Culpable Homicide Flashcards
what intent is required for a charge of murder
The critical factors to be considered for a charge of murder are whether the offender intended to:
- kill the person
- cause bodily injury that the offender knew was likely to cause death
if neither of these can be proven then it is manslaughter
what is the definition of homicide
s158
homicide is the killing of a human being by another, directly or indirectly, by any means whatsoever
with regards to an organisation, what can they be convicted of in relation to a homicide
- an organisation can be convicted as a party to the offence of MANSLAUGHTER
- an organisation cannot be convicted as either a principal offender or a party to the offence of MURDER, this is because the offence carries a mandatory life sentence
when does a child become a human being (and therefore is capable of being murdered
s159
1) a child becomes a human being when it has completely proceeded in a living state from the body of its mother, whether it has an independent circulation or not and whether the naval string is severed or not
2) the killing of such a child is homicide if it dies in consequence injuries received before, during or after birth
what is a culpable homicide
culpable homicide means the killing is blameworthy
s160
2) homicide is culpable when it consists in the killing of any person:
a) by an unlawful act; or
b) by an omission without lawful excuse to perform or observe any legal duty; or
c) by both combined; or
d) by causing that person by threats or fear of violence, or by deception, to do an act which causes his death; or
e) by wilfully frightening a child under the age of 16 years or a sick person
what is an unlawful act
an unlawful act means a breach of any act, regulation, rule or bylaw
the common law requires that the act must be one that is likely to do harm or inherently dangerous as well as being unlawful
R v Myatt
what did r v lee confirm
the act must be objectively dangerous, that is, would a reasonable person in the shoes of the defendant know the risk of harm existed
with regards to s150A what are some examples of a major departure from the standard of care that have been supported by common law
- committing arson
- giving a child an excessive amount of alcohol
- placing hot cylinders and straw on a drunk person to scare them
- supplying heroin to a person who subsequently dies from it
- throwing a large piece of concrete from a motorway overbridge onto path of a travelling car
- conducting illegal abortion where mother dies
what is a legal duty and what are duties defined in the crimes act 1961
duties imposed by statute or common law including uncodified common law duties.
the crimes act 1961 defines duties to preserve life as the duty:
- to provide necessaries and protect from injury (s151)
- to provide necessaries and protect from injury to your charges when you are a parent or guardian (s152)
- to provide necessaries as an employer (s153)
- to use reasonable knowledge and skill when performing dangerous acts, such as surgery (s155)
- to take precautions when in charge of dangerous things, such as machinery (s156)
- to avoid omissions that will endanger life (s157)
omission of legal duties can amount to homicide, for the requisite casual connection what must the omission amount to
it seems it must appear that death would not have occurred had the defendant performed the duty in question, and the omission must have been a substantial and operative cause of death
what is an example of when an unlawful act and an omission to perform a legal duty are applicable to the same act (s160(2)(c))
to drive a car so recklessly that you kill a pedestrian is both an unlawful act and an omission to observe your duty to take precautions when you are in charge of a dangerous thing
when is a person guilty of murder under s160(2)(d)
If they cause the victim by threats, fear, of violence or deception, to do an act that results in the victims death.
what are some examples of culpable homicide caused by actions prompted by threats, fear of violence or deception
when a person:
- jumps or falls out of a window and dies because they think they are going to be assaulted
- jumps into a river to escape an attack and drowns
- who has been assaulted and believes their life is in danger, jumps from a moving train and is killed
what act is required to frighten a child or a sick person under s160(2)(e)
any act that frightens the child or sick person as long as it is done wilfully
wilfully is regarded as intending
the defendant must have been aware of a real risk that the victim is under 16 or sick
what does simmester and brookbanks suggest about wilfully
wilfully would require that the offender intended to frighten or is at least subjectively reckless as to the risk of that