Customary Marriage Flashcards
What is the Definition of a customary law marriage
A customary law marriage, as defined by Justice Ollenu in Yaotey v Quaye, is a union of a man’s family and woman’s family that imposes rights and duties on both families.
The woman’s family gains the right to perform certain rites in certain eventualities and the man’s family also gains the right to perform certain rites in certain eventualities”.
What are the special characteristics of a customary law marriage?
- Customary law marriages are potentially polygamous – the man is entitled to marry as many as he can harmoniously live with and conveniently manage -Graham v. Graham (1965) GLR PG 407. A mere promise by a man to his wife not marry additional women does does not prevent the marriage from being potentially polygamous.
What are the special characteristics of a customary law marriage? (Consanguinity)
- Some marriages are prohibited on grounds on consanguinity -i .e. Where there is blood relationship between the man and the woman. The prohibition differs from tribe to tribe. In places like India and Malaysia and in some tribes in Ghana , you can marry your blood relation. The prohibition is to avoid unnecessary (negative) traits borne of consanguinity that run through the family.
What are the special characteristics of a customary law marriage? (Mutual Exclusivity)
- Customary law marriages and marriages under the Ordinance are mutually exclusive.
o One is potentially polygamous and the other is monogamous thus they cannot co-exist.
o Where a man married under customary law wants to marry another woman under the Ordinance or vice versa, the first marriage must be dissolved or else the latter/second marriage is null, void and not of any consequence.
- Similarly, if a man has married different women under customary law and wants to marry one of them under the Ordinance, he must divorce the others or else the purported conversion is void.
What are the special characteristics of a customary law marriage? (Conversion)
- A customary law marriage may be converted to an ordinance marriage.
o Graham v Graham: Court held that after the solemnization of the marriage under the Ordinance, the customary law marriage ceases to exist.
When this happens, the customary law marriage falls away automatically. A man married under ordinance cannot enter into a valid customary law marriage or, a marriage under the ordinance with another woman. The second marriage is null and void and the man could also be charged with bigamy.
What are the special characteristics of a customary law marriage?
- Customary law marriages have become synonymous with engagements. The ring is not part of customary law, but it is invariably given at traditional weddings. The giving of the Bible and ring, shows an intention to marry under the ordinance and can form the basis for an action for breach of promise to marry under the ordinance – Affrifah v. Class-Peter.
- The existence of a customary law marriage is not a condition precedent to the creation of an ordinance marriage. The existence of a customary law marriage, is not one of the mandatory requirements stipulated in the Marriages Act. Some churches may however demand the existence of a customary law marriage before a church marriage ceremony. This is a church rule that has nothing to do with the provisions of the Marriages Act.
- There is a first stage in the marriage ceremony known as knocking which is the preparatory stage of the marriage.
What are the types of customary law marriage?
- There are 2 types of customary law marriage: formal and informal marriage
• Formal customary marriage is where drinks are brought to signify the marriage
Informal is where the couple are living as husband and wife with no exchange of drinks and are acknowledged by the man’s family as well as the woman’s family.
o Gorleku v Pobee: Court stated that there are two forms of marriage, one involves the presentation of drinks and other items and the other is devoid of such formalities. In both cases, the marriage is considered valid, provided there is consent from the parties and their families of the union.
Formal and Informal Marriages According to Justice Ollenu
Justice Ollenu created two forms of customary marriage: the formal and informal customary law marriages. This notion was formulated because of the uncertainty that surrounded the finding of a valid customary law marriage since it was difficult to prove a customary law marriage (i.e there was no formal proof of a customary marriage such as a marriage certificate).
Formal Customary Marriage
The formal customary law marriage occurs where the man’s family formally presents drinks to the woman’s family and the drinks are accepted by the family of the woman
Informal Customary Marriage
There are 4 or 5 types of informal customary law marriages. Some may apply today and others may not apply today. However it is important to know about them as you will have to discuss them if a question is asked on it.
(1) The first type identified by Ollenu J is where a man impregnates a woman, he sends drinks to acknowledge the pregnancy and thereafter he starts living with the woman as though they are husband and wife. If they live for a considerable length of time, the baby is born but the man has not performed any marital rites, the court may hold after sometime that an informal marriage is in existence. The drinks are for the pregnancy not the informal marriage, Quaye v Kuevi
Informal Customary Marriage (cont’d)
(2) The second type is where a man impregnates a woman and he sends a first drink to acknowledge that the pregnancy is his and then he sends a second drink without stating the purpose. The law says if the family of the girl accepts the second drink then an informal customary law marriage has been created. This is because it may be assumed that the sending of the second drink is the man asking the girl’s hand in marriage. The difference between this and a formal customary marriage is consent (express or implied).
Informal Customary Marriage (cont’d)
(3) The third informal marriage occurs where another man sleeps with someone else’s wife . Where this occurs, the man can either keep the wife and accept compensation for his injured feeling or send the woman on her way and dissolve the marriage. Where the marriage is dissolved, the man can demand a refund on all expenses he incurred at the time he was marrying the woman from the woman’s family. The paramour (the man who slept with someone’s wife) can decide to pay for the refund and then step into the shoes of the husband. Because he has paid for the refund of the expenses he does not have to perform any other marriage rites , he will just take the woman. The law will recognize this as an informal marriage. See Assumah v Khair
Informal Customary Marriage (cont’d)
(4) Another form of informal customary law marriage is where the man and the woman are acknowledged by their respective families as husband and wife. No ceremonies would have been performed. See Yaotey v Quaye, Essilfie and another v Quarcoo; Re Dixon alias Appiah; Aboagye and another v Quayson; Gorlekuu v Pobee
What are the four essentials? Yaotey v Quaye (A - C - C - C)
A - C - C- C (Agreement, Consent of man’s family, Consent of woman’s family, Consummation by cohabitation)
In this case, Ollenu first established that there can be two forms of customary law marriage: formal and informal. He set up four essential elements that the court should consider when deciding whether there is a valid customary law marriage in existence. He also stated that these four essentials should apply to all tribes. These four essentials are:
a) whether there was an agreement between the man and the woman to live as husband and wife
b) the court must consider whether there was consent on the part of the man’s family that he should take the woman as his wife.
c) Consent of the family of the woman that she may have the man as her husband.
d) Consummation by cohabitation.
Why did Ollenu introduce the four essentials?
- Justice Ollenu introduced the four essentials to correct the injustices of the past and also to facilitate proof of the existence of a valid customary law marriage, especially in issues relating to succession.
- Ollenu was of the view that woman who lived with men and were for all intents and purposes their wives, even though there was formal ceremony or exchange of drinks. These women often lost out and were not given any proportion of the man’s estate if he died intestate because it could not be proved to a degree of sufficient certainty for the court that a marriage existed, mostly because there was no documentation.