Cultural variations in attachments Flashcards

1
Q

Individualistic cultures

A

Western cultures that value independence and the importance of the individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Collectivist cultures

A

Non western countries that emphasise the importance of the group or collective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ainsworth in Uganda (1967)

A

Two year naturalistic study of mother infant interactions in uganda, 1954. Participants were 26 mothers and infantssome mothers were more ‘sensitive’ to their infants needs and these mothers tended to have ‘securely attached’ infants. Secure attachment then led the infant to have increasing competence and independence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Simonella et al (2014)

A

Italian study in a sample of 76 12 month olds using the strange situation 50% were found to be securely attached and 36% insecure-avoidant. This is a lower rate of secure attachments than found in other studies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why were there less secure attachments in italy?

A

increase of women in work and are using professional childcare. Simonella (2014) findings suggest that cultural changes can make a dramatic difference to patterns of secure and insecure attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Jin et al (2012)

A

A Korean study on 87 children using the strange situation, it showed similar proportions of attachments as Japan. Probably due to similar child rearing techniques in collectivist cultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tronick et al (1992)

A

Studied an African tribe, the Efe, from Zaire who live in extended family groups which means that the infants were looked after and breastfed by different women (slept with mothers at night). The infants at 6 months, still showed 1 primary attachment - supports idea of monotropy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Takahashi (1990)

A

Japanese study on 60 middle class infants and found similar rates of secure and insecure attachments to the US but they showed no insecure-avoidant attachment and high rates of insecure-resistant attachment (32%). Also, infants were distressed on being left alone and their response was so extreme that for 90% of the infants the study was stopped.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Grossman and Grossman (1991)

A

German infants tended to be classified as insecurely attached rather than securely attached and this may be due to child-rearing practices where parents and children tend to maintain some interpersonal distance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988)

A

Meta analysis of 32 studies and 2000 strange situations in 8 countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the countries in Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988)

A

China, Netherlands, UK, Japan, Israel, Sweden, US, West germany

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) results (Secure attachments)

A

Secure attachments was the most common. China had the lowest amount of secure attachments (only 50%) but an equal amount of Type A and Type B attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) results (Insecure avoidant attachments)

A

Insecure avoidant attachments were the next most common except in Israel and Japan. Insecure-avoidant was particularly high in individualist cultures like West Germany which put greatest emphasis on independence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) results (Insecure resistant attachments)

A

Insecure-resistant is most common in collectivist cultures such as Japan and Israel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) results (variations)

A

Variations between results of studies within the same country were actually 150% greater than those between countries. In the USA for example, one study found only 46% securely attached compared to one sample as high as 90%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did they conclude from Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s (1988) study?

A

Secure attachment is most common, suggesting that most babies, regardless of the culture form secure attachments. This supports the idea that secure attachment is ‘best’ for social and emotional development and that attachment is an innate and biological process. However, cultural practises can have a significant impact on the likelihood of a baby forming either an insecure-avoidant or insecure-resistant attachment.

17
Q

What is an advantage of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s (1988) study?

A

Large sample and this increases internal validity by reducing the impact of anomalous results caused by bad methodology or very unusual participants

18
Q

What are the disadvantages of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s (1988) study?

A
  • Samples can be unrepresentative of culture
  • Method of assessment is biased
19
Q

How are the samples in Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s study unrepresentative of culture?

A

Meta-analysis studied cultural variation but the comparisons were between countries and not cultures. Within any country there are many cultures and one sample could over represent poor people or even rich people

20
Q

How was the method of assessment biased in Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s study?

A

cross cultural psychology includes the ideas of emic and etic. Strange Situation was designed by an American researcher, Ainsworth, based on a British theory by Bowlby. ‘Can western based theories be applied to other cultures?’

21
Q

Emic

A

the uniqueness of each culture

22
Q

Etic

A

related to cultural universality

23
Q

Rothbaum et al (2000)

A

Argued that attachment theory and research is not relevant to other cultures because it is so rooted in American culture. Looked in particular at the contrasts between American and Japanese culture. He considered 3 major differences

24
Q

What are the 3 major differences Rothbaum found?

A

Sensitivity hypothesis, Continuity Hypothesis and Secure base hypothesis

25
Q

sensitivity hypothesis

A

Bowlby and Ainsworth promoted the view that a sensitive mother encourages her child to become independent. However in collectivist cultures like Japan, sensitivity is about promoting dependence rather than independence.

26
Q

Continuity hypothesis

A

Bowlby and Ainsworth said that infants who are securely attached become more socially and emotionally competent people. But in Western cultures ‘emotionally competent’ has a different meaning (individuals are expected show their emotions). In others cultures-including Japan- individuals are not expected to show and share their emotions.

27
Q

secure base hypothesis

A

In the West, secure attachments are seen as providing an infant with a secure base from which to explore, thus promoting independence. Attachment relationships in Japan are dependence-oriented