Critical Thinking Flashcards
Credibility pneumonic?
CRAVEN
Flaws pneumonic?
A PRAT CAN PASS
Credibility C?
Circumstances
Credibility R?
Reputation
Credibility A?
Ability to see
Credibility V?
Vested interest
Credibility E?
Expertise
Credibility N?
Neutrality
Credibility - Circustance
Details of an event or situation
Credibility - Reputation
How someone is thought of because of their character or position
Credibility - Ability to see
How good was eyewitness ability, were they eyewitness, or a secondary source?
Credibility - Vested interest
Do they gain anything from claiming certain truths?
Credibility - Expertise
Do they have the relevant experience, training, knowledge and skills?
Credibility - Neutrality
Are they impartial?
Flaw - A
Ad Hominem/Appeals
Flaw - P
Post Hoc/Particular to the general
Flaw - R
Restricted options
Flaw - Appeals
History, popularity, emotion
Flaw - T
Tu Quoque
Flaw - C
Circular argument
Flaw - N
Necessary/sufficient confusion
Flaw - S
Slippery slope/Straw man
Flaw - Ad Hominem
Against the man - criticising the author not addressing the argument
Flaw - Post Hoc
If one phenomenon occurs after another, it is assumed to be caused by it
Flaw - Particular to the general
Arguing from a limited number of cases
All/some confusion
Flaw - Restricted options
Presenting the situation which makes it seem like there are fewer options than there actually are
Flaw - Tu Quoque
You too argument - if someone does it it’s okay for me to
Flaw - Circular argument
The reasoning is not distinct from the conclusion, there is no external support
Flaw - Necessary/sufficient confusion
Confusing something between being essential (minimum requirement) in a situation and being all that is required
Flaw - Slippery slope
Arguing that one thing will inevitably cause others of worsening consequence
Flaw - Straw man
Presenting a form of the opposing view negatively in order to knock down the whole argument
Argument indicators - reasons
because, as, since, due to, such as
Argument indicators - conclusions
therefore, so thus, it follows that, consequently, should
Define claim
A statement or judgement that can be challenged
Define counter-assertion
A reason that would support an opponents argument