Customs Duties And Charges Having Equivalent Effect Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Where do you find the prohibition of customs duties and CEEs?

A

Art 30 TFEU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where do you find the definition of a customs duty?

A

It is not in Art 30 TFEU so you use the ordinary meaning of customs duty in international trade.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the ordinary meaning of customs duty?

A

A tax levied on imports by customs authorities of a country to raise state revenue, and/or protect domestic industries. It is generally based on the value of goods or upon the weight, dimensions or some other criteria of the item.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which case defines what a charge having equivalent effect (CEE) is?

A

Commission v Italy (Statistical Levy) [1969]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the definition of a CEE?

A

‘…any pecuniary charge, however small and whatever its designation and mode of application, which is imposed unilaterally on domestic or foreign goods by reason of the fact that they cross a frontier, and which is not a customs duty in the strict sense’
Commission v Italy (Statistical Levy) [1969]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is the prohibition of customs duties and CEEs under Art 30 TFEU absolute?

A

Yes. There are no justifications.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which case established that a customs duty on the export of cultural treasures where not justified by an attempt to preserve cultural heritage?

A

Commission v Italy (Art Treasures) [1968]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which case established that a special import duty levied on the issue of import licences for gingerbread to equate the price of foreign products with Belgian products was a CEE?

A

Commission v Luxembourg and Belgium (Gingerbread) [1962]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case established that even when the charge levied was not protectionist and was for a benevolent purpose, it would still be considered a CEE?

A

Diamond Workers [1969]

Purpose was to set up a social fund for workers in Belgian diamond industry.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the three types of permissible charges that will not result in a breach of Art 30 TFEU?

A

(1) Fees for a genuine service that directly benefits importers
(2) Fees required by Union law
(3) Charges as part of internal taxation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which case established that a permissible charge, as a genuine service that directly benefits importers must be proportionate to the service rendered?

A

Ford España SA v Estado español [1989]

Cost based on value of goods (not cost of service) was not proportionate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did the CJEU rule in Commission v Belgium (Customs Warehouses) [1983]?

A

First charge, which was compulsory charge for storage of goods whilst completing customs formalities, was a CEE.
Second charge, optional charge to keep goods in storage for additional period after inspection, was a genuine service.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did the CJEU rule in Bresciani [1976]?

A

Benefit of charge for a genuine service must relate directly to the specific importer and not the general public.
Cow hide quality inspection charge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In which case did the CJEU rule that a charge levied for the collection of statistical data was not a genuine service that directly benefitted the importer, but that it benefitted the general public?

A

Commission v Italy (Statistical Levy) [1969]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In which case did the CJEU rule that fees required by Union law for mandatory health and veterinary inspections on live animals would not be CEEs as long as the charge did not exceed the actual cost of inspection?

A

Bauhuis v Netherlands [1977]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What criteria did the CJEU provide in Commission v Germany [1988] for assessing when a fee required by EU law will not be a CEE?

A

(1) if the charge does not exceed the actual cost of the inspection
(2) if inspections are obligatory and uniform
(3) prescribed in EU interest
(4) promote free movement of goods by neutralising obstacles

17
Q

Which case established that traders are able to recover the charges paid in breach of Art 30 TFEU?

A

San Giorgio [1983]

18
Q

If a trader has fully transferred the cost of the charges levied by a MS to the consumers, why can’t they recover anything through a restitutionary claim?

A

It would equate to paying the trader twice over - Comateb [1997] para 22

19
Q

If a trader has only partially transferred the cost of charges paid in breach of Art 30 TFEU to consumers, how much can they recover through a restitutionary claim to a MS?

A

Only as much as they did not pass on to consumers.

20
Q

Which case confirmed that a trader may also bring an action for loss of sales/damages after a breach of Art 30 TFEU by a MS has been established?

A

Comateb [1977]

21
Q

What are the two ways you might recover loss of sales from a MS that originate from a breach of Art 30 TFEU?

A
  • through the national court system

- or if this is not possible, under the Brasserie and Factortame III state liability principle