p, then q.
If q, then r.
Therefore, if p then r.

A

Hypothetical syllogism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

q is the consequent, p is the antecedent

A

What is q and p

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

p or q.
not-p.
therefore, q

A

Disjunctive syllogism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

p or q.
if p then r.
if q then s.
therefore, r or s

(hedgehog dilemma –> closer 2 hedgehogs get, the more likely they are to poke each other, but if they remain apart, they will be lonely. therefore, they suffer physically or emotionally)

A

Dilemma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A version of modus tollens, means “reduction to absurdity”
Arguments by reductio establish their conclusions by showing that assuming the opposite leads to absurdity

  • to prove: p
  • assume the opposite: not-p
  • Argue that from the assumption we’d have to conclude: q
  • show that q is false (contradictory, ‘absurd’)
  • conclude: p must be true after all
A

Reductio ad absurdum