Debt Policy 2 Flashcards
Financial leverage impacts the performance of the firm by:
Increasing the volatility of the firm’s net income.
The reason that MM Proposition I does not hold in the presence of corporate taxation is because:
Levered firms pay less taxes compared with identical unlevered firms.
A firm should select the capital structure which:
Maximizes the value of the firm
Bryan invested in company when the firm was financed solely with equity. The firm is now utilizing debt in its capital structure. To un-lever his position, Bryan needs to:
Sell some shares of Bryco stock and loan it out such that he created debt-equity ratio equal to that of the firm.
The proposition that the value of a levered firm is equal to the value of an unlevered firm is known as:
MM Proposition I with no tax
The concept of homemade leverage is most associated with:
MM Proposition I with no tax
The following statements are correct in relation to MM Proposition II with no tax:
- The required return on assets is equal to the weighted average cost of capital
- Financial risk is determined by the debt-equity ratio
MM Proposition 1 with taxes is based on the concept that:
The value of the firm increases as total debt increases because of the interest tax shield
MM Proposition 2 with taxes:
Has the same general implications as MM proposition 2 without taxes.
The interest-tax shield has no value for a firm when:
- Tax rate is equal to 0
- The firm is unlevered
- A firm elects 100% equity as its capital structure
The interest tax shield is a key reason why:
- The next cost of debt to a firm is generally less than the cost of equity
Given a progressive tax rate structure, the following will tend to diminish the benefit of the interest tax shield:
- A reduction in tax rates
- A large tax loss carry forward
- A large depreciation tax deduction
In a world with taxes and financial distress, when a firm is operating with the optimal capital structure:
- The Debt-Equity ratio will also be optimal
- The weighted average cost of capital will be at its minimal point
- The increased benefit from additional debt is equal to the increased bankruptcy costs of that debt.
The MM Theory with taxes implies that firms should issue maximum debt. In practice, this is not true because:
Bankruptcy is a disadvantage to debt.
Given realistic estimates of the probability and costs of bankruptcy, the future costs of a possibly bankruptcy are borne by:
Shareholders because debt holders will pay less for the debt providing less cash for the shareholders.