Culpable Homicide Flashcards
The critical factors to consider for a charge of murder are whether the offender intended to:
- kill the person, or
* cause bodily injury that the offender knew was likely to cause death
You can charge an offender with manslaughter in any case where
a person has been killed in a manner that does not amount to murder.
a jury may return a verdict of manslaughter….
if it feels intent or any of the other elements of murder have not been proved
What is homicide defined?
Section 158, CA 1961
Homicide defined
Homicide is the killing of a human being by another, directly or indirectly, by any means whatsoever.
Can a organisation be charged as a party to manslaughter?
Yes
Can an organisation be charged with manslaughter or murder/parties to murder?
no
Killing of a child
Section 159
(1) A child becomes a human being within the meaning of this Act when it has completely proceeded in a living state from the body of its mother, whether it has breathed or not, whether it has an independent circulation or not, and whether the navel string is severed or not. (2) The killing of such child is homicide if it dies in consequence of injuries received before, during, or after birth.
Culpable Homicide
160 Culpable homicide
(1) Homicide may be either culpable or not culpable.
(2) Homicide is culpable when it consists in the killing of any person—
(a) By an unlawful act; or
(b) By an omission without lawful excuse to perform or observe any legal duty; or
(c) By both combined; or
(d) By causing that person by threats or fear of violence, or by deception, to do an act which causes his death; or
(e) By wilfully frightening a child under the age of 16 years or a sick person.
(3) Except as provided in section 178 of this Act, culpable homicide is either murder or manslaughter.
(4) Homicide that is not culpable is not an offence.
Define unlawful act
a breach of any Act, regulation, rule, or bylaw
To prove culpable homicide under section 160(2)(a) you need to prove
death was caused (at least in part) by the breach of an Act, regulation, rule or bylaw.
In common law, allegations of culpable homicide have been supported where the offender has caused death by:
- committing arson
- giving a child an excessive amount of alcohol to drink
- placing hot cinders and straw on a drunk person to frighten them
- supplying heroin to a person who subsequently dies from an overdose
- throwing a large piece of concrete from a motorway overbridge into the path of an approaching car
- conducting an illegal abortion where the mother dies.
The expression “legal duty” refers to
those duties imposed by statute or common law including uncodified common law duties:
Duties imposed by statute are mainly common law duties that have been embodied in statute. The Crimes Act 1961 defines duties to:
- provide the necessaries and protect from injury (s151)
- provide necessaries and protect from injury to your charges when you are a parent or guardian (s152)
- provide necessaries as an employer (s153)
- use reasonable knowledge and skill when performing dangerous acts, such as surgery (s155)
- take precautions when in charge of dangerous things, such as machinery (s156)
- avoid omissions that will endanger life (s157).
Omission of legal duties can amount to homicide. For the requisite causal connection, it seems that it must appear that
death would not have occurred as and when it did had the defendant performed the duty in question, and it must have been “a substantial and operative cause of death”
Can an unlawful act and omission occur at the same time?
For example, to drive a car so recklessly that you kill a pedestrian is both an unlawful act and an omission to observe your duty to take precautions when you are in charge of a dangerous thing (s156)