Culpable Homicide Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is the definition of CH

A

applied to cases where the death of a person is caused, or accelerated, by the improper conduct of another and where the guilt doesn’t come up to the crime of murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does Drury v HMA state about CH

A

culpable homicide covers the killing of human beings in all circumstances short of murder, where the criminal law attaches a relevant measure of blame to the person who kills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the definition of murder

A

any wilful act causing the destruction of life, whether wickedly intended to kill, or displaying such wicked recklessness as to imply a disposition depraved enough to be regardless of consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

mens rea of CH

A
  • the ‘forbidden behaviour’ is not criminal unless performed with the requisite mental state
  • Only if the MR for murder is in some way diminished does the lesser charge of culpable homicide become the correct one
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The 4 categories of culpable homicide

A
  • Assault type
  • Involuntary by an unlawful act
  • Involuntary by a lawful act
  • Voluntary act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is assault type

A
  • Death brought by a deliberate unlawful act, e.g, assault
  • Death is causally linked to an assault, but may not be the foreseeable outcome of the assault
  • MR doesn’t satisfy the ‘wicked intention to kill’ required for murder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

is foreseeability relevant in CH assault type

A
  • Foreseeability is irrelevant
  • assault type culpable homicide is death caused by any intentional unlawful act. Immaterial whether death was the foreseebale result of that act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

case facts of Bird v HMA

A

Accused assumed the risk of liability for death by committing the assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

case facts of HMA v Hartley 1989

A

Death occurred but there was an absence of wicked recklessness in accused’s actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the defence of provocation

A
  • Partial defence, may reduce the level of culpability from murder to culpable homicide
  • Can’t reduce criminal liability from culpable homicide to assault
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the requirements for provocation

A
  • Must be either a serious physical attack, or evidence of adultery
  • Loss of control exhibited
  • Response must be immediate
  • Proportionate response by the accused
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

case facts of McDermott v HMA 1973

A
  • A lost self-control when he discovered his partner had an association with another man
  • Provocation was no excuse, but accepted as mitigation
  • Charge reduced from murder to culpable homicide on basis of evidence led
  • Lack of necessary MR for murder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

definition of involuntary culpable homicide by an unlawful act

A
  • A commits a crime and through their criminal actions causes a death, even if it was unintentional
  • However, death would have been foreseeable (intention to harm)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

actus reus and mens rea of involuntary culpable homicide by an unlawful act

A
  • AR; unlawful act
  • MR; recklessness, unlawful act is carried in such a manner that injury is foreseeable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

case facts of Mathieson v HMA 1981

A
  • Unlawful act of reckless fire raising resulted in death
  • A found liable of CH
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

case facts of Lord Advocate’s reference (No1 of 1994)

A
  • supply of prescribed drugs
  • A was charged with supplying a controlled drug to the V
  • Does taken by V was fatal
  • Trial judge was wrong to acquit the accused of culpable homicide – he was reckless and knew the dangers
  • If A caused ‘real injury’ resulting in death to a 3rd party, then A must be found guilty of culpable homicide by an involuntary unlawful act
17
Q

definition of Culpable Homicide by a Lawful Act

A

Death caused by the grossly careless manner of performing an otherwise lawful act

18
Q

MR of Culpable Homicide by a Lawful Act

A

simple recklessness

19
Q

what is simple recklessness

A

sometimes referred to as gross or criminal negligence

20
Q

what is the definition of Culpable Homicide by a voluntary act

A

A has the MR for murder but can succesfully plead provocation or DM

21
Q

case for Culpable Homicide by a voluntary act and facts

A
  • Drury v HMA 2001
  • Evidence relating to provocation is simply one of the factors the jury should take into account determining the accused’s state of mind at the time
22
Q

when does an orgainsation commit corporate homicide

A
  • The way its activities are managed cause death
  • There was a gross breach of DoC owed to that person