Damages Flashcards

1
Q

Expectation damages

A

objective to put injured party in position he would have been had K not been breached

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Computation of damages-Standard formula

A

Loss in value+other losses-costs avoided-loss avoided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Damage Analysis-types of Ks

A

Real property, Employment K, Construction K, and K for sale of goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Real property-Sellers measure of damages formula

A

K price-MKT price(at breach)-other losses-loss avoided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Real property-Buyer measure of damage formula

A

English rule-Restitution of money paid unless seller’s breach in bad faith. American rule-MKT price(at breach)-K price+other losses-loss avoided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Employment K-Employer able to replace employee formula

A

Cost to replace employee (new salary)+other losses(Incidental/consequential)-cost avoided (unpaid salary)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Employemtn K-Employer not able to replace employee formula

A

FMV of employee’s services+other losses-cost avoided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Employment K-Employee measure of damages formula

A

Unpaid salary+other losses-cost avoided-loss avoided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Construction K-Builder’s measure of damage formula

A

Loss in value+other losses-costs avoided-lost avoided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Construction K-Owner’s measure of damages

A

General: Cost to complete or repair-costs avoided.. (public policy, willful breach) Alternative: Diminution in value (value w/o breach-value w breach). Factors that favor diminution of value: Economic waste. Substantial performance with unintentional deviation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

K for sale of goods-Seller’s damages formula

A

K price-MKT price+incidental $$-expenses saved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

K for sale of goods-Seller’s damages, Alternatives

A
  1. If resale lower than MKT price: K price-resale price+incidental $$-expenses saved
  2. Lost profits-What Seller would have made.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

K for sale of goods-Lost profits categories

A

Lost volume seller-sufficient volume that seller can make profit on sale to B and C. Components seller-specifically manufactured goods for buyer; not readily sold on open Mkt. Jobber-seller intends to buy for resale to B and B breaches before seller buys goods.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

K for sale of goods-Buyer’s damages formula

A

Mkt price (at time B learns of breach) - K price + incidental/consequential $$ - expenses paid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

K for sale of goods-buyer’s damage alternatives

A
  1. Cover price - K price + incidental/consequential $$ - expenses paid.
  2. Specific performance-unique goods.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Doctrines that D can raise to limit the damages

A
  1. Foreseeability 2. Certainty 3. Causation 4. Mitigation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Foreseeability

A

Not liable for damages because they were not foreseeable by D.

18
Q

Foreseeability-Two part test

A
  1. Damage flow naturally from the breach; OR 2. They must have been within the parties contemplation of the K
19
Q

Certainty

A

P cannot prove damages to reasonable degree of certainty

20
Q

Certainty-Two ways it will apply

A
  1. New business-Traditionally unable to prove lost profits to reasonable degree of certainty. Trend-Allow data from comparable established businesses.
  2. Public whim-Lost profits too speculative and uncertain for entertainment, sporting events, etc.
21
Q

Causation

A

Breach must be proximate cause of injured party’s losses/damages. Damages limited to losses incurred before event.

22
Q

Employee’s loss avoided and Mitigation to employment

A

Other jobs during k term unless possible absent breach. Other jobs employee could have held if employer shows; comparable and as or more convenient, employee reasonably failed to look for job, and reasonably likely employee would have found job.

23
Q

Mitigation

A

Breaching party not required to compensate injured party for avoidable damages.

24
Q

Mitigation (independent contractor and mitigation to leases)

A

Independent contractor presumed to be capable of handling 1+ Ks at a time. Earnings from other Ks not deducted. In most jurisdictions lessors required to mitigate by attempting to re-rent upon lessee’s default.

25
Q

Non-recoverable damages

A
  1. damages for emotional distress 2. attys fees 3. punitive damages
26
Q

non recoverable damage emotional distress-exceptions

A

Ks dealing with death, Ks of carrier and innkeepers with guests, Wanton/Reckless breach and bodily injury, bodily injury or K or breach of such a natural, emotional distress likely result, and bad faith breach of insurance K

27
Q

non recoverable damage attys fees exceptions

A

If K says available, By law, collateral litigation, lawsuit vs insurer to enforce K

28
Q

non recoverable damage punitive damages exception

A

breach of insurance K

29
Q

Alternatives to expectation damages

A

Reliance, Restitution, Specific performance, and Agreed remedies

30
Q

Reliance

A

Put party in position party was in before K. Application; Expectations too speculative. Out of pocket expenses. Recission of K.

31
Q

Restitution (applications)

A
  1. injured party 2. breaching party 3. either or both parties excused
32
Q

Restitution objective

A

to prevent breaching party from benefitting at the expense of the injured party

33
Q

Restitution-Injured party

A

Damages based on the reasonable value of P’s services and may exceed K price. Losses not deducted.

34
Q

Restitution-Injury party exceptions

A

Injured party must complete performance because breach not material. Injured party has completed performance and breaching party’s only remaining duty is to pay money.

35
Q

Restitution-Breaching party

A

Material breach (no recovery under K). Get reasonable value of the benefit conferred. Amount cannot exceed the K price and recovery offset by $$ owed to injured party

36
Q

Restitution-Either or both parties excused

A

Any of the excusing doctrines (mistake, impracticability, etc). Recovery based on benefit conferred.

37
Q

Specific performance (what is it and when available)

A

Equitable remedy within court’s discretion. Available only where remedy at law inadequate; real prop, damages speculative, unique goods, money damages likely uncollectable.

38
Q

Specific performance-Limitations

A

Court will not order employee to work for employer. (may enjoin employee from working for another through negative injunctive relief). Court will not order employer to hire employee (unless employment discrimination, statutes). Court less likely to order injunctive relief once K has ended. Injunctive relief generally based on unique services.

39
Q

Agreed remedies (liquidated damages clause or penalty)

A

Is the agreed damages clause intended to compensate injured party (OK); OR punish breaching party (Not OK).

40
Q

2 requirements for liquidated damages clause

A

Damages must be uncertain and difficult to prove; AND amount of liquidated damages must be reasonably related or anticipated lossses.

41
Q

Agreed remedies–parties not required to?

A

deduct mitigation earnings