Damage (AO1) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What do damage and damages mean?

A

Damage- Loss incurred by the C as a result of the Ds breach of duty
Damages- The monetary value of the loss (amount of compensation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When the defendant has established that the defendant owed them a duty of care and that the defendant breached this duty of care then they must…

A

Prove that the defendant caused the damage to occur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

To establish whether the defendant caused the claimant to incur a loss the courts must use a two part test, what are both parts?

A
  1. Factual causation
  2. Remoteness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is it established if the D was the factual cause of the loss?

A

Using the but for test. But for the defendants breach of duty the injury or damage to the claimant would not have occured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the principle in Barnett?

A

But for the doctors bad medical advice the security guard would still have died anyway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does remoteness of damage mean?

A

To claim that the defendant caused the loss to incur it must be proven that the damage is a foreseeable result of the Ds breach of duty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the principle in The Wagon Mound (1961)?

A

Although the damage that was caused by the oil spillage was foreseeable the damage caused by the fire was not foreseeable and was too remote.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the principle in Hughes v Lord Advocate (1963)?

A

It was foreseeable that a child might explore the hole, break a lamp and suffer injuries. So the type of injury was foreseeable even though the way in which the explosion occured was not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Hughes v Lord Advocate establish?

A

That if the type of injury was reasonably foreseeable, it doesn’t matter if the precise way it happened is foreseeable or not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the principle for Doughty v Turner Asbestos?

A

The D was not liable as scientific evidence couldn’t predict that an explosion would happen so the damage was not foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the thin skull rule mean?

A

The defendant must take his victim as he finds him

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the principle in Smith v Leech?

A

The courts decided that the burn was foreseeable as the D must take the C as they find them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly