Dallas Agurments Flashcards

1
Q

What is a key counterargument regarding Officer Dallas Perkins’ bias?

A

Perkins’ strong anti-vaping stance could lead him to prematurely blame vaping for Dickie’s distress, without exploring alternative causes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What supports Officer Perkins’ conclusions about black-market vaping?

A

Perkins’ extensive experience and certifications support his conclusions about the dangers of black-market vaping, especially with substances like THC and Vitamin E Acetate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a counterargument related to causation in Dickie’s case?

A

The vape pen’s proximity doesn’t prove Dickie’s collapse was caused by the vape pen, and her asthma may have been the primary factor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What strengthens the claim that vaping contributed to Dickie’s distress?

A

The vape pen’s presence and the lab results connecting THC and Vitamin E Acetate strengthen the claim that vaping contributed to Dickie’s distress and eventual death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What issue arose from Perkins delivering vape pens to the ER?

A

This created a gap in documentation during the transition between the ER and the evidence locker.

(p. 14, ll. 68-70)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the defense argument regarding the gap in documentation?

A

This gap undermines the reliability of the evidence, introducing reasonable doubt about the connection between the evidence and Dickie’s death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the prosecution’s counterargument to the defense’s claim about documentation?

A

The crime lab reported that the evidence bags’ seals were intact upon receipt, ensuring no tampering occurred.

(Exhibit #3, p. 36)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What issue was identified regarding documentation at the scene?

A

Perkins failed to document the exact location of each vape item and did not take photos or additional notes before removing the items.

(p. 14, ll. 35-39)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the defense’s argument about the lack of precise documentation?

A

This creates ambiguity about the origin of the evidence and weakens the case’s foundation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the prosecution’s counterargument regarding the lack of documentation?

A

Perkins prioritized preventing further harm and his written report outlines the evidence seized, aligning with standard police practices in emergencies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What issue arose from Perkins’ interview with Jules Chapelle?

A

Perkins ‘lectured’ Jules about the dangers of vaping, suggesting a personal bias that may affect his objectivity.

(p. 15, ll. 81-82)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the defense argument regarding Perkins’ remarks during the interview?

A

His remarks indicate an emotional response rather than an impartial investigation, casting doubt on the credibility of his testimony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the prosecution’s counterargument about Perkins’ interview approach?

A

The ‘lecture’ was a minor comment and did not affect evidence collection; Perkins’ anti-vaping stance is based on professional expertise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What issue did Perkins acknowledge regarding the scene investigation?

A

He acknowledged that he could have conducted a more thorough investigation, including interviewing additional witnesses.

(p. 14, ll. 103-106)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the defense argument about the limited scene investigation?

A

Perkins’ narrow focus on vaping may have led him to overlook other possible causes for Dickie’s collapse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the prosecution’s counterargument regarding the scene investigation?

A

The immediate priority was addressing the medical emergency and securing evidence; gaps in the initial investigation do not negate lab results.

17
Q

What are the key arguments for the defense?

A
  1. Chain of Custody: The gap in documentation undermines the reliability of the evidence.
  2. Documentation: Lack of precise evidence handling creates reasonable doubt.
  3. Bias: Perkins’ personal stance against vaping could have influenced his focus.
  4. Incomplete Investigation: Failure to consider alternative causes weakens the case.
18
Q

What are the key arguments for the prosecution?

A
  1. Emergency Circumstances: Perkins acted appropriately under time-sensitive conditions.
  2. Evidence Integrity: The lab verified the evidence’s seals were intact.
  3. Professional Expertise: Perkins’ remarks stem from his professional experience.
  4. Lab Results: The presence of THC and Vitamin E Acetate supports the claim that vaping contributed to Dickie’s death.