DCF Flashcards
Walk me thru a DCF
a DCF values a company based on the present value of all future cash flows
- project FCF for the next 5 to 10 yrs, making assumptions to rev growth, margins, NWC, and CapEx
- discount cash flows using WACC
- estimate TV using multiples method or Gordon Growth
- PV + TV = EV
- convert EV to EQV so we can find implied share price
- Conduct a sensitivity analysis to get a valuation range
Which would have a larger impact on FCF? $10 more of rev or $10 less of SG&A?
$10 less of SG&A, because when rev increases, COGS also increases
When would you use the Gordon Growth model?
Usually, we use both ways of TV to check out assumptions
but in these scenarios, we can only use the Gordon growth model:
1. the company is too big to be sold
2. company is mature and growing at a predictable rate
Compare the impact on valuation:
- $10 decrease in CapEx
- $10 decrease in SG&A
- $10 increase in rev
decrease in CapEx > decrease in opex > increase in rev
Decrease in CapEx increases FCF by 10
Decrease in opex will get taxed
Increase in rev will lead to increase in COGS
22How do you find an appropriate terminal value with the Exit Mult method?
reference:
- the company’s current multiple
- public comparables
- industry mean multiples
we can conduct sensitivity analysis in the end
If a company’s TV makes up 90% of its valuation, what do you think about this?
Usually TV makes up 70% of EV
This is concerning, because we’re basing the valuation on something that’s far away in the future
Double check assumptions with Exit Multiples and Gordon Growth method
Walk me from Revenue to U FCF
- COGS
- Opex (SG&A, D&A)
= EBIT - (1-t) = NOPAT
+ D&A
-Capex - increase in NWC
= U FCF
Walk me from U FCF to L FCF
U FCF - (interest, tax deducted) - mandatory debt principal repayments = L FCF
What’s the difference between U FCF and L FCF?
Unlevered free cash flow belongs to all investors. We discount this by WACC to find EV
L FCF only belongs to equity investors. We discount this by cost of E to find EQV
What are the differences between UFCF and CFO?
CFO is levered, belongs to equity investors only
- nonrecurring items are added back in CFO, but not UFCF
Which is typically higher: EBIT or UFCF? Why?
Depends
Subtractions:
- Capex
- increases in NWC
- taxes
Addbacks:
- D&A
A DCF was conducted. It is determined the company is worth $500. However, it turns out that Capex was understated by $50 in year 2, what’s the true value of the company, assuming 10% WACC?
PV = 50/ (1+10%)^2 = 41
true value = 500-41
How does increasing the tax rate impact valuation?
- higher income tax expenses reduces FCF
- the tax shield of debt increases, so less interest payments
- levered b decreases, which decreases cost of E, which decreases WACC
When wold it be approrpiate to use a levered DCF?
in an LBO situation, where interest and debt principal payments are significant
then we can tell how much FCF is actually attributable to investors over the holding period
Why do you typically use unlevered DCF rather than levered?
- for convenience, because you have to project interest expense and mandatory debt repayments
- levered DCF can produce odd results, because debt principal payments can spike cash flow down
Does a DCF ever make sense for a company with negative cash flows?
Yes, the company could be growing, which means it’ll make positive cash flow in the future.
If the company has no plausible path to positive cash flow, then no
Why would you not want to use a DCF?
- a company has very unpredictable cash flows:
1. early startups
2. cyclical businesses
3. on the verge of bankruptcy - financial institution companies, which are valued on their balance sheets. You would use a dividend discount model
If the company’s capital structure is about to change, how do you reflect it in FCF?
- in an unlevered DCF, it won’t show up explicitly, but WACC will change over time
- in a levered DCF, the debt and interest payments will change
What are the pros and cons of using a DCF?
pros:
- measures intrinsic value, not influenced by market sentiment
- measures EV
cons:
- requires lots of assumptions
- if CF is negative or hard to forecast, the DCF is not feasible
- TV depends on even more assumptions
Walk me through public comps and precedent transactions
- select companies and transactions that are similar
- determine the appropriate multiple
- make a range of multiples
- find your company’s appropriate place within the range
What are the pros and cons of Public Comps?
Pros:
- quick and easy
- reflects market sentiment
- minimal assumptions
Cons:
- can be hard to find
- not exactly comparable
What are pros and cons of Precedent Transactions analysis?
Pros:
- includes the control premium
- minimal assumptions
Cons:
- hard to find
- influenced by market premiums at the time
Why would a company with similar growth and profitability have a higher multiple than similar companies?
- the company has a moat, e.g. patent or IP
- it has greater market share
- there has been a recent event that triggered higher stock prices
a company’s current stock price is 10, it’s P/E multiple is 20x, shares 10M. What is EPS? What happens after a 2-1 stock split?
Market cap: 100M
earnings: 0.5
After the split, price will be 5, earnings 0.25