Cultrual Flashcards
Culture
system of shared, learned values and norms
Values
abstract ideas about the good, right and desirable
Norms
extensions of values- rules and guidelines for living in a society
Mores
central to functioning of social life- bring serious retribution
Folkways
less serious retribution, smaller things- dress code
Herodotus
first historian/geographer/anthropologist- maintains neutrality- no judgement- ‘barbarian’ meaning different from us
Aristotle
naturalist- introduced evaluative aspect- telos- we are different by nature- biological incapability of reasoning
Hippocrates
cultural-historical stance- group differences arise from differences in climate and social environment/institutions
Natural vs. Cultural-Historical Science
Natural- seek knowledge about stable, universal processes
Cultural-Historical- organisation of people’s lives and the environmental influences on people
Shweder
Comments on the zeitgeist of psychology as being naturalistic- seeking universal truths- culture merely creating noise- need to isolate central processing unit.
Modern psychology treats culture as an added thing (independent variable) but not something that penetrates our basic mental processes and inherently part of us
Schwarts
3 requisites for values: needs as biological organisms, coordinated social interaction, smooth functioning and survival of groups
10 types of values e.g. conformity, self-direction
Hofstede (1963-73)
4 dimensions + 2 extra
IBM employees across 70 countries
Power distance- attitudes towards inequality- Aus- low
Individualism/ Collectivism
Uncertainty avoidance
Femininity/ Masculinity
Pragmatism- focus on trying to live right rather than trying to find truth of existence- answering why questions. And long-term orientation
Indulgence- controlling desires and impulses
Aus diverges from China in Power distance, Pragmatism and Indulgence
Hofstede’s view
Culture is a source of conflict, significant cultural differences so have to be aware and respectful but only plays an amplifying role on the same mental processes we all experience
Shweder’s view
Can’t separate the mind from content or context (provided by culture)- qualitatively different depending on context e.g. Norway
Mind arises from culture and culture arises form the mind - mutually constituted
Analytic vs Holistic Thinking
Analytic: separating objects from each other- breaking down components and rules to explain behaviour- relies on abstract thought
Holistic: focus on the entire scene and relations among objects in the scene- relies on associative thought
Related to independent and interdependent cultures
Photo study
Westerners describe wolf first and are able to identify wolf better in new context. Japanese don’t separate the wolf from the background so find it harder to identify later
Older Singaporeans- less activity in object processing
Facial Expressions
East asians explain the emotion using the surrounding social context
Art and photography
Chinese art- more happening around central object
Masudu (2008)- portaits- face to frame ratio- 3x amount of frame in Western
Taking photos- Americans devote more space to focal object, Asians more background
Understanding Behaviour
Westerners explain people’s behaviour by attending to their personal characteristics- dispositional vs. situational info
Fidel Castro essay study- fundamental attribution error by Americans- no matter what other info given, still said writer was on Castro’s side?
Miller: Only as Americans get old are they more dispositional- very similar to Indians when young but then Indians diverge to more situational attributions
Self-concept and self-enhancement
independent vs interdependent view of self
not everyone engages in self-enhancement or just enhance different thing?- much disagreement
Definition of Honour culture- non-nationalistic approach- diffs in different parts of nation
small disputes become contests for reputation and status
Southern White male
Evidence
In South people believe a drunk man who bumps into one's wife should be punished more than in North More homocides related to arguments about one's status Insult Study (Cohen, Nisbett, Bowdle and Schwartz, 1996)- South more anger, North more amusement. South: 2. higher levels of cortisol and testosterone 3. stronger handshake and dominant posture 4. more cognitively primed for aggression-looking for things to break the door Chicken game- South: less distance before avoiding bouncer after insult but more courteous when not insulted