Deception Flashcards

1
Q

Dishonestly Taking a Document
(Act & Section)

A

Section 228(1)(a), Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Dishonestly Taking a Document
228(1)(a)
(elements)

A
  • Everyone
  • With intent to obtain any property, service, pecuniary advantage, or valuable consideration
  • Dishonestly
  • Without claim of right
  • Takes or obtains
  • Any document
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dishonestly Using a Document
(Act & Section)

A

Section 228(1)(b), Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dishonestly Using a Document
228(1)(b)
(Elements)

A
  • Everyone
  • With intent to obtain any property, service, pecuniary advantage, or valuable consideration
  • Dishonestly
  • Without claim of right
  • Uses or attempts to use
  • Any document
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dishonestly Taking or Using a Document
(Penalty)

A

7 years imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Obtain
(define)

A

obtain, in relation to any person, means to obtain or retain for himself or herself or for any other person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Property
(define)

A

Property includes any real or personal property, and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, money, electricity, and any debt, and anything in action, and any other right or interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Service
(define)

A

R v Cara
“Service is limited to financial or economic value and Excludes privileges or benifits”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pecuniary Advantage
(Case Law)

A

Hayes v R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hayes v R held
(pecuniary advantage)

A

A pecuniary advantage is “anything that enhances the accused’s financial position. It is that enhancement which constitutes the element of advantage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Valuable consideration
(define)

A

Hayes v R
“anything capable of being valuable consideration, whether of a monetary kind or of any other kind; in short, money or money’s worth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Valuable consideration
(examples)

A
  • monetary payment in return for goods or services
  • goods given in return for services provided
  • issuing a false invoice to receive payment for goods never supplied.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dishonestly
(define)

A

Dishonestly, in relation to an act or ommission, means done or omitted without a belief that there was express or implied consent to, or authority for, the act or omission from a person entitled to give such consent or authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Dishonestly
(case law)

A

Hayes v R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hayes v R held
(dishonestly belief)

A

The question is whether the belief is actually held, not whether that belief is reasonable. However, reasonableness may be relevant as evidence on the issue of whether the belief was actually held.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

claim of right
(define)

A

claim of right, in relation to any act, means a belief in a proprietary or possessory right in property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Nature of belief in claim of right
(4 points)

A

First - must be a belief in a proprietary or possessory right in property.

Second - belief must be for the property in relation to the alleged offence

Third - the belief must be held at the time the alleged offence was committed.

Fourth - the belief must be actually held by the defendant. Does not need to be reasonable, and can be a mistake or ignorance. The reasonableness will influence the credibility of the belief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Take
(define)

A

For tangible property, theft is committed by a taking when the offender moves the property or causes it to be moved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Document
(define)

A

document means a document, or part of a document, in any form; and includes without limitation, -
(a), (b), (c), (d), (e)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Document (a)
(define)

A

any paper or other material used for writing or printing that is marked with matter capable of being read

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Document (b)
(define)

A

(b) any Bhotograph, or any photographic negative, plate, slide, film, or microfilm, or any photostatic negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Document (c)
(define)

A

(c) any disC, tape, wire, sound track, card, or other material or device in or on which information, sound or other data are recorded, stored (whether temporarily or permanently), or embodied so as to be capable, with or without the aid of some other equipment, of being reproduced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Document (d)
(define)

A

(d) any material by means of which information is supplied, whether directly or by means of any equipment, to any device used for recording or storing or processing information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Document (e)
(define)

A

(e) any material derived, whether directly or by means of any equipment, from information recorded or stored or processed by any device used for recording or storing or processing information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Document (case law)
R v Misic
26
**R v Misic** held
"Essentially a document is a thing which provides - evidence or - information or - serves as a record."
27
Uses or attempts to use (case law)
Hayes v R
28
**R v Hayes** held (use/attempted use)
"An unsuccessful use of a document is as much a use as a successful one. An unsuccessful use must not be equated conceptually with an attempted one. The concept of attempt relates to use not to the ultimate obtaining of a pecuniary advantage, which is not a necessary element of the offence. Because the use does not have to be successful it may be difficult to draw a clear line between use and attempted use.
29
Definition of Attempts (1)
- Everyone who, - Having an intent to commit an offence, - does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his object - is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence - whether in the circumstances it was possible to commit the offence or not
30
Definition of Attempts (2)
The question **whether an act** done or omitted with intent to commit an offence **is or is not only preparation** for the commission of that offence, and too remote to constitute an attempt to commit it, **is a question of law**
31
Definition of Attempts (3)
**An act** done or omitted **with intent** to commit an offence may constitute an attempt **if it is done immediately or proximately connected** with the intended offence, **whether or not** there was any act unequivocally **showing the intent** to commit that offence.
32
**Obtaining Property by Deception** (Act & Section)
Section 240(1)(a), Crimes Act 1961
33
**Obtaining Property by Deception** (elements)
- Everyone who - by any deception - without claim of right - obtains ownership **or** possession of **or** control over - any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, valuable consideration - directly **or** indirectly
34
**Obtaining Credit by Deception** (Act & Section)
Section 240(1)(b), Crimes Act 1961
35
**Obtaining Credit by Deception** (elements)
- Everyone who - by any deception - without claim of right - in incurring any debt or liability - obtains credit
36
Obtaining by Deception **Altering documents** (Act & Section)
Section 240(1)(c), Crimes Act 1961
37
Obtain by deception **Altering documents** (elements)
- Everyone who - by any deception - without claim of right - induces **or** causes any other person to Deliver over, execute, make, accept, endorse, destroy, or alter - any document **or** thing capable of being used to derive a pecuniary advantage
38
**Causing Loss by Deception** (Act & Section)
Section 240(1)(d), Crimes Act 1961
39
**Causing Loss by Deception** (elements)
- Everyone who - by any deception - without claim of right - causes loss to any other person
40
**Deception** (define) *(3 parts a b & c)*
*Section 240(2)* Deception means- (a) a false representation, whether oral, documentary, or by conduct, where the person making the representation intends to deceive any other person and - (i) knows that it is false in a material particular; or (ii) is reckless as to whether it is false in a material particular; or (b) an omission to disclose a material particular, with intent to deceive any person, in circumstances where there is a duty to disclose it; or (c) a fraudulent device trick or stratagem used with intent to deceive any person.
41
Representation (define)
Not defined, but *Semester & Brookbanks* suggest "it must be capable of being false so it must contain a proposition of fact"
42
False representation (important points)
- must be false in a material particular - defendant must know it is false in a material particular **or** - be reckless whether it is false - wilful blindness will suffice
43
Must proves for deception (4 parts)
- that there was an intent to deceive - that there was a representation by the defendant - that the representation was false; and - that the defendant either: knew it to be False in a material particular **OR** was reckless whether it was false in a material particular
44
Intent to deceive (case law)
R v Morely
45
**R v Morely** held (Intent to deceive)
An intention to deceive requires that the deception is practised in order to deceive the affected party. Purposeful intent is necessary and must exist at the time of the deception.
46
Recklessness (case law)
Cameron v R
47
**Cameron v R** held
Recklessness is established if: (a) the defendant recognized that there was a real possibility that: (i) his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result and/or (ii) that the proscribed circumstances existed; and (b) having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable
48
Intent (define)
- A deliberate act, and - Intent to Produce a Specific Result
49
Deception Examples *Orally*
Verbally claiming to own goods that are in fact subject to a hire purchase agreement. Or *R v Caslin* the false prostitute.
50
Deception Examples *by conduct*
Representing oneself to be a collector for charity by appearing to be carrying an official collection bag. Or *R v Barnard* the fake student in cap and gown.
51
Deception Examples *Documentary*
Presenting a false certificate of qualification, or completing valueless cheques.
52
A representation by the defendant (case law)
R v Morely
53
**R v Morely** held (representation)
Representations must relate to a statement of existing fact, rather than a statement or future intention.
54
Silence as a representation
As a general rule silence or non-disclosure will not be regarded as a representation. The exception is label swapping, where you don't tell a shop keeper the price is wrong. *Police v Dronjak* - 2 labels and knew the wrong price *Rao v Police* - actively swapped the price tags.
55
Knowledge established (4 ways)
Knowledge can be established by: - an admission - implication from the circumstances surrounding the event - propensity evidence - wilful blindness (R v Crooks)
56
Material Particular (define)
"A matter will be a 'material particular' if it is something important or something that matters." *R v Mallett*
57
**device** (define)
A 'plan, scheme or trick'
58
**Trick** (define)
An action or scheme undertaken to fool, outwit, or deceive.
59
**Stratagem** (define)
A cunning plan or scheme especially for deceiving an enemy, or trickery.
60
"Privilege" or "benifit" (examples)
- Using another person's gym membership card so that you can use the gym facilities - Access to medical services - The withdrawal of an assault charge - A reduction in sentence for an offence If benifit or privilege does not involve money, no need for loss or injury to the person defrauded
61
Ownership (define)
Ownership is synonymous with the concept of title
62
Possession (case law)
R v Cox
63
R v Cox held (possession)
Possession involves two elements. The first, the physical element, is actual or potential physical custody or control. The second, the mental element is a combination of knowledge and intention: knowledge in the sense of an awareness by the accused that the substance is in his possession and an intention to exercise possession.
64
Control of property, must prove?
- it must be proved that the defendant did in fact exercise some control over the particular property
65
Control (define)
To "control" something means to exercise authorative or dominating influence or command over it.
66
Pecuniary advantage (examples)
- cash from stolen goods - clothing or cash obtained by a credit or EFTPOS card - A discount (by using a student ID) - avoiding or deferring a payment of a debt *R v Dakers,*- same TAB ticket twice, still a use, just an unsuccessful one.
67
Debt or liability incurred must be....
... legally enforceable
68
Debt (define)
'Debt' means money owing from one person to another
69
Liability (define)
'Liability' means a legally enforceable financial obligation to pay, such as the cost of a meal (succulent Chinese meal)
70
Fisher v Raven held
Credit refers to the obligation on the debtor to pay or repay, and the time given for them to do so by the creditor. Credit does not extend to an obligation to supply services or goods.
71
Credit (case law)
Fisher v Raven
72
Credit obtained, (examples)
- Obtaining money on loan - extending existing overdraft facilities - renting or leasing a dwelling
73
Timing of intent to deceive (case law)
R v McKay
74
R v McKay held
That the credit had been obtained on booking in but at that time the accused did not possess an intent to deceive
75
Continuing representation
In many cases a representation, whether by words or conduct, may be of a continuing effect.... If during the course of a meal a diner decides to avoid payment, the continuing representation of an intention to pay will become false and any subsequent obtaining of food is s240
76
Induces (define)
"To persuade, bring about or give rise to" *(very wide scope)*
77
Proof of inducement in deception (must prove) - (2 points)
- that the false representation was believed, and - that it was the consequence of that belief that the victim parted with his or her money (direct evidence from victim is best, but in some cases circumstantial will suffice)
78
Inducement (case law)
R v Laverty
79
R v Laverty held
It is necessary for the prosecution to prove that the person parting with the property was induced to do so by the false representation made. (otherwise only an attempt)
80
Deliver over (define)
To **deliver over**, is to surrender up someone or something
81
Execute (define)
To **execute**, is to put a course of action into effect.
82
Endorse (define)
To **endorse**, is to write or sign on a document
83
Alter (define)
To **alter**, is to change in character or composition, typically in a comparatively small but significant way
84
Accept (define)
To **accept**, is to receive something.
85
Person (define)
Person, owner, and other words and expressions of the like kind, include - the Crown and - any public body or local authority, and - any board, society, or company, and - any other body of persons, whether incorporated or not, and - the inhabitants of the district of any local authority, in relation to such acts and things as it or they are capable of doing or owning
86
s240(1)(d) - must prove (3 points)
- the loss was caused by deception - it was reasonably foreseeable some more than trivial loss would occur, **but** - need not prove the loss was intentionally caused
87
Deception Offences (penalties)
Over $1000 - 7 years $500 - $1000 - 1 year Under $500 - 3 months
88
**Propensity Rule** Section 40, Evidence Act 2006 Subsection (1)(a) *definition*
(1)(a) Means evidence that tends to show a person's propensity to act in a particular way or to have a particular state of mind, being evidence of acts, omissions, events, or circumstances with which a person is alleged to have been involved.
89
**Propensity Rule** Section 40, Evidence Act 2006 Subsection (1)(b) *exception*
(b) does not include evidence of an act or omission that is--- (i) 1 of the elements of the offence for which the person is being tried; or (ii) the cause of action in the proceedings in question
90
**Propensity Rule** Section 40, Evidence Act 2006 Subsection (2) *who*
(2) A party may offer propensity evidence in a **civil or criminal** proceeding about **any person**
91
**Propensity Rule** Section 40, Evidence Act 2006 Subsection (3) *restrictions*
(3)(a) In criminal proceeding, in accordance with 41, or 42, or 43. (b) For sexual assault complainant, only in accordance with 44.
92
**Propensity Rule** Section 40, Evidence Act 2006 Subsection (4) *veracity*
(4) Evidence solely or mainly relevant to veracity not applicable
93
**Propensity Offered by prosecution** Section 43, Evidence Act 2006 Subsection (1) *balancing*
Only if the probative value outweighs the risk of unfair prejudicial effect.
94
**Propensity Offered by prosecution** Section 43, Evidence Act 2006 Subsection (3) *what a judge may consider*
(a) the **frequency** of the acts (b) the **connection in time** between the propensity acts and the charge acts (c) the **extent of the similarity** between the two (d) **number of people** making similar allegations (e) whether (d) is because of **collusion or suggestibilty**. (f) the extent that the circumstances are **unusual**
95
**Propensity Offered by prosecution** Section 43, Evidence Act 2006 Subsection (4) *what the judge MUST consider*
(a) whether the evidence is likely to unfairly predispose the fact-finder against the defendant (b) whether the fact-finder will tend to give disproportionate weight in reaching a verdict to evidence of other acts or omissions
96
**Title** (define)
"a right or claim to the ownership of property"
97
Section 149, Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 *sale by person who is not owner*
Applies if - not the owner - not sold with authority or consent of owner (2) The buyer acquires **no better title** to the goods than the seller had, unless the owner of the goods is by the owner's conduct preclude from denying the seller's authority to sell.
98
Section 149, Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 *sale under voidable title*
Applies if - seller had voidable title - seller's title not yet voided (2) The buyer acquires a good title to the goods if the buyer buys the goods in good faith and without notice of the seller's deficit in title
99
Section 246(4), Crimes Act 1961
IF: (a) any property stolen or obtained by any other imprisonable offence has been returned to the owner, **or** (b) legal title to any such property has been acquired by any person-- **a subsequent receiving of it is not an offence, even though the receiver may know that the property had previously been stolen or obtained by any imprisonable offence.**
100
Theft by person in special relationship (Act & Section)
Section 220, Crimes Act 1961
101
Section 220 applies to....?
(1) This section applies to any person who has received or is in possession of, or has control over, any property on terms or in circumstances that the person knows require the person-- (a) to account to any other person for the property, or for any proceeds arising from the property; or (b) to deal with the property, or any proceeds arising from the property, in accordance with the requirements of any other person
102
Section 220 Everyone to whom (1) applies commits theft who.....
who **intentionally** *fails to account* to the other person as so required or **intentionally** deals with the property, or any proceeds of the property, *otherwise than in accordance* with those requirements.
103
Section 220 This section applies whether or not....
... the person was required to deliver over the identical property received or in the person's possession or control.
104
Section 220 For the purposes of subsection (1), it is a question of ___? ___ whether the circumstances required any person to account or to act in accordance with any requirements
LAW
105
Two core elements of s220
(a) **KNOWLEDGE** they received the property with conditions on how they can deal with it or the proceeds, based on another's requirements. (b) **INTENT** to depart from their obligation.
106
**Forgery** (Act & Section)
Section 256, Crimes Act 1961
107
**Forgery** *Section 256(1)* (Elements)
- Everyone who - makes a false document - with intention of using it - to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration.
108
**Forgery** *Section 256(1)* (penalty)
10 years imprisonment
109
**Forgery** *Section 256(2)* (Elements)
- Everyone who - makes a false document - knowing it to be false - with intent that it be used or acted upon as genuine - whether in NZ or elsewhere
110
**Forgery** *Section 256(2)* (penalty)
3 years imprisonment
111
**Forgery** When is forgery complete?
as soon as the document is made with- - the intent described in (1) or - the knowledge and intent described in (2) AND even if the false document is incomplete if it is made so as to indicate it was to be acted upon as genuine.
112
False document means a document-- (define)
(a) of which the whole or any material part is purported to be made by any person who did not make it, or by a ficticious person. (b) of which the whole or any material part purports to be made by or on behalf of any person who did not authorize its making, or on behalf of a ficticious person; or (c) of which the whole or any material part has been has been altered, whether by addition, insertion, deletion, obliteration, erasure, removal, or otherwise, and that purports to have been altered by or on behalf of a person who did not alter it or authorize its alteration, or by or in behalf of a ficticious person; or (d) that is in whole or in part, a reproduction of any other document, and that purports to have been made by or on behalf of a person who did not make it or authorize its making, or by or on behalf of a ficticious person; or (e) that is made in the name of a person, either by that person or by that person's authority, with the intention that is should pass as being made by some other person who did not make it, or by a ficticious person. (eg. a 'newly discovered' painting by Van Gogh)
113
Material alterations (6 ways)
- additions - insertions - deletions - obliterations - erasures - removal of material or otherwise
114
Material Alteration (define)
An alteration is a material Alteration if it increases the value or negotiability of a document or instrument. A false document can be made by making material alterations to a genuine document.
115
Specified Intent for Forgery
Intent:- - To use the false document to obtain, or - That the false document be used or acted on as genuine *(Intent to deceive, though not an essential element, an intent to deceive by means of that which is false must be proved)*
116
Examples of forgery
- writing an exam paper in the name of another person who is required to sit the exam - pre-dating a deed to give priority over another - Forging letters of recommendation for inclusion in a CV that are necessary to obtain a position - Falsely completing a statement of service on a witness summons.
117
Using Forged Documents (Act & Section)
Section 257(1), Crimes Act 1961
118
Using Forged Documents (elements)
- Everyone who - knowing a docuemt to be forged - (a) uses the document to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration; or (b) uses, deals with, or acts upon the document as if it were genuine; or (c) causes any other person to use, deal with, or act upon it as if it were genuine.
119
Altering, concealing, destroying, or reproducing documents with intent to deceive (Act & Section)
Section 258, Crimes Act 1961
120
Altering, concealing, destroying, or reproducing documents with intent to deceive (elements)
- Everyone who - with intent to obtain by deception - any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration, **or** cause loss to any other person - (a) alters, conceals, or destroys any document, or causes any document to be altered, concealed, or destroyed **or** - (b) makes or causes to be made a document that is in whole or in part a reproduction of any other document.
121
Using altered or reproduced document with intent to deceive (Act & Section)
Section 259, Crimes Act 1961
122
Using altered or reproduced document with intent to deceive (Elements)
- Everyone who - knowing any document to have been made with intent to obtain by deception - with intent to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration **or** cause loss to any other person - uses or deals with or acts upon the document **or** causes any person to use or deal with, or act upon, the document.
123
Altering, concealing, destroying, or reproducing documents with intent to deceive/Using altered or reproduced document with intent to deceive (penalties)
10 years imprisonment
124
Computer Crime to **access** (define)
**access**, in relation to any computer system, means instruct, communicate with, store data in, receive data from, or otherwise make use of any of the resources of the computer system
125
Computer Crime **authorisation** (define)
**authorisation** includes an authorisation conferred on a person by or under an enactment or a rule of law, or by an order of a court or judicial process
126
Computer Crime **computer system** (define)
(a) means---- (i) a computer; or (ii) 2 or more interconnected computers; or (iii) any communication link between computers or to remote terminals or another device; or (iv) 2 or more interconnected computers combined with any communication links between computers or to remote terminals or any other device; and (b) any part or (a) and all related input, output, processing, storage, software, or communication facilities, and stored data.
127
Accessing a computer system for dishonest purpose (Act & Section)
Section 249(1)/(2), Crimes Act 1961
128
Accessing a computer system for dishonest purpose Section 249(1) (Elements)
-Everyone who - directly or indirectly - accesses any computer system and *thereby* - dishonestly or by deception and - without claim of right - (a) obtains any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration **or** - (b) cause loss to any other person
129
Accessing a computer system for dishonest purpose Section 249(2) (Elements)
-Everyone who - directly or indirectly - accessed any computer system *with intent to* - dishonestly or by deception - without claim of right - (a) to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration **or** - (b) to cause loss to any other person
130
Damaging or interfering with a Computer System *danger to life* (Act & Section)
Section 250(1), Crimes Act 1961
131
Damaging or interfering with a Computer System *danger to life* (elements)
- Everyone who - intentionally or recklessly - destroys, damages, or alters any computer system - if he or she knows or ought to know danger to life is likely to result
132
Damaging or interfering with a Computer System *without authority* (Act & Section)
Section 250(2), Crimes Act 1961
133
Damaging or interfering with a Computer System *without authority* (elements)
- Everyone who - intentionally or recklessly - without authorisation - knowing that he or she is not authorized, **or** being reckless as to whether or not her or she is authorized - damages, deletes, modifies, or otherwise interferes with or impares any data **or** - causes any data or software in any computer system to be damaged, deleted, modified, or otherwise interfered with or impared **or** - causes any computer system to fail **or** deny service to any authorized users.
134
Accessing computer system without authorisation (Act & Section)
Section 252, Crimes Act 1961
135
Accessing computer system without authorisation (elements)
- Everyone who - directly or indirectly - intentionally accesses any computer system - without authorisation - knowing that he or she is not authorized to access that computer system **or** being reckless as to whether or not he or she is authorised to access that computer system
136
Computer Crime penalties
Damaging (danger to life) - 10 years Damaging (unauthorized) - 7 years Accessing dishonestly (success) - 7 years Accessing dishonestly (intended) - 5 years Accessing w/o authorisation - 2 years
137
**Acccess requires...**
Access requires that the person instructing or communicating with the computer system has some form or connection with the computer system through which instructions or communications may pass.