DEA problems and limitations Flashcards
The efficiency of a given DMU depends, therefore, on:
the inputs and outputs that have been included in the model.
the more inputs and outputs are included in the model, the more:
data is needed to obtain reliable results; see Pedraja et al (1999).
DEA problems:
extreme values of inputs or outputs and the choice of variables for the model.
The DEA problem of extreme values of inputs or outputs ( the lowest value of an input and the highest value of an output) could result in:
DMUs that become 100% efficient.
The DEA problem of “the more inputs and outputs are included in the model”, could result in:
the more units will be efficient. Taking a metaphor from a different context, we would find that the “naughty boy” who puts the least effort in the class and gains low marks would be efficient under a DEA model that includes amount of effort as an input.
If too many inputs and outputs are included:
some of them may be highly correlated and, therefore, redundant.
The DEA problem of “removing inputs or outputs from a model”:
will decrease efficiency estimates, which will, at best remain constant. This decrease would affect some DMUs more than others.
The same characteristics that make DEA a powerful tool can also create problems. An analyst
should keep these limitations in mind when choosing whether or not to use DEA.
- Since DEA is an extreme point technique, noise (even symmetrical noise with zero mean) such as measurement error can cause signicant problems.
- DEA is good at estimating “relative” efficiency of a DMU but it converges very slowly to
“absolute” efficiency. In other words, it can tell you how well you are doing compared to your
peers but not compared to a “theoretical maximum.” - Since DEA is a nonparametric technique, statistical hypothesis tests are dicult and are the
focus of ongoing research. - Since a standard formulation of DEA creates a separate linear program for each DMU, large
problems can be computationally intensive.