CRP 104 Lecture 9 Flashcards
challenge 1 identify potental pool and motivations
-demographics, location, values and influences, culture, religion, social drivers, research experience
-subject motivations (monetary, treatement, advance research, community benefits, societial benefits)
-low doses, less clinic visits, less side effects
-location of clinic
-reduce expenses
challenge 2 design for success
-protocol recruiting strats
-does exclusion crietiera have unnesscary points?
-are timelines reasonable for pop and eligibility process?
-competition between sites for participants, keep tabs on other trials, use a registry system to authenticate your study to pool
-keep relationships with pool alive, do not delay process longer than neccessary
-remote screening, flexible study schedule, home visits
challenge 3 communications
-branding: ads, staff interactions, written docs
-all subject material must be approved by REB (ads, scripts)
-sponsor may want to approve as well
-some locations such as hospitals and schools have review boards for ads
-informed consent begins with advertisment
-not unduly coercive or promise a cure beyond the protocol
-cannot caim drug is safe or effective for the purpose of the trial
-must be clear it is investigational
-no “free medical treatement”
-do not emphasize payment
3 types media approaches
-direct (candidate meets some of criteria from the star, i.e. in a clinic specific to the condition of interest,phone databases,physician recruitment)
-semi-direct (targets candiates based on generic criteria, demographics, specific magazines, websites, peer referral, social media ads)
-indirect (wide spread targeting of potential candidates, newspaper, subway ad, social media)
eligibility and enrollment
-may need follow up with ineligble subject (failed blood test, medical care)
-all subject need to know eligibility status
-enrollment defintion varies, could be signing of ICF, randomization, dosing, etc
-assesments and enrollment must be documented
-changes to eligibilty must be documented, and subject re-assessed using protcol criteria (ie stoping criteria)
supplies
-labratory supplies, subject supplies (diary, thermometer), general (gloves, masks, batteries), equipment.
-need to know where supplies will come from, how many, how long to receive, budget, list of supplies
-inventory of supplies, issues of concern (delivery, expiry)
-place orders in advance of running out
-budget issues
pre-trial timeline
-feasibiliy
-trial agreement/contract
-CTA
-REB submissions
-approvals
-procedure setup (SOP, training)
-recrutiment
-screening
-drug handling
-enrollment
during trial timeline
-visits
-AE/SAE
-last visit
-data entry
-analysis and reporting
project manager definition
-PM, team lead for entire project, authorized to lead team and responsible for objectives
project manager initiation
-high level timeline
-feasibility (finding sites - by sponsor)
-sign CTA
-budgeting
-site regulatory docs
-vendor assesment, selection and management
-investigator meeting plnning
-protocol finalization
feasibiliy questionnaries
-for potential sites
-staffing, experienced staff
-experience with population, popuation pool size, past success at recruitment
-SOPs
-facilites and equiptment
-regulatory inspections in past, critical findings
-professional reputation(publications, (teaching) hospitals, clinics)
-location and accessibility
-interest
pre-study site visit (PSSV)
-assess site facility and research staff to ensure suitabiltity with protcol
-tour of facilites
-current copies of staff CV and GCP training
-documentation for experience with patient recruitment within protocol timeframe
-patient identificationand recruitment strats
-discuss protocol and concerns of site
-completing trials
-review/obtain site SOPs
vendor assessment
-ensure meet requirements of study conduct
-costs of services
-contracts(outline resonsibility of sponsor and vendor)
budget
-staffing
-equitment and supplies
-external vendor services (ie. labs)
-overhead/profit
-grant funds
investigator’s meeting
-finalize protcol, procdures
-standardize study conduct
-minimize site differences
-train personnel
-outstanding questions to answer
-investigator’s teams, study managers, monitors, medical/clinical/regulatory experts, QA all attend