Crystal Field Theory Flashcards
Who developed CFT and when
- Hans Bethe
2. 1929
Why did Bethe develop CFT
- In order to interpret colour spectra and magnetism in crystals
- For the solid state
What did Van Vleck do
- 1932
2. Used CFT to interpret some properties of TM complexes- solutions
What are 3 assumptions used in CFT
- Interactions between ligands and metals are electrostatic (ionic)
- The metal and ligands are point charges; lone-pairs of ligand electrons are treated as negative charges; the metal centre as a point positive charge
- No metal-ligand covalent interactions are considered
What are 3 shortcomings of CFT
- Metal-ligand interactions are not purely electrostatic (ionic)
- The metal and ligands are not point charges (have a steric demand)
- There is some covalency in metal-ligand interactions
Describe the spherical case for a 3d metal
- The metal Mn+ is placed at the origin of the cartesian axes (X,Y,Z all perpendicular)
- The ligands (L) are considered to be at a long way from the metal (non-bonding distance)
- The metal feels the effect of the ligands as though it is spread out on the surface of a sphere
- This sets up a spherical electrical field
- The energy of the d-orbitals remains equivalent (degenerate)
- The overall energy of the orbitals and the electrons within them, are uniformly raised (relative to the free metal ion) because of the electron-electron electrostatic repulsions
- As the ligand-sphere is brought into bonding distance with the metal, some orbitals are stabilised relative to the spherical field and some are de-stabilised
- The stabilised orbitals will feel less e-e repulsion to the ligands relative to the spherical field and reverse of true for the de-stabilised orbitals
What happens to the energy of d-orbitals in a spherical field
- D-orbitals energies are raised relative to the spherical field
- Due to e-e repulsions
Does the arrangement of 6 ligands around a metal ion have inversion symmetry
- Yes
2. Gerade ‘g’
In an octahedral case which orbitals will raise in energy and why
- The ligands will point directly at the lobes of the metal dz^2 and dx^2-y^2 orbitals
- The electron-electron repulsions will raise the energy of the electrons in theses two 3d orbitals with respect to the spherical field
What is the name for the average energy of d-orbtials
- Barycentre
In an octahedral case which orbitals will lower in energy and why
- The energy of the electrons in the metal d-orbitals whose lobes point between the ligands, dxy and dxz and dyz, is lowered with respect to the spherical field
What happens to the total energy of the orbitals
- Remains the same
What label is given to stabilised orbitals in an octahedral complex
- t2g
What label is given to destabilised orbitals in an octahedral complex
- eg
What is the name and given to the energy gap between the two sets of orbitals
- Delta(o) or delta(oct) or 10 Dqo
2. Crystal field splitting energy
What is the relationship between the total stabilisation of the t2g and destabilisation of the eg orbitals
- They are equal
How much is each t2g orbital stabilised by
- -0.4Deltao relative to the free ion in a spherical field