Deck 1 Flashcards
Duty to Reject
A lawyer has a duty to reject representation when doing so would violate a rule of ethics or law, or when a lawyers physical or mental condition materially limits the lawyer’s ability to represent the client.
Good Cause to Reject Court Appointments
1: Likely violation of MRPC
2: Client or Cause is repugnant
3: Unreasonable Financial Burden
Requirements for Selling a Firm
1: Seller Ceases Practice
2: Written Notice to Clients
3: Entire Practice/area sold to one or more lawyers
4: Clients fees may not increase
When may a lawyer share fees with a non-lawyer
1: Fees are paid into a deceased lawyers estate
2: Lawyer who purchases the practice of a dead, disabled or disappeared lawyer can pay to that lawyers estate an agreed upon price
3: Fees shared with law firm personnel via a comp or retirement plan
4: Lawyer shares a court awarded fee with a non-profit
Scope, Objective and Means- Decisions made by lawyer
1: Procedural tactics
2: Limiting scope under reasonable circumstances with client consent.
Decisions made by client
1: Objectives and Goals
2: Scope (lawyer and client can negotiate)
3: Advanced authorization
4: Acceptance of Settlement
5: Taking an Appeal
6: Criminal Testimony
7: Criminal Jury trial
8: Criminal Plea Bargains
Decisions of a Disabled CLient
1: Protective action- a lawyer msut take reasonably necessary protective action.
2: Revealing confidential information in seeking a guardian
3: Emergency Legal Assistance- a lawyer may take legal action on behalf of a disabled person in emergency circumstances where they are acting in good faith.
Client engaging in crimes or fraud
The lawyer is obligated to avoid assisting in crimes or fraud, if the course of action is ongoing, the lawyer must withdraw.
Apparent Authority of a Lawyer
By retaining a lawyer, the client implies that the lawyer is authorized to act for the client in matters relating to the representation that are reasonably appropriate.
Mandatory withdrawal
1: Resulting in a violation
2: Lawyers health impairs representation
3: DIscharge
Permissive WIthdrawal
1: For any reason if no harm done to client
2: Client persists in criminal or fraudulent activity involving the lawyers services
3: Previous services used to perpetrate a crime
4: Repugnant
5: CLient fails to fulfill an obligation (pays) and has received notice
7: Unreasonable financial burden
8: CLient makes representation unreasonably difficult
9: other good cause.
Duties upon termination
The lawyer must take al reasonable steps to mitigate consequences, such as providing notice, allowing time for alternative counsel, surrendering property to which the client is entitled, and refunding advance payments.
Reasonable Fees Factors
1: Difficulty of the case
2: Preclusion of other employment
3: Nature of relationship and fee agreement
4: Lawyers expertise
5: AMount at issue and results obtained
6: Fees charged in locality
Contingent fees general requirements
1: Must be in writing and reasonable
2: Not for criminal cases
3: Not for domestic relations cases
Contingent fees writing requirements
1: Signature of client
2: Calculation methodology
3: Details of expense deduction
Practicing Outside of Admitted Jurisidction
1: IN association with local lawyer
2: Pro Hac Vice
3: Mediation and Arbitration
4: Temporary practice arisign from practice in an admitted jurisdiction
Splitting Fees: lawyer from a different firm
1: Proportionate fees or joint responsibility
2: Clients written consent
3: Fees are Reasonable
Modifying a Fee
Must be reasonable at the time of modification and agreed to by the client.
Retention of Disputed Fees
A lawyer may retain the disputed amount in a trust account. Undisputed fees must be given to client.
Attorney Client Privilege Elements
1: Confidential
2: Communication for the purpose of providing or obtaining legal advice or representation.
3: CLient holds the privilege- only they can waive
4: Indefinite duration.
Exceptions to Attorney Client Privilege
1: Communications made to aid or enable a crime or fraud
2: Communications relevant to a dispute between a lawyer and client
3: Communications relevant to a dispute between parties who claim through the same decedent.
4: Communications between former co-clients now adverse.
Work Product Doctrine
Protects documents prepared by a party’s attorney in anticipation of litigation.
Discovering Work Product
1: requesting party shows substantial need
2: requesting party cannot obtain the information by any other means without undue hardship.
*Mental impressions, conclusions, and trial tactics are always protected
Confidentiality- genearl rule
A lawyer is prohibited from disclosing related to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized, or a specific exception applies
Prohibition of Disclosure of Easily identifiable information
A lawyers use of a hypo is permissible so long as there is no reasonable likelihood that the listener will be able to ascertain the identity of the client or situation involved.
Prospective Client
A person who consults with a lawyer about the possibility of forming a client-lawyer relationship.
Duty of Confidentiality to Prospective Clients
A lawyer who has learned informaitno from a prospective client is not permitted to reveal that information except as permitted by rules with regard to a former client.
Acting to Preserve confidentiality
A lawyer must make reasonable efforts to prevent the disclosure of information relating to a client.
Factors Measuring Reasonableness of Preservation
1: Sensitivity of information
2: likeihood of disclosure if additional safeguards are not employed.
3: the cost and difficulty of utilizing additional safeguards.
4: extent to which the safeguards would adversely affect lawyers representation.
Client AUthorized Disclosure of COnfidential informaiton
1: informed consent
2: impled authority as necessary to carry out representation
3: Within a firm
Exceptions to confidentiality
1: Reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm
2: Substantial Financial Harm to Another based on clients’ fraud or crime
3: Securing Legal advice about lawyers’ compliance with model rules
4: Controversy between lawyer and client
5: Compliance with court order (lawyer should assert all non-frivolous defenses)
6: Detecting Conflicts of Interest
7: DIsclosure to avoid assisting in a crime
Personal Conflicts of interest classifications
1: Familial relation to opposing counsel (not mputed)
2: Sex (not imputed)
Personal Conflicts of interests general rule
A lawyer may not represent a client if the representation may be materially limited by lawyers own interests unless: (1) lawyer reasonably believes he/she will be able to provide competent and diligent representation; (2) representation is not prohibited by law; and (3) informed written consent.
Lawyers as Witnesses
Lawyers are generally barred from representing clients where they are likely to be a necessary witness.
When may a lawyer be a witness?
1: Testimony relates to an uncontested issue
2: testimony relates to the nature and value of legal services
3: DQ would create substantial hardship on client
Financial Assistance to clients
Genearlly not allowed except:
1) advancement of litigation costs (including repayment made contingent on outcome)
2) advancing court costs to indigent clients
Business K’s with a Client
1: Terms must be fair and reasonable to client
2: Client must be advised in writing to seek independent counsel
3: Client consents in writing to full terms
4: Standard commercial transactions that client offers accepted
Limitations on Malpractice Recovery
A lawyer is prohibited from prospectively limiting malpractice liability unless the client is represented by an independent lawyer (submissions to arbitration OK)
Conflict of Interests Among Clients
A lawyer must not represent a client if doing so involves a concurrent conflict
Concurrent Conflicts of Interests
1: Representation of one client would be directly adverse to the interests of another
2: Significant risk that the representation of the client will be materially limited by the lawyers personal interests or responsibilities to another client, former client, or a third person.
Bypassing a Concurrent Conflict
1: The lawyer reasonably believes that they will be able to provide a competent and diligent representation of each client.
2: Representation is not prohibited by law
3: representation does not involve a direct conflict in the same litigation or proceeding
4: each affected client gives informed consent in writing.
Directly Adverse Clients
In no case may a lawyer represent opposing parties in a lawsuit. Absent informed written consent, a lawyer may not act as an advocate in on matter against a person the lawyer represents in another capacity even if the matters are unrelated.
Conflicts in Transactional matters
If a lawyer represents a potential buyer of a business, the lawyer may not represent the seller against the buyer in an unrelated matter without the informed consent of both parties in writing.
Conflicts between current and former clients
A lawyer who has previously represented a client must not subsequently represent a different person in the same or substantially related matter in which that person’s interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client absent informed written consent.
When are matters “substantially related.”
tehy involve the same transaction or legal dispute, or if there is a substantial risk that confidential factual information would materially advance the clients position in the subsequent matter.
Information obtained in former representation
A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter or whose present or former firm has formerly rep’d a client in a matter is not permitted to reveal information relating to the representation to the disadvantage of the former client, except where waived by the former client, the info has become generally known, or the rules require.
Switching firms: Limits on Lawyer
A lawyer is not permitted to knowingly represent a person in the same or substantially related matter in which a firm with which the lawyer has former associated had previously represented a client whose interests are materially adverse to that person and about whom the lawyer had acquired confidential information absen informed written consent.