Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Public International Law Exam > deck_4619318 > Flashcards

deck_4619318 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Civil Procedure 1L flashcards MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards
1
Q

State responsibility is a fundamental principle of international law.

A

J. Crawford, S. Villapando.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The burden of the proof is on the country that is asserting the breach. Charges of exceptional gravity must be proved by evidence that is fully conclusive.

A

The Genocide Convention Case (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Responsability is a necessary corollary right. All rights of international character involve international responsability. Responsibility results in a duty to make reparations if the obligation is not met.

A

Spanish Zone of Morocco Case - Judge Huber

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

It is a principle of international law, and an even greater conception of law, that any breach of an engagement gives rise to responsibility.

A

The Chorzow Factory case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Every internationally weongul act of a state entails the international respons.

A

Art 1. Draft Articles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Art 1 has been applied in

A

Corfu Channel, Military and Paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

There can be distinctions between the obligations of a state towards international community and the to another state.

A

Barcelona Traction case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Every state, by virtue of its membership in the international community has a legal interest in the protection of certain basic rights and fullfilment of certain obligations.

A

Barcelona Traction case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

There is an I.W.A. when the conduct(act or omission):a) Is ATTRIBUTABLE to the Stateb) Consititutes a breach of International Obligations.

A

Art. 2 Draft Articles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Art 2 was applied in the case of

A

United States Diplomats and Consular Staff in Therna

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The characterization of an act of state as internationally wrongful is governed by international law.

A

Art 3 Draft Articles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Municipal law is irrelevant (droit interne) when assesing international responsibility.

A

Reparation for Injuries case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

There is a breach of international obligaiton when the conduct of the state is not in conformity with what is required by that obligation, regardless of its origin.

A

Art 12 Draft Articles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Any violation by a State of any obligation, of whatever origin gives rise to S.R. and consequently to a duty of reparation.

A

Rainbow Warrior Case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Art 12. also applied in

A

Oil Platforms case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

State responsibility can co-exist with individual responsibility

A

Genocide Convention case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

State Organs - The conduct of any state organ shall be considered as an act of state (principle coming from customary law)

A

Art. 4 Draft Articles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Art 4 is one of the cornerstones of S.R.

A

Genocide Convention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

According to a well established rule of IR, the conduct of any state organ must be regarded as an act of that state.

A

Difference Relation to Immunity from legal Process of Special Rapporteur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The conduct of a person that is not a state organ but which is empowered by the law of that state to exercise elements of governamental authoritithy shall be considered an act of state. (Parastatal entities - prison guards)

A

Art 5 Draft Articles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Conduct of organs put at the disposal of another state

A

Art 6 Draft. A.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Even if it is ultra vires it still an act of state

A

Art 7 - Caire Case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

It is a clearly established principle of international law that acts of state will be regarded as such even if they are ultra vires.

A

Sandline case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

The conduct of a person is considered an act of state if that person is actiong on the instructions of, or under the discretion or control of that state.

A

Art 8 DA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

The degree of control may vary according to the case

A

Tadic Case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Insurgents

A

Art 10 DA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Conduct ackwoledged and adopted

A

Art 11 - Tehran Case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

The conduct shall be considered as an act of state if the person was in fact exercising elements of the governamental authority.

A

Art. 9 DA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Consent as precluding SR

A

Art. 20

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Self Defence precluding SR

A

Art. 21 - Legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Countermeasures

A

Art. 22

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Requirements for countermeasures: 1 Taken in response to previous IWA of another state.2. Directed against that state.3. Only to discountinue the act

A

Gabcikovo Nagymaros Project case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Countermeasures must be proportionate

A

Art. 51

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

an injured state may only take countermeasures against a state responsible to induce the latter to comply with the obligations that arise from the worngufl act

A

Art. 49

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Obligations are not affected by counter measures

A

Art. 50

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Force Majeure

A

Art. 23 - Serbian Loans, Gill case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

The test to apply for force majeaure is absolute and material impossibility

A

Rainbow Warrior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Distress - Wrongfulness is precluded if the author had no reasobale way, in a situation of distress of saving the author’s life.

A

art 24 DA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Rainbow Warrior Requirements for Distress

A
  1. Existence of exceptional circumstnaces.2. The re-establishement of the intitial situation asap.3. Existence of good faith in the effort
40
Q

Necessity - May not be invoked unless the act was the obly means for the state to safeguard an essential interest against a grave and imminent peril

A

Art. 25

41
Q

Necessity is a ground recognised in international law for precluding wrongfulness on an EXCEPTIONAL basis

A

Gabcikovo - Nagymaros

42
Q

Nothing in this chapter precludes the wrongfulness of non compliance with Jus cogens

A

Art 26 DA

43
Q

The injured state can invoke the respobsibility

A

Art 42

44
Q

Cessation

A

Art 29

45
Q

Germany raised issues about the assurance of non repetition

A

Le Grand case

46
Q

Reparation - inclues damage weather material or moral

A

Art. 31

47
Q

The esential princple contained is that the reparation must as far as possible wipe out all the consequences of the ilegal act and re-establish the situation

A

Chorzow Factory

48
Q

Forms of Repatation - Restitution- Compensation - Satisfaction

A

Art 34.

49
Q

Restitution )in kinda the most obivous

A

art 35 - PULP MILLS Case Arg v Uru (customary )

50
Q

Restitution is no bueno. It counts only for calculating damages

A

BP Case

51
Q

Compensation - for damages caused, including loss of profits

A

Art 36, Gabcikovo Nagymaros, I’m Alone case

52
Q

Punitive damages do not exist in IL

A

Velasques Rodriguez v Honduras

53
Q

Satisfactionn

A

Art 37 - Corfu Channel Case

54
Q

We the peoples of the UN determined: to save succeding generations from the scrouge of war

A

Preamble

55
Q

Art. 2(4) UN Charter

A

All members shall refrain in International relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other matter inconsistent with the purpse of the UN.

56
Q

Art 2(4) is a cornerstone of the Charter

A

Armed activities on the territory of the Congo DRC v Uganda

57
Q

Use of force does not extend to economical measures

A

Nicaragua

58
Q

The prevailing view is that force is confined solely to armed force used directly or indirectly.

A

Bronwlie

59
Q

Art 2(4) prohibits all types of armed force, from the slightest to the most severe

A

Corfu Channel case

60
Q

Singnalled intention to use force if certain events occur is a threat

A

Legality of the threat or use of Nuclear Weapons

61
Q

Although the prohibition is clear on its face, the treat of force remains a part of everyday life on the international plane, and state practice has demonstrated a certain tolerance to it

A

Brownlie

62
Q

Increasing levels of armaments it’s not against 2(4)

A

Nicaragua

63
Q

Passing trough an international strait with a warship us not against 2(4)

A

Corfu Channel

64
Q

Provides that the UN shall ensure that state which are not memebers of the UN act in accordance with these principles so far as it is necessary for the maintance of international peace and security.

A

Art. 2(6)

65
Q

The use of force beyound frontiers in the territory of another state.

A

Art 2(4)

66
Q

Outside the scope: target killings, the use of force against insurgents, non military effects

A

Art 2(4)

67
Q

The use of force is lawful if it is not directed against the teritorial integrity of a state. BOWETT

A

Bowett

68
Q

Art 2(4) prohibits all uses of armed forces in international relations. BROWNLIE

A

Brownlie

69
Q

Nothing in the present charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self defence if an armed attack occurs against a state member

A

Art 51 UN Charter

70
Q

Self defence is part of customary Law

A

Nicaragua

71
Q

“the sending by or on behalf of a state of armed bands, groups, irregulars or mercenaries, which carry out acts of armed force against another state of such gravity as to amount to an actual armed attacked conducted by regular forces”

A

Nicaragua

72
Q

In order to resort to self defence, a state has to be able to demonstrate that it has been the victim of an armed attack. It bears the burden of proof.

A

Oil Paltforms case

73
Q

The meaning of armed attack remains controversial, particularly in relation to international responses to terrorism. It appears that it will be discussed on a case by cases basis. BROWNLIE

A

Brownlie

74
Q

1368 and 1373(2001)

A

Us right to self defence

75
Q

2249(2015)

A

France-ISIS

76
Q

State practice has become, since 2001, more accepting to self defence in relation to non state actors.

A

Brownlie

77
Q

Collective self defence requirements

A

Nicaragua

78
Q

Any kind of weapon, including nuclear if proportionate

A

Legality of the threat or use of Nuclear Weapons

79
Q

Self-defence in response to attacks by non state actors in the light of recent state practice: a step forward?

A

Raphael Van Steenberghe

80
Q

Jurisdiction is an aspect of sovereingty: it refers to a state’s competence under international law to regulate the conduct of natural and judicial persons.

A

Brownlie

81
Q

Nothing in this Chapter shall authorise the UN to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state

A

Art. 2(7)

82
Q

Jurisdiction to prescribe

A

Power to make law

83
Q

Jurisdiction to adjudicate

A

power to take judicial action

84
Q

Jurisdiction to enforce

A

Power to ensure complience with the law

85
Q
  1. A state cannot exercise jurisdiction outside its territory unless an international treaty or customary law permits it to do so. 2. Within its territory, a state may exercise its jurisdition on any matter. States have a wide discretion.
A

Lotus Case

86
Q

The question weather a certain matter is or is not solely within the jurisdiction of a state is an essentialy relative question

A

Nationality Decrees in Tunis and Marocco

87
Q

Many countries, civil law, claim jurisdiction over the acts of their nationals

A

Re Gutierrez, Public Prosecutor v Antoni

88
Q

Passive personality principle: a state may claim jurisdiction for offences committed abroad which have affected or will affect the nationals of their state.

A

Cutting case, highly criticised in Lotus case

89
Q

It serves no wider goal, lacks aim of repression

A

Donnediu de Varbes

90
Q

Protective princple - states may exercise jurisdiction over alines who have commited an act abroad which is deemed prejudicial to the security of the particular state concerned.

A

Joyce v DPP

91
Q

Brownlie Definition: Universal jurisdiciton amounts to asserting the criminal jurisdiction by a state in the abscence of any other generally recognised head of perspective jurisdiction

A

Browlie

92
Q

Crimes that are percieved as an attack upon the international order

A

Arrest Warrant Case

93
Q

Slavery under universal jurisdiction

A

Lotus case

94
Q

Genocide under universal jurisdiction

A

Jorgic v Germany

95
Q

It comes as something of a surprise that none of the judges in Arrest Warrant explicitly posits a definition of universal jurisdiction, despite the concept’s centrality to the case.In fact, Judge ad hoc Van den Wyngaert suggests, in her dissenting opinion, that ‘[t] here is no generally accepted definition of universal jurisdiction in conventional or customary international law’,

A

Universal Jurisdiction, claryfing the basic concept O’keefe

96
Q

Ascensio observes that universal jurisdiction ‘is usually defined negatively, as a ground of jurisdiction which does not require any link or nexus with the elected forum’.”

A

Universal Jurisdiction, claryfing the basic concept O’keefe

97
Q

Similarly, Reydams states: Negatively defined, [universal jurisdiction] means that there is no link of territoriality or nationality between the State and the conduct or offender, nor is the State seeking to protect itssecurity or credit.

A

Universal Jurisdiction, claryfing the basic concept O’keefe

Public International Law Exam (2 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions