Damages For Breach Of Contract Flashcards

1
Q

Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth 1998

A

An injured party may claim the cost of rectifying an the defect.

Cost of rectifying pool was excessive so £2,500 awarded for loss of amenity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Anglia TV v Reed 1972

A

Reliance loss may be awarded where it is not possible to show a loss of profit or a reasonable calculation cannot be made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Addis v Gramophone co 1909

A

Old rule damages for mental distress were not recoverable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Jarvis v swan tours 1973

A

Old rule no longer applies where primary purpose of contract was for enjoyment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Watts v Morrow 1991

A

Damages for mental distress could be awarded for physical inconvenience or discomfort caused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Farley v Skinner 2001

A

Recognised that pleasure did not need to be the main or only element of the contract just important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Malik v Bank of Credit & Commerce 1997

A

Damages were recoverable for injury to reputation - claimants job prospects could be adversely affected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hadley v Baxendale 1854

A

Damages are recoverable only when they arise naturally from the breach of contract (normal loss), or are in the contemplation of the parties at the time of contract was made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The Heron II (1967)

A

Loss which a reasonable defendant would imagine was not unlikely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The Achilleas 2008

A

HoL upheld H v B test but stated in certain circumstances it could be departed from in order to give effect to the presumed intentions of the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Beoco v Alfa Laval 1994

A

Causation must be proved - the loss must be caused mainly by the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Dunlop pneumatic tyre v new garage and motor co 1915

A

Penalty clause exists if the sum is extravagant in comparison with the greatest loss, defendant has more to pay if they fail to pay a smaller sum, single lump sum is payable for different breaches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly