Daily Reminders Flashcards

1
Q

name the specific intent crimes

A
Solicitation
Conspiracy
Attempt
First Degree Murder
Assault
Larceny
Embezzlement
False Pretenses
Robbery
Burglary
Forgery

Students Can Always Fake A Laugh Especially For Ridiculous Bar Facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

MPC Mental States

A

purposefully: conscious objective to achieve something.
Knowingly: aware that his conduct with likely cause a result.
Recklessly: consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk.
Negligently: fails to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Accomplice liability

A

1st degree - someone who actually engaged in the act.
2nd Degree - Aids, advises, or encourages the principal AND IS present at the crime.
before the fact - aid, advise, or encourages BUT NOT present at the crime.
After the fact - persons who assist the principal after the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When are specific instances of conduct admissible into evidence?

A

When proving MIMIC:

Motive
Intent
(Absence of) Mistake
Identity
Common Scheme (Signature crime or modus operandi)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Statements that are non-hearsay

A
  1. Prior inconsistent statement (under oath).
  2. Prior consistent statement (rebut lying)
  3. Prior identification
  4. Adopted by an opposing party (agent or co-conspirator)

Think: Prior Adoption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hearsay exceptions when the declarant is unavailable

A
  1. Intentionally procured declarant’s unavailability
  2. Former testimony
  3. Statement against interest
  4. Dying declaration
  5. Statement of personal or family history

Intentional Testimony Against Dead Family

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hearsay exceptions when Declarant is available

A
Family records
Learned treatise
Ancient documents
Public records
Property interest docs
Excited utterance
Reputation
Market report
Recorded recollection
Business records
Judgments
Medical diagnosis
Present sense impression
Present state of mind
Present bodily condition

FLAPPER - MR.BJ - Make PPP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Marriage of Lucas?

A

When one spouse dies, the other spouse has no SP interest and no claim for reimbursement unless she can establish that there was an agreement to have SP interest or be reimbursed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Anti-lucas statute

A

Upon death, same as lucas case: No reimbursement or SP interest unless express statement in deed/ title or written agreement.

Upon divorce, reimbursement is allowed for DIP.

Down payment
Improvements
Principal payments on mortgage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Business Valuation when business is started before marriage and grown during marraige:

A

PERERIA case - P: Personal skills and effort
Business is CP because of the personal skills and effort the spouse used to increase the value of the business.

VAN CAMP - VC: Valuable Company or asset; Value the Community labor, then the rest is SP.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How to divide stock options

A

Marriage of Hug - (Length of marriage / total length of options.

Marriage of Nelson - (Length of options during marriage / total length of options)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Common law elements to Burglary

A
Breaking and
Entering into the
Dwelling place of
anOther in the
Nighttime with
Intent to commit a felony therein
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MPC Elements to burglary

A

(1) A person entering;
(2) A building of another; and
(3) With the purpose to commit a crime therein.

Did away with dwelling and nighttime elements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Common law larceny

A

1) The unlawful taking and carrying away;
2) Of someone else’s property;
3) Without the consent of the owner; and
4) With the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Requirements of a valid will

A
  1. Legal Capacity
  2. Testamentary Capacity — Sound Mind
  3. Testamentary Intent
  4. Formalities
    a. Attested [witnessed]
    b. Holographic [entirely in testator’s handwriting]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Insanity defense tests

A

1) MPC - lacked the capacity to appreciate the criminality OR conform his conduct to the law.
(Mental caPacity Conduct)
2) Irrestistible Impulse test - unable to control his actions or conform his conduct to the law.
3) m’Naughten Rule - D has a disease of the mind, and it caused the defect of reason, and D lacked the ability to know the wrongfulness of hs actions or understand the nature and quality of his actions.
Not (Naught) Ten/ten
4) Durham Test - crime was a product of mental illness.

M.I.N.D.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Trust Formation elements:

A

1) Intent,
2) Identifiable Corpus (property)
3) Beneficiaries
4) Proper purpose
5) mechanics and formalities (SOF, etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

PR Duties of an attorney

A
  1. Confidentiality
  2. Loyalty
  3. Financial Responsibilities
  4. Competence
  5. Candor/Truthfulnes
  6. Fairness
  7. Dignity/Decorum

Mnemonic: Clients Love Fierce Counsel; Courts Feel Differently.

19
Q

Discrimination - suspect classes and fundamental rights

20
Q

Cases where statute of frauds is required

A
  1. Marriage
  2. Year (one)
  3. Land sale
  4. Executor contracts
  5. Guarantor assuming debt
  6. Sale of goods > $500

MY LEGS

21
Q

Felony Murder Crimes

A
Burglary
Arson
Assault
Robbery
Kidnapping

BAARK

22
Q

Crime Defenses

A

CANDID CRIME I PAID

Consent
Arrest
Necessity
Duress
Insanity
Diminished Capacity
Claim of right
Resisting unlawful arrest
Intoxication
Mistake
Entrapment

Impossibility

Prevention of crime
Abandonment
Infancy
Defense (self, others, property)

23
Q

Non-hearsay

A

Prior Inconsistent statement under oath
Prior consistent statement to rehab or rebut charge of lying.
prior statement of ID
Adoptive admission (opposing party statement)

PRIOR ADMISSION

24
Q

Suspect Classification

A

Race
Alienage (sometimes)
National origin

RAN

25
Q

Fundamental rights

A

1st amendment
Voting
Interstate travel
Privacy

1 VIP

26
Q

Civ Pro defenses

A

(1) lack of subject-matter jurisdiction;
(2) lack of personal jurisdiction; (waivable)
(3) improper venue; (waivable)
(4) insufficient process; (waivable)
(5) insufficient service of process; (waivable)
(6) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and
(7) failure to join a party under Rule 19.

2-5 are waivable.

27
Q

Reasons for relief of judgment and new trial

A

1) mistake, surprise, excusable neglect (within 1 year);
2) newly discovered evidence (within 1 year);
3) fraud by the other party (within 1 year);
4) judgment void;
5) judgment satisfied;
6) any other reason that is determined to be fair by the court.

28
Q

Federal service requirements

A

1) personal service;
2) left at the home with suitable age living there;
3) service upon authorized agent;
4) under state rules;
5) vial mail by waiver

29
Q

When is venue proper?

A

1) any district where a D resides if all D’s are in-state;
2) where the action occurred;
3) if not 1 or 2, then any state where PJ is satisfied for any D.

30
Q

Elements for issue preclusion

A

1) prior action ended in Final judgment
2) issue actually Litigated
3) issue was Essential to the judgment
4) party bound by prior judgment was a party or in Privity in prior action.

FLEP
Final Litigation Essentially Privity

31
Q

Privacy Torts

A

1) appropriation for Commercial advantage
2) intrusion upon Seclusion
3) false Light
4) public disclosure of Private fact.

CILP
Commercial Intrusion Lights Privates

32
Q

Lemon Test

A

Two dudes entangling arms, sharing a urinal, saying Per-Fect

excessive entanglement
non-secular purpose
effect to enhance religion.

33
Q

Slander per se

A

Damages are presumed

Crimes
Loathesome disease
Unchastity of woman
Business

CLUB

34
Q

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

A

1) Intentional conduct
2) Extreme and outrageous
3) Distress (emotional)

IED

35
Q

Commerce Clause analysis

A

Congress may regulate:

1) Channels
2) Instrumentalities
3) Activities with substantial effect

CIA.

For intrastate activities, rational basis applies if there is:

1) economic or commercial activity
2) the activity IN AGGREGATE substantially affects interstate commerce.

Cannot aggregate non-commercial activites

36
Q

Murder Essay Analysis

A

Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with malice aforethought.
Malice aforethought is present when the defendant has any of the following states of mind: (i) the intent to kill, (ii) the intent to inflict great bodily injury, (iii) reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life, or (iv) the intent to commit a felony.

37
Q

4th amendment template

A

4th amendment is applicable to the states via the 14th amendment.
Was there Government Conduct?
Was there a Reasonable Expectation of privacy?
Warrant requirement (Yes, unless exception)
Exceptions

38
Q

Commerce power Template

A

Under the commerce clause, Congress has the broad power to regulate the 1) channels, 2) instrumentalities, and 3) activities of interstate commerce. (CIA)
Only economic activities that are have a substantial effect on interstate commerce can be regulated under prong 3.

Congress may regulate intrastate activities if, in in aggregate, the activities could have a substantial effect on interstate commerce.

39
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause Template

A

A state law that discriminates against out of state competition is invalid unless:

1) the law furthers an important state interest and there are no reasonable alternatives.
2) state is a market participant
3) the action is a traditional government function (voting).

A law that doesn’t discriminate is invalid if the burden to interstate commerce outweighs the state’s interest.

40
Q

Personal Jurisdiction Template

A
TRADITIONAL PJ
LONG ARM STATUTE
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS
For the court to have PJ over an out-of-state person or entity, the exercise of PJ must be authorized by long arm statute and must be constitutional which means there must be sufficient contacts with the forum state so as to not offend the traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. 
- Minimum contacts
- Purposeful availment
- Foreseeability
- Relatedness of the claim to the contact
GENERAL JX
SPECIFIC JX
- fairness
- Convenience
- state's interest
- other factors
41
Q

False Imprisonment Elements

A

unlawful confinement without consent that substantially interferes with the victims liberty.

42
Q

Contracts Essay Template

A
Governing Law
Contract formation
SOF
Breach
Damages
43
Q

Defenses to Contract formation

A
Mistake
Unconscionability
Statute of frauds
Capacity (lack of)
Illegality
Duress/fraud

MUSCID

44
Q

Duty of director

A

Duty of care.
Duty to disclose.
duty of loyalty