Damages and equitable remedies Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Types of remedies

A
  • Common law
    • > damages
  • Equitable remedies
    • > specific performance
    • > injunction
    • > restitution/ quantum meruit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Liquidated damages

A
  • damages that have been pre-agreed to by parties to the contract. No dispute in amount.
  • must be a genuine pre-estimate of loss and not a penalty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Liquidated damages - genuine pre-estimate or penalty????!!@??!@?#?

A

As set out in ๐ƒ๐ฎ๐ง๐ฅ๐จ๐ฉ ๐๐ง๐ž๐ฎ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐œ ๐“๐ฒ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ ๐‚๐จ ๐‹๐ญ๐ ๐ฏ ๐๐ž๐ฐ ๐†๐š๐ซ๐š๐ ๐ž & ๐Œ๐จ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ ๐‚๐จ ๐‹๐ญ๐, If ONE of the GUIDELINE is met, most likely a penalty:

1) if the stipulated sum is extravagant and unconscionable compared with the greatest conceivable loss flowing from the breach, the LDC is a penalty.
2) if the stipulated sum is payable as a lump sum regardless of different possible breaches where some are trivial and some are serious, LDC is a penalty.
3) if the stipulated sum is greater than the sum payable under the contract, LDC is a penalty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Unliquidated damages

A
  • amt not pre-agreed
  • it is to place innocent party in the same position he would be if the contract had been performed properly.

Tree diagram

1) has there been a breach?
- yes (go to 2)
- no (then no la so no damages)

2) has the breach CAUSED loss?
- yes (go to 3)
- no (means no loss no damages la dumb)

3) is loss or injury too REMOTE?
- no (go to 4)
- yes (sad lo no damages BUT if 2nd limb of ๐‡๐š๐๐ฅ๐ž๐ฒ ๐ฏ ๐๐š๐ฑ๐ž๐ง๐๐š๐ฅ๐ž is astisfied then heng ah go to 4)

4) what is the amoune of damages? (ASSESSMENT)
5) did plaintiff take steps to minimise damages? (MITIGATION)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Causation

A
  • Is there a casual connection between the breach and the loss suffered?
    • P must show that the breach of the contract by D was the cause of the loss.
  • โ€œBut-Forโ€ Test: but for the action, the result would not have happened.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Remoteness

A
  • The loss or injury must be reasonably related to the contract.
  • Need only foresee KIND of loss, NOT EXTENT of loss

๐‡๐š๐๐ฅ๐ž๐ฒ ๐ฏ ๐๐š๐ฑ๐ž๐ง๐๐š๐ฅ๐ž -> only two types of losses are recoverable, if the loss doesnt fall into either of these categories, it is too remote.
Limb 1: Loss arising naturally
- Imputed knowledge

Limb 2: Loss arising from special or exceptional circumstances where it can be shown that the loss was within the contemplation of the parties at the time of the contract
- Imputed &/ Actual knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Assessment - expectation loss and reliance loss

A
  • Aim to compensate not to punish

Expectation loss:
what P wouldve expected to get if contract had been performed properly.
eg; loss of profits
- careful to verify if it is calculated on a nett/gross basis.
gross- cant claim reliance loss bc it will be double compensation, so can only choose one to claim.
nett- can claim reliance loss

Reliance loss:
wasted expenditure incurred by P prior to the breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Assessment - cost of cure vs dimunition in value

A

Cost of Cure:
- Damages measured according to the cost of defect
eg; cost of making slanted building straight

Dimunition in value
- Damages measured according to difference in value between what was promised in contract and what was actually done.
eg; couldve sold building at 500k but now that its slanted, can only sell at 300k so 200k is the DiV.

Where CoC is out of proportion to the advantage to be gained by the inured party, the court may award the DiV PLUS modest damages for loss of amenity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Assessment - Non-pecuniary loss

A

Non-pecuniary losses are non-monetary losses such as hurt feelings, anxiety, loss of reputation, etc.
- The general rule is that non-pecuniary losses are generally not recoverable bc of their remoteness.
EXCEPTION:
if one of the sole purposes of the contract was to have a peace of mind, relaxtion, give pleasure OR if P suffers substantial physical inconvenience, the injured party will be awarded damages for the loss of such non-pecuniary loss.
๐‰๐š๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฏ ๐’๐ฐ๐š๐ง ๐“๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ
where a disastrous holiday allowed damages for non-pecuniary losses as peace of mind, relaxation and pleasure was an important objective of the contract.

๐…๐š๐ซ๐ฅ๐ž๐ฒ ๐ฏ ๐’๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ง๐ž๐ซ
where damages for loss of peace of min due to property near airport were granted.

๐˜๐š๐ฉ ๐๐จ๐จ๐ง ๐Š๐ž๐ง๐  ๐’๐จ๐ง๐ง๐ฒ ๐ฏ ๐๐š๐œ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐ˆ๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐๐ญ๐ž ๐‹๐ญ๐
where loss of amenities was claimable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mitigation

A
  • Innocent party has duty to take reasonable steps to reduce loss and not aggravate loss
  • No mitigation means he cannot recover compensation for loss he couldโ€™ve avoided by taking reasonable steps
  • Expenses incurred in mitigating losses are recoverable, even if it results in increased loss too.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Specific performance

A
  • Court orders D to perform his obligations under the contract
  • Specific performance can be, but generally would not be awarded:
    where damages are an adequate remedy;
    where the Court cannot supervise its enforcement;
    contracts involving provision of personal services
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Injunction

A
  • court order forcing a party to the contract to not do something
  • normally cannot be used if it would achieve the same result as specific performance
    ๐–๐š๐ซ๐ง๐ž๐ซ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ˆ๐ง๐œ ๐ฏ ๐๐ž๐ฅ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง
    where an injunction against Nelson to prevent her from acting for another studio would have indirectly amounted to forcing her to work for WB, which is what a specific performance couldโ€™ve achieved. Thus, it was held unenforceable.

Prohibitory injunction: prevent guilty party from performing an action

Mandatory injunction: requires guilty party to undo an action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

๐‡๐š๐๐ฅ๐ž๐ฒ ๐ฏ ๐๐š๐ฑ๐ž๐ง๐๐š๐ฅ๐ž

A

Remoteness of loss
Damages can be recovered if losses fall within one of the 2 limbs:
Limb 1: Loss arising naturally from the course of business.
Limb 2: Unusual losses that are within the reasonable knowledge of the 2 parties before or at the time the contract was made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

๐ƒ๐ฎ๐ง๐ฅ๐จ๐ฉ ๐๐ง๐ž๐ฎ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐œ ๐“๐ฒ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ ๐‚๐จ ๐‹๐ญ๐ ๐ฏ ๐๐ž๐ฐ ๐†๐š๐ซ๐š๐ ๐ž & ๐Œ๐จ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ ๐‚๐จ ๐‹๐ญ๐

A

Liquidated damages
If one of the guidelines is met, it is most likely a penalty:
- Sum is extravagant and unconscionable compared with the greatest conceivable loss flowing from the breach
- Sum is payable as a lump sum regardless of different possible breaches, some of which are serious while others are trivial
- Sum is greater than the sum payable under the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

๐‰๐š๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฏ ๐’๐ฐ๐š๐ง ๐“๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ

A

Assessment - Non-pecuniary losses
where a disastrous holiday allowed damages for non-pecuniary losses were claimable due to pleasure and peace of mind being an important objective of the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

๐…๐š๐ซ๐ฅ๐ž๐ฒ ๐ฏ ๐’๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ง๐ž๐ซ

A

where damages for the peace of mind due to property near the airport was granted despite not being the sole reason for the contract.

17
Q

๐˜๐š๐ฉ ๐๐จ๐จ๐ง ๐Š๐ž๐ง๐  ๐’๐จ๐ง๐ง๐ฒ ๐ฏ ๐๐š๐œ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐ˆ๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐๐ญ๐ž ๐‹๐ญ๐

A

where the loss of amenities is claimable.

18
Q

๐–๐š๐ซ๐ง๐ž๐ซ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ˆ๐ง๐œ ๐ฏ ๐๐ž๐ฅ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง

A

Injunction
where an injunction against Nelson to prevent her from acting for another studio, indirectly amounted to forcing her to work for WB, which would be a specific performance. Thus, it was held unenforceable.