current issues Flashcards
how has past research worked?
- historically, research has involved researchers forming hypotheses and then seeking out certain populations to test these hypotheses
- they then analyse their data and publish their conclusions relating to that population
issues with past research
- now recognised that making assumptions, testing assumptions and publishing conclusions about a certain population WITHOUT input from that population is not good practice
- people with neurodevelopmental conditions are often left out of the very research which is about them
- often, research focusses on asking family members, educators and clinicians about the individual
–> alot of these individuals could answer questions too
a problem in autistic research
- autistic advocates argue that conventional research provides too few opportunities for genuine engagement with autistic people
–> contributing to “social disenfranchisement” among autistic people - recent research demonstrates that world wide autistic people, their families, educators, and clinicians feel that autism research generally fails to describe the nature of autistic life experiences
what is co-production?
it is the process of conducting research in partnership with the population you are focusing on
what are the levels of co-production? (lowest to highest)
- consultation:
–> autistic Ps asked for opinions/ideas but no formal involvement - involvement
–> autistic Ps have the opportunity to take an active role and and have more input in decision making (still heavily led by clinician) - participation
–> autistic Ps take part in defined activities and have some freedom in agenda / research design - co-production
–> equal collaboration between clinicians and autistic Ps (including joint decision making in the process)
why use co-production?
- might get more effective research if we actively involve community members who can direct attention to aspects of experience that are routinely missed without such input
–> informs science/theory
–> applied to everyday life - clearethicalreasons for involvement in research
–> marginalized communities are often not involved in making decisions that affect them - the disability rights mantra:
–> “nothing about us, without us”
–> people should be able to contribute to research that could in some way affect their lives
what does ‘experts by experience’ mean?
- research demonstrates positive effects
- better insights
- more involved
- can have applied affects (instead of being disconnected)
- challenges our preconceptions
importance of co-production
particularly important in light of research focusing on current real world events
is co-production used broadly?
although co-production is increasingly popular in autism research, this is not the case across all conditions
impact of lockdown on neurodevelopmental conditions
- lockdown was necessary, but not without long reaching implications
- it saved lives, but also impacted people’s mental well-being
Covid-19 and Down Syndrome
- adults over the age of 40 years were 4x more likely to be hospitalized and 10x more likely to die from COVID-19
- adults with DS faced unique challenges from societal efforts to curb the spread of COVID-19
- quarantining and social distancing likely led to reductions in disability programs that adults with DS normally rely on
- adults with DS are often not able to benefit fromtelehealthor virtual services to the same extent as their non-DS peers
- the pandemic may also have reduced activities important for mood & behavior regulation and overall health including exercise and time spent outdoors
–> these activities are often fostered by disability programs
Covid-19 and Down Syndrome (Hartley et al., 2022)
- between September 2020 and February 2021, caregivers of 171 adults with Down syndrome (aged 22–66 years)
- 33% of individuals were more irritable or easily angered
- 52% were more anxious
- 41% were more sad/depressed/unhappy relative to pre-pandemic
- the majority of changes in mood and behavior were of modest severity
NICE guidelines and Covid-19
- during the pandemic NICE published a scale setting out who to prioritise for care if resources ran short
- those who need support for day-to-day living (e.g. people with learning disabilities) were not prioritised on this scale
–> led to many people being issued a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) - Mencap contacted NICE who agreed the scale shouldn’t apply to people with learning disabilities & updated their guidance
- NHS England responded quickly, but still some people who have a DNR who don’t know
Covid-19 and ADHD (Bobo et al., 2020)
- 533 French parents of ADHD children & adolescents (m age=10.5, 58 girls)
- questionnaire with open-ended and closed questions (mixed methods)
Covid-19 and ADHD (Bobo et al., 2020) - qualitative results
- kids suffered socially
- suffered with their education
- can be emotional and violent
- lost routine
–> including sleeping patterns - some found the flexibility to benefit them
–> less rigid/busy schedules
–> less school pressure and a more suitable pace - some found that more time spent with their child changed their perception of their child