Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Critical Thinking And Logic > Critical Thinking And Logic > Flashcards

Critical Thinking And Logic Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 3 dimensions of critical thinking?

A

Analyzing, Evaluating, and Improving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Egocentrism

A

the tendency to view everything in relationship to oneself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sociocentrism

A

the assumption that one’s own social group is inherently superior to all others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

First order thinking

A

Ordinary thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Second order thinking

A

Critical thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weak sense critical thinking

A

Ignores the flaws in their own thinking, and makes no effort to consider other viewpoints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Strong sense critical thinking

A

A consistent pursuit of what is intellectually fair and just

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Critical thinking traits

A 
Intellectual humility
Intellectual courage 
Intellectual empathy
Intellectual integrity 
Intellectual perseverance 
Intellectual autonomy
Confidence in reason
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 3 functions of the mind?

A
  1. Thinking
  2. Feeling
  3. Wanting
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the universal elements of thinking?

A 
Purposes
Questions
Assumptions
Implications
Information 
Concepts
Inferences 
Points of View
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the 9 intellectual standards?

A
  1. Clarity
  2. Accuracy
  3. Precision
  4. Relevance
  5. Depth
  6. Breadth
  7. Logic
  8. Significance
  9. Fairness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Breadth

A

The broadness of our thought - considering issues counter to our own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Socratic questioning

A

a systematic, disciplined approach to asking questions aimed at assessing truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 3 types of questions?

A
  1. Questions of fact
  2. Questions of preference
  3. Questions of judgment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Questions of fact

A

Have definitive answers - only one correct answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Questions of preference

A

Have many possible answers based on subjective preferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Questions of judgement

A

Evidence and reasoning within multiple systems - more than one answer, with some better than others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are the dimensions of decision making?

A
  1. Figure out and rearticulate most fundamental goals and needs
  2. Take problems and decisions one by one
  3. Figure out implications of alternatives
  4. Figure out needed info and seek it
  5. Draw reasonable inferences
  6. Figure out long and short term options
  7. Consider pros and cons of decisions
  8. Be strategic
  9. Monitor the implications
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the 2 components of strategic thinking?

A
  1. Identification. Recognizing when your thinking is irrational or flawed
  2. Intellectual action. Engaging and challenging your own thinking
20
Q

Mill’s method of determining causation

A
  1. Common factor: looking for a single shared factor
  2. Single difference: looking for a causal factor that is present in one situation but absent in another, similar, situation
21
Q

Concomitant variation

A

looking for a pattern of variation between a possible cause and a possible effect

22
Q

Process of elimination

A

successively ruling out non-causal factors until one correct causal factor remains

23
Q

Inert information

A

We think we understand this information, but we don’t and can’t use it.

24
Q

Activated Ignorance

A

We mislearn or partially learn information or accept illogical beliefs and then act on them

25
Q

Activated Knowledge

A

We bring significant ideas and knowledge into the mind and are able to apply them systematically to new situations

26
Q

What are the 3 types of thinkers?

A
  1. Uncritical persons
  2. Skilled manipulators
  3. Fair minded critical persons
27
Q

Ad hominem fallacy

A

Dismissing an argument by attacking the person who offers it rather than by refuting its reasoning

28
Q

appeal to authority

A

Justifying support for a position by citing an esteemed or well-known figure who supports it. An appeal to authority does not address the merit of the position

29
Q

begging the question fallacy

A

Asserting a conclusion that is assumed in the reasoning. The reason given to support the conclusion restates the conclusion

30
Q

denying inconsistencies fallacy

A

Refusing to admit contradictions or inconsistencies when making an argument or defending a position

31
Q

faulty analogy fallacy

A

Drawing an invalid comparison between things for the purpose of either supporting or refuting some position. A faulty analogy suggests that because two things are alike in some respect, they must be alike in other respects

32
Q

hasty generalization fallacy

A

Inferring a general proposition about something based on too small a sample or an unrepresentative sample

33
Q

red herring fallacy

A

Introducing an irrelevant point or topic to divert attention from the issue at hand. It is a tactic for confusing the point under debate

34
Q

slippery slope fallacy

A

Suggesting that a step or action, once taken, will lead inevitably to similar steps or actions with presumably undesirable consequences

35
Q

straw man fallacy

A

Distorting or exaggerating an opponent’s argument so that it might be more easily attacked

36
Q

Quantitative evidence

A

quantifies an observation or phenomenon—i.e., expresses it as a number or empirical measure deriving from quantitative research and deductive analysis

37
Q

Qualitative evidence

A

describes or recounts an observation or phenomenon. It communicates understanding and meaning

38
Q

Order of weighing the evidence

A
  1. Studies
  2. Surveys
  3. Anecdotal testimony
  4. Economic impact
  5. Environmental impact
  6. Documentary
  7. Testimony
39
Q

Risk reduction

A

a statistical expression that appears most commonly in reports about health risks - can be deceptive because they may be expressed in either relative or absolute terms, and the form in which they are reported can significantly impact our perception of the actual magnitude of the reduced risk

40
Q

Examples of misuse in stats

A
  1. Y axis distortion
  2. Not using absolute numbers
  3. Using the mean rather than median numbers
41
Q

2 steps of developing a rational mind

A
  1. Identifying the predictable, pathological tendencies we have
  2. Correcting these pathologies through critical thinking
42
Q

Egocentric myopia

A

Adopting an overly narrow point of view and thinking in absolutes

43
Q

Egocentric oversimplification

A

Ignoring complexity and embracing simplicity that conforms to our existing views, values, and beliefs

44
Q

Egocentric immediacy

A

Overgeneralizing so that immediate events, whether favorable or unfavorable, influence thinking

45
Q

Egocentric absurdity

A

Failing to recognize thinking that has “absurd” consequences

46
Q

Characteristics of an advanced thinker

A
  1. Understandings
  2. Monitoring
  3. Employing
  4. Developing
  5. Embracing

Critical Thinking And Logic (1 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions